Case law

State v. Ollivier

Washington Supreme Court · Oct 31, 2013

Balancing the Factors Balancing the Barker factors clearly weighs against the defendant. … Qualifying Information Sufficient To Establish Probable Cause The trial court determined that when the false information was omitted, there was sufficient qualifying information in the affidavit to establish probable

Right-Price Recreation, LLC v. CPCC

105 Wash. App. 813 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 20, 2001

To help prevent such lawsuits, the legislature granted immunity from civil liability to parties who, in good faith, communicate a complaint to a government agency. RCW 4.24.510. … When " clearly necessary" to make this decision, the trial court may undertake in camera review of the requested information. Snedigar, 114 Wash.2d at 166 , 786 P.2d 781 .

ACF Property Management, Inc. v. Chaussee

69 Wash. App. 913 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 17, 1993

Thus, the words "[a]ll claims" in the first sentence are qualified by the subsequent language of the clause. … The issues decided in this arbitration were clearly not referable to arbitration under the parties' agreement.

HIPPLE v. McFadden

255 P.3d 730 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 28, 2011

The complaint alleges that in 2005, DAC determined that Hipple qualified for appointed counsel, supporting the inference that he was unable to pay the terms of the initial contempt order. … And as an exception, the burden is on the party asserting it, here Hipple, to establish sufficient facts demonstrating that the rule applies. Rivas v. Overlake Hosp. Med.

Tsanev v. Tsanev

District Court, W.D. Washington · Aug 18, 2022

Defendant claims that his obligation under the Affidavit of Support ceased in 10 January 2020 because Plaintiff attained enough qualifying quarters of coverage under the Social 11 Security Act based on Defendant’s qualifying … benefits qualify as 4 income of the sponsored immigrant.

In re Det. of Reyes

Washington Supreme Court · Sep 24, 2015

The petition relied on the residential burglary, which involved a sexual attack, and a prior conviction for child rape as qualifying sexually violent offenses. … Further, I agree with the lead opinion that the release of a transcript to D.F .F. is clearly not a sufficient remedy.

Viking Properties, Inc. v. Holm

155 Wash. 2d 112 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 18, 2005

“Appurtenant” has a clear and long-established meaning: “annexed or belonging legally to some more important thing. . . incident to and passing in possession with real estate . . . .” … While the substantive due process claims asserted by Viking clearly have continued validity, see Mission Springs, Inc. v.

State v. Ollivier

Washington Supreme Court · Oct 31, 2013

Balancing the Factors Balancing the Barker factors clearly weighs against the defendant. … Qualifying Information Sufficient To Establish Probable Cause The trial court determined that when the false information was omitted, there was sufficient qualifying information in the affidavit to establish probable

State v. King

167 Wash. 2d 324 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 15, 2009

Clearly, this *335 situation presented an emergency, and Quinn reasonably responded across jurisdictional lines.” … The district court found the State had not established there was a valid interlocal agreement authorizing the arrest under RCW 10.93.070(1).

True v. United States

51 F. Supp. 720 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Sep 13, 1943

No doubt, between 1900 and 1904, the father and the two-sons established a reputation for honesty, fair dealing and integrity. … Defendant asks me to assume that it was issued to her in order that she might qualify as a corporation director.

State of Washington v. Brian Andrew Glaser

Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 18, 2021

Glaser’s home established probable cause Mr. … First, he asserts he has diplomatic immunity and asks this court to help him by contacting a police officer to run his driver’s license number or “badge #6666.” SAG at 1.

Snohomish County v. Public Utility District No. 1

105 Wash. 2d 606 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1986

We wanted, first, to establish once and for all that vital statistics — birth, death and marriage records — were public documents. … It had never occurred to us that they were not, and now we had the opportunity to establish a precedent of substance.

State Of Washington v. Michael S. Olsen

449 P.3d 1089 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 8, 2019

In Raleigh, which addressed an unlawful possession of a firearm conviction, we rejected the argument that under Recuenco, a gun must be operable during the commission of the crime to qualify as a firearm within the meaning … But even though none of Olsen’s more recent offenses were violent offenses or offenses against others, the court expressed concern that Olsen had been walking around with a loaded and concealed weapon, which clearly increased

Bell v. City of Lacey

District Court, W.D. Washington · Sep 30, 2021

The consequences of the Jail not having an HCA might be different if it 14 were not immune from suit. … Dkt. 167 at 12. 4 Under Washington law, a jury could not so find, in the absence of expert 5 testimony establishing the standard of care.

Delashaw v. Seattle Times Company

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jul 14, 2020

Delashaw may also establish that Dr. Cobbs 12 || forfeited the intracorporate communications privilege in whole or in part if he is able to 13 || establish that (1) Dr. … Cobbs’ motion for summary judgment on 4 application of Anti-SLAPP immunity. Dr. Cobbs is immune from Dr.

Matson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

872 F. Supp. 2d 1131 · District Court, W.D. Washington · May 25, 2012

Matson was qualified for the position prior to the alleged falsification of records. See Dkt. # 43 (Ex. C to Humphreys Decl. at 8:47-9:5). … .1998) ] requirement that a plaintiffs circumstantial evidence of pretext must be ‘specific’ and ‘substantial’ — this panel may not overturn Ninth Circuit precedents in the absence of ‘intervening higher authority’ that is ‘clearly

Fidelity Mortgage Corp. v. Seattle Times Co.

131 Wash. App. 462 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Dec 19, 2005

There is no indication that Fidelity acted or refrained from acting as a result of the Times’ rate charts. f 12 Further, Fidelity has failed to establish that the acts complained of constitute unfair or deceptive acts. … Fidelity contends that certain statements accompanying the chart qualify as misleading advertisements under Hartigan.

Estate of Borden v. STATE, DOC

95 P.3d 764 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jul 6, 2004

court can assess its admissibility; and it creates a record for adequate review.'" [57] But the portions of the record Bordon cites in her appellate brief do not articulate the legal and factual bases upon which Stough is qualified … This testimony would clearly have been beyond his expertise and merely speculative.

State Ex Rel. Chelan Electric Co. v. Superior Court

142 Wash. 270 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1927

The inadequacy of use by the general public is a test universally established. Clark v. Nash, 198 U. S. 361 ; Strickley v. Highland Boy Mining Co., 200 U. S. 527 . … From these cases it will be seen clearly that article XXI of our constitution does not conflict with the Federal constitution.

Specialty Asphalt & Constr., LLC v. Lincoln County

421 P.3d 925 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 26, 2018

The court in Skyline appropriately relied on principles established by this court. In Mottner v. … The negligent misrepresentation claim clearly survives summary judgment; the breach of contract claim clearly fails on summary judgment.