Case law

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. State

19 N.J. Tax 378 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 10, 2001

shall deliver to the taxpayer a detailed statement of the taxpayer’s Class II property together with the assessment of such property for the following tax year at the rate hereinabove established. … for farmland assessment of a property which a taxpayer seeks to qualify for assessment under the Farmland Assessment Act.

Quarto v. Adams

395 N.J. Super. 502 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 9, 2007

Harris by establishing same-sex civil unions, instead of amending the marriage laws to allow homosexual couples to wed. … It then delineated which of those relationships qualified for cognate treatment in New Jersey as civil unions.

Kenny v. United States

103 F. Supp. 971 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 26, 1952

therein stated, 292 U.S. at pages 286 and 287, 54 S.Ct. at page 694 : “The structure of a rate schedule calls in peculiar measure for the use of that enlightened judgment which the commission by training and experience is qualified … The published valuation may be considered as prima facie evidence in the proceeding but it is clearly not conclusive. The procedure which must be followed is prescribed by Section 15(7) of the Act, supra.

Burnett v. Board

409 N.J. Super. 219 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 20, 2009

endangered or the personal privacy or guaranteed rights of individuals would be clearly in danger of unwarranted invasion. [ N.J.S.A. 10:4-7.] … Mayor & Council & Clerk of Laurel Springs, 163 N.J.Super. 32 , 394 A. 2d 145 (App.Div. 1978), use of the exceptions is qualified.

De Vitis v. New Jersey Racing Com'n

202 N.J. Super. 484 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 15, 1985

An examination of the Commission's Final Decision establishes that it fully complied with these guidelines and that De Vitis's contention is therefore clearly without merit. … [e]very person is qualified to be a witness" at an administrative hearing. N.J.A.C. 1:1-15.2(e). See N.J.A.C. 1:1-15.6.

ONE MAIN ST EDGEWATER, LLC C/O NAT'L RE v. Edgewater Borough

New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 27, 2026

The third component of this analytical framework recognizes the primary or predominant use as a determinative factor in considering whether the entire facility qualifies for exemption. … These facts clearly demonstrate that the predominant use of the subject properties is multi-family residential apartments rather than commercial. III.

Jw v. Lr

325 N.J. Super. 543 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 13, 1999

Based upon that advice, defendant's attorney moved for summary judgment, urging that no causation could be established absent expert testimony. … He also relied upon the legislative policy established by N.J.S.A. 2A:61B-1. [2] Plaintiff's opposing certification stated, in pertinent part: 2.

Colleen Scheuer v. Rmts, LLC

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 21, 2025

In addition, plaintiff contends that her generalized anxiety disorder qualifies as a disability. … Bus Lines, Inc., obesity is not a disability unless it has an underlying medical cause, a condition that plaintiff clearly failed to establish in this case. 458 N.J. Super. 522, 532 (App. Div. 2019).

Jaguar Land Rover N.A. v. Director, Division of Taxation & Mahwah Twp.

New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 1, 2022

Dir., Div. of Taxation, 157 N.J. 1,7 (1999) (“It is well established that in construing a statute, one must first consider its plain language.”); State v. … Because this court finds 8 Upon the court’s inquiry at oral argument, the parties agreed that Section 208’s use of the word radius clearly limits the scope to actual distance rather than necessary travel distance.

Anderson v. Director, Division of Taxation

24 N.J. Tax 141 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 5, 2008

The Director cross-moves for summary judgment under R. 4:46-1, arguing that the language of N.J.S.A. 54:4-8.67 clearly sets forth a three-year residency requirement for claimant eligibility. … A person who has been an eligible claimant for a previous tax year shall qualify as an eligible claimant for the second full tax year following a move to another *150 homestead in Neto Jersey, despite not meeting the three-year

Matter of Vey

135 N.J. 306 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 31, 1994

They can engage in high-speed chases with absolute immunity from suit, Tice v. … The State Police found her psychologically qualified and offered her a position.

Helmsley v. Borough of Fort Lee

78 N.J. 200 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1978

L. at 599] The statute which recently established a tax court, N. J. S. … Resolution of this debate is clearly a legislative function.

Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. A. & P. Trucking Corp.

51 N.J. Super. 412 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 28, 1958

In the latter respect, at least, the facts are clearly distinguishable from the instant case. … Legal scholars are of the opinion that such a poll, if properly qualified, should be admitted into evidence and not excluded on the ground of hearsay. Sorensen & Sorensen, "Opinion Research Evidence," 28 N.Y.U.L.

New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development v. Crest Ultrasonics

434 N.J. Super. 34 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 7, 2014

The latter statute requires unemployed residents to seek jobs actively in order to qualify for unemployment benefits. … There is clearly such a rational basis underlying the legislation before us.

PATEL v. CRIST

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 7, 2020

Immunities 1, Sovereign Immunity The State Defendants argue that they are entitled to sovereign immunity, such that the Complaint should be dismissed as to them in its entirety.4 State Def. … Moreover, a plaintiff “must clearly and specifically set forth facts sufficient to satisfy . . standing” as “a federal court is powerless to create its own jurisdiction by embellishing otherwise deficient allegations of

Gurzo v. American Smelting & Refining Co.

132 N.J.L. 485 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1945

We think there was clearly a variance and that it was made apparent from the testimony of plaintiff’s own medical witnesses, Dr. Grossman and Dr. Ormsby. … Ormsby said that he thought the plaintiff’s employment was deleterious to Ms active tuberculosis after 1939, yet he qualified the statement by saying that any type of work would be deleterious to him in that condition and

State of New Jersey v. Jessica S. Matrongolo

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 3, 2024

Accordingly, we give "no deference to the trial court's 'interpretation of the law and the legal consequences that flow from established facts.'" State v. Maurer, 438 N.J. Super. 402, 411 (App. … Rather, the Manual's drafters clearly titled the section "Legal Eligibility" and declined to condition eligibility on any other requirements.

SNEAD v. BALLY'S PARK PLACE, LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 31, 2023

The two-inch elevation of the raised board “is the kind of minor defect that does not qualify as a dangerous condition under the [TCA].” Charney, 732 F. … “[A] net opinion alone is insufficient to sustain plaintiff's burden of establishing that the public entity was on constructive notice of a 3 Snead’s argument that Atlantic City loses its immunity under the TCA because

Maureen Widofsky v. New Brunswick Parking Authority

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 2024

4- 6, and discretionary immunity, N.J.S.A. 59:2-3(a). … In the event the court reopens discovery, the considerations and bases underlying its order barring defendant's expert under Rule 4:17-7 will clearly have changed.

Estate of Colquhoun v. Estate of Colquhoun

177 N.J. Super. 491 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1981

In our view, therefore, the reimbursement issue need never be reached because well-settled and long established principles of equity compel the extinguishment of the mortgage in these circumstances. … This being so, there was no longer a mortgage in esse during the lives of the cotenants and clearly then, no basis for its revival thereafter.