Case law

Conrady v. Lincoln County

260 Or. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 2013

See Bellikka v. … The closest they come to addressing the meaning of that statute is to quote from an opinion by the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), Sherwood v.

Reid v. Kier

175 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1944

In Thorp v. … Strong v. Kamm & Brown, 13 Or. 172 , 9 Pac. 331 (1886); Feldman v. McGuire, 34 Or. 309 , 55 Pac. 872 (1889); Miles v. Bowers, 49 Or. 429 , 90 Pac. 905 (1907); The Home v. Selling, 91 Or. 428 , 179 Pac. 261 (1919).’

Alanis v. Barrett Business Services

179 Or. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 2002

In Hernandez v. … In construing the administrative rule, we apply the same analytical framework applicable to the construction of statutes, PGE v.

Wausau Insurance v. Morris

103 Or. App. 270 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 5, 1990

Employer’s insurer seeks review of the Board’s decision that he is also entitled to benefits for temporary total disability until he becomes medically stationary or is released for work. The Board relied on Dawkins v. … SAIF v. Stephen, 308 Or 41, 47-48 , 774 P2d 1103 (1989).

Brunick v. Clatsop County

204 Or. App. 326 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2006

Board of Regents v. … Board of Commrs., Wabaunsee Cty. v. Umbehr, 518 US 668, 675 , 116 S Ct 2342 , 135 L Ed 2d 843 (1996).

SAIF Corp. v. Custer

181 Or. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 2002

SAIF v. Dobbs, 172 Or App 446, 451 , 19 P3d 932 , on recons 173 Or App 599 , 23 P3d 987 (2001). … SAIF also argues that the Board’s finding lacks substantial reason because the Board failed to explain why SAIF’s acceptance was not limited by the phrase “related to the fall of May 8, 1998.” See SAIF v.

Ollilo v. Clatskanie Peoples' Utility District

170 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1942

Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Town of Batesville, 187 Miss. 737 , 193 So. 814 ; Thomas v. McHugh, 65 N. D. 149 , 256 N. W. 763 ; State ex rel. v. Snyder, 129 Ohio State 206 , 194 N. … In the case of Weathers v. Todd County, 271 Ky. 172 , 111 S.

Wingfield v. National Biscuit Company

8 Or. App. 408 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 1972

Jackson v. SAIF, 7 Or App 109 , 490 P2d 507 (1971). … Co. v. Tax Com., 230 Or 461, 468 , 370 P2d 608 (1962). We hold that the fees awarded by the trial judge were authorized under OKS 656.262 (8) (Jackson v.

Noble v. Yancey.

116 Or. 356 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1925

Clancy v. Columbia Irr. Dist., supra. … Louis v. Amy, 120 U. S. 600 ( 30 L. Ed. 798 , 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 739); Rialto Irr. Dist. v. Stowell, 246 Fed. 294 ( 159 C. C. A. 24 ); Boynton v. Dist.

Myrtle Point Mill & Lumber Co. v. Clarke

102 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1922

In Oliver v. … Co. v.

Smurfit Newsprint v. DeRosset

118 Or. App. 368 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 3, 1993

EBI, as Smurfit’s insurer at the time of the 1977 injury, authorized knee replacement surgery and requested that the Board reopen the 1977 claim on its own motion. The Board did so. … In SAIF v.

Peabody v. SAIF

Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 2023

The board adhered to its decision. Claimant petitioned for judicial review, challenging the board’s decision to award $12,500 in attorney fees, rather than the $31,000 claimant had requested. Peabody v. … See Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac.

Jenning v. Miller

48 Or. 201 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 29, 1906

. § 797; Pulse v. Hamer, 8 Or. 251 ; White v. Holland, 17 Or. 4 ( 3 Pac. 573 ); Rosenblat v. Perkins, 18 Or. 156 ( 22 Pac. 598 , 6 L. R. A. 257). … Perf. §274; Brown, Stat. Frauds (5 ed.), § 476; Wood v. Thornly, 58 Ill. 470 ; Koch v. National Union Build,. Assoc., 137 Ill. 497 ( 27 N. E. 530 ) ; Swales v. Jackson, 126 Ind. 282 ( 26 N. E. 62 ); Mahana v.

Roseburg Forest Products v. Long

325 Or. 305 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1997

The Board agreed with the administrative law judge’s findings of fact and wrote: “See [Beneficiaries of Strametz v. … In Boise Cascade Corp. v.

Chaffee v. Nolt

94 Or. App. 83 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 1988

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board. … See Roller v. Weyerhaeuser, 67 Or App 583 , 679 P2d 341 , on reconsideration 68 Or App 743 , 683 P2d 554 , rev den 297 Or 601 (1984); Safstrom v.

Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Rector

151 Or. App. 693 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 1997

Messmer v. Deluxe Cabinet Works, 130 Or App 254, 257 , 881 P2d 180 (1994), rev den 320 Or 507 (1995). … Corp. v. Bird, 99 Or App 560, 564 , 783 P2d 33 (1989), rev den 309 Or 645 (1990) (emphasis in original). In this case, the Board determined that claimant’s condition had changed since her earlier request.

State v. McBride

96 Or. App. 268 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 26, 1989

State v. McBride, State v. Pursifull (two cases) and State v. Symes (two cases), have been consolidated for opinion. … In State v. Pursifull and State v.

State v. Wiggins

247 Or. App. 490 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

See State v. Meharry, 342 Or 173 , 149 P3d 1155 (2006); State v. Kock, 302 Or 29 , 725 P2d 1285 (1986); Brown, 301 Or 268 . … (Emphasis added.)); Brown, 301 Or at 277, 278 (describing an “immediate” search of an automobile); cf. State v.

State v. Sagner

18 Or. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1974

In State v. … Brown, supra, and is otherwise insufficient as a basis for us to consider the merits of the exception, if a point is to be made that the part of the instruction relating to the statute of limitations was error. State v.

Flores v. SAIF Corporation

237 Or. App. 645 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 2010

App. 645 Carmen FLORES, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION, Earl E. Brown & Sons, and Department of Consumer and Business Services, Respondents. 080165H; A141885. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted September 15, 2010. … Carreon v. Commerce & Industry Ins. Co., 233 Or.App. 440 , 226 P.3d 73 (2010).