Case law

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 10, 1985

Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 (Okla. 1980). We next examine the Administrative Procedures Act, supra, to ascertain if it grants the Board such authority. … Co. v.

Overstreet v. School Dist. No. 57

193 Okla. 71 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1943

Caskey, and V. P. … S. 1941 § 523; Fox et al. v.

Opinion No. 68-135 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 1968

Herrin v. Arnold, 183 Okl. 392 , 82 P.2d 979 ;School District No. 24, et al. v. Hodge, 199 Okl. 81 , 133 P.2d 575 ; Hatfield v. Jimerson, Co. Supt., Okl., 365 P.2d 980 . … of the rules and regulations of the State Board of Education.

Peckham v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.

88 Okla. 174 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1923

Jennings v. Brown, 20 Okla. 294 , 94 Pac. 557 . … Co. v. Kroeger, 17 Idaho, 384 , 105 Pac. 1070 , 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 968; Northern Pacific R. Co. v. Murray, 87 Fed. 648 ; Ennis-Brown Co. v. Central Pacific Ry. Co., 228 Fed. 51 ; Western Union Telegraph Co. v.

Hockaday v. Jones

8 Okla. 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

(Tootle v. Brown, 4 Okla. 612 , 46 Pac. 550 ; United States Nat. Bank v. National Bank of Guthrie, 6 Okla. 163 , 51 Pac. 119 ; Penny v. … Meredith, 44 Mo. 500 ; Railway Co. v. Reynolds, 89 Mo. 146 , 1 S. W. 208 ; Luco v. Brown, [Cal.] 14 Pac. 366 ; Losey v. Neidig, [Neb.] 71 N. W. 1067 ; Insurance Co. v. Robbins, [Neb.] 73 N. W. 269 ; John V.

Opinion No. 78-207 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1978

In Zeilenga v. … Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. Gardner, Okl., 353 P.2d 695 (1960). It is further reflected in State v. Oakes, Okl., 281 P.2d 749 , 753 (1955), citing Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v.

Hendricks v. McCreary

467 P.2d 478 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1970

See In Re Warren School District Election, Okl., 384 P.2d 49 ; Berryman v. Howell, 194 Okl. 259 , 149 P.2d 505 ; Ramsey v. County Commissioners of Payne County, 149 Okl. 289 , 300 P. 389 . … No. 24 v. Renick (1921), 83 Okl. 158 , 201 P. 241 .

Opinion No. 75-322 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1976

The doctrine of affinity is explained in the case of State v. Hooper, 140 Kan. 481 , 37 P.2d 52 , as follows: "Degrees of relationship by affinity are computed as are degrees of relationship by consanguinity. … Hettinger v. State Deposit Trust Co. of Baltimore, Md., 79 A. 205 . Accordingly, under the factual situation you outlined in your request, the two board members previously referred to are not related by affinity.

Larson v. Bunch

208 Okla. 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1953

The principle was first announced by this court in 1904, in the case of Christy v. City of Kingfisher, 13 Okla. 585 , 76 P. 135 , and thereafter *281 announced in the case of Akin, County Supt., v. … The board’s assumption that Bunch moved from the ward is as the board says, “an assumption.”

Wade, County Superintendent v. Eakin

31 Okla. 640 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

Waiving the issuance of the alternative writ and a rule to show cause (Ellis et al. v. … Ellis et al. v. Armstrong et al., supra.

Wood v. Independent School District No. 141

661 P.2d 892 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1983

As we noted in Childers v. … See Young v. Board of Pharmacy, *896 81 N.M. 5 , 462 P.2d 139 , 36 ALR3d 1, § 3[a] (New Mexico 1969); 2 Am.Jur.2d Administrative Law § 378.

Bemo v. State

298 P.3d 1190 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 2013

West v. State, 1990 OK CR 61, ¶ 16 , 798 P.2d 1083, 1087 . An arrest is not a prerequisite for the withdrawal of blood under 47 O.S.2011, § 10-104(B). Guest v. State, 2002 OK CR 5, ¶ 6 , 42 P.3d 289, 290 . … See Sanders v. State, 2002 OK CR 42, ¶ 8 , 60 P.3d 1048, 1050 . The plain language of both § 753 and § 756(A) reveals that they do not apply to Appellant’s case because he was not placed under arrest. See State v.

New England Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization

121 Okla. 277 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1926

BRANSON, V. C. J. This is an original action in this court. The plaintiff is the-New England Oil & Pipe Line Company, a corporation. … The defendant is the state-board of equalization, the individual officers composing the board being named i-n the petition.

Woods v. Perryman

452 P.2d 588 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1969

Cross v. Brown, Okl., 363 P.2d 935 ; Skelly Oil Company v. Waters, Okl., 348 P.2d 320 ; Rider v. Bob Hiner Service Station, Okl., 321 P.2d 378 . … The decision is not in point and does not modify but affirms prior decisions of this court in Cross v. Brown, supra; Skelly Oil Company v. Waters, supra; and Rider v.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1994

The Oklahoma Supreme Court was persuaded by the decision in the Montana case of Board of Regents of Higher Education v. … The Baker court was also influenced by the Nebraska case of Board of Regents of University of Nebraska v.

Frost v. School Dist. No. 98

118 Okla. 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1926

One of the members of the school board brought them in to me, but I don’t recall which member. Q. Of what school board? A. District No. 98. Q. And you don’t 'know which one it was? A. No, sir. Q. … Stewart v. Board of Education, 104 Okla. 141 , 230 Pac. 504 ; School Dist. No. 18, of Creek County v. Ferguson, 45 Okla. 680 , 146 Pac. 711 .

Fennell v. Lannom

46 Okla. 519 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1915

Wiedwall v. Dodson, 95 Cal. 450 , 30 Pac. 580 . (Id.) “Sec. 8176. … State v. Dunson, 71 Tex. 65 , 9 S. W. 103 . Where an attempted dissolution is void, acquiescence and lapse of time *525 are not sufficient. Largen v. State, 76 Tex. 323 , 13 S. W. 161 .

In Re Visitation Rights of Fox

567 P.2d 985 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1977

The Kansas Supreme Court in Browning v. … Stark v. Watson, 359 P.2d 191 (Okl.1961). 3 . Browning v. Tarwater, 215 Kan. 501 , 524 P.2d 1135 (1974). 4 . In the Matter of Del Moral Rodriguez, 552 P.2d 397 (Okl.1976). 5 .

Opinion No. 80-100 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 29, 1980

In Ray v. … "In the case of Farley v.

Opinion No. 73-266 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1974

See Mack v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 296 F. Supp. 1259 (1969), Amos Treat Company v. Securities Exchange Commission, 306 F.2d 260 (1962), Cinderella Career Finishing School, Inc., et al. v. … Federal Trade Commission, 425 F.2d 583 (1970), Trans-World Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 254 F.2d 90 (1958); American Cyanamide Company v. F.T.C., 363 F.2d 757 (1966); contra: Pangburn v.