Case law

Lutcher S.A. Celulose E Papel Candoi v. Inter-American Development Bank

253 F. Supp. 568 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1966

National City Bank v. Republic of China, 348 U.S. 356, 358 , 75 S.Ct. 423 , 99 L.Ed. 389 (1955). 4 . The Schooner Exchange v. M’Fadden, 11 U.S. (7 Crunch) 116, 3 L.Ed. 287 (1812). 5 . United States v. … Alabama Power Company v. Ickes, 302 U.S. 464 , 58 S.Ct. 300 , 82 L.Ed. 374 (1938); Kansas City Power & Light Company v.

SILVER v. McCAMEY

221 F.2d 873 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 1955

It is not for us to insist that the Board should have followed some other course if, legally, it was authorized to do what it did. Brodie v. Young, 1943, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 169 , 133 F.2d 406 ; Gray v. … La Forest v. Board of Commissioners, 1937, 67 App.D.C. 396 , 92 F.2d 547 , certiorari denied, 1937, 302 U.S. 760 , 58 S.Ct. 367 , 82 L.Ed. 588 ; cf. generally, Nulter v.

Fogg v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2025

Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 25 F. Supp. 3d 144, 148 (D.D.C. 2014). … Thus, while Brown’s claims may be similar in some respects to Fogg’s, “the factual sufficiency of each claim would be assessed for each plaintiff . . . individually.” Peters v. District of Columbia, 873 F.

BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), Societe Anonyme v. Khalil

20 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 1997

Khalil approved this statement and it was submitted to the Board ofGovernors. Khalil appeared before the Board of Governors posing as a prospective beneficial owner of CCAH. … Mouzavires, 434 A.2d at 993 ; see Dooley v. United Tech. Corp., 786 F.Supp. 65, 71 (D.D.C.1992); Brown v. Artery Org., Inc., 654 F.Supp. 1106, 1110 (D.D.C.1987). This standard is satisfied by the facts alleged.

Theodore L. Lombard v. United States of America

690 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 14, 1982

United States v. Brown, supra, 348 U.S. at 113 , 75 S.Ct. at 145 . Thus, in Henry v. … See also Laswell v. Brown, supra, 683 F.2d at 269 .

Scolaro v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections and Ethics

104 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 14, 2000

Board here.” Id. Under Younger and its companion case, Samuels v. … Quoting NAACP v.

Bernard v. United States

575 A.2d 1191 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 31, 1990

Curry v. United States, 520 A.2d 255, 263 (D.C.1987). Rather, the government must establish that appellants knew of the location of the cocaine and that they exercised dominion and control over it. Brown v. … Brown, supra, 546 A.2d at 394 n. 2 (quoting standardized jury instruction); United States v. Cousins, 427 F.2d 382, 384 (9th Cir.1970). “Constructive possession may be sole or joint.” Brown, supra, 546 A.2d at 394 n. 2.

Moini v. Leblanc

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 24, 2020

Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (cleaned up). III. A. … Def.’s Mem. at 42 (citing Brown v. George Wash. Univ., 802 A.2d 382, 385 (D.C. 2002)). Even so, Moini has made a plausible allegation of an “arbitrary and capricious” decision.

International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, Local 806 v. National Labor Relations Board

434 F.2d 473 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 20, 1970

. § 160 (e). 7 Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 485 , 71 S. Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); National Labor Relations Board v. … Daniel Construction Co. v. N. L. R. B., 341 F.2d 805 , 809-810 (4th Cir. 1965); Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473 , 84 S.Ct. 894 , 11 L.Ed.2d 849 (1964); National Labor Relations Board v.

A. Eugene Ramey v. Charles Bowsher, Comptroller of the United States

915 F.2d 731 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 5, 1990

See Ramey v. GAO, 1 PAB R & D 102, 115-19 (Oct. 19, 1981), reproduced in part at Joint Appendix (“J.A.”) at 333. Accordingly, the Appeals Board awarded Ra-mey the requested within-grade salary increase. … See Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) (Title VII “provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment”). B.

Parnigoni v. ST. COLUMBA'S NURSERY SCHOOL

681 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2010

Parnigoni that the Board was ‘nervous’ about [Mr. Parnigoni’s] 2004 conviction.” Id. ¶ 20. The Board’s apprehension apparently stemmed from the fact that “Mr. … Lyles v. Micenko, 404 F.Supp.2d 182, 187 (D.D.C.2005) (quoting Homan v. Goyal, 711 A.2d 812, 818 (D.C. 1998) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)); see Browning v.

Hackney v. Chamblee

980 A.2d 427 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2009

Stansel v. American Sec. … Bolgiano & Co. v. Brown, 333 A.2d 674, 675 (D.C.1975) (“The promise to pay a reasonable attorney’s fee in addition to the face amount of the note plus interest means precisely that....

Rsr Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission

656 F.2d 718 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1981

ICC v. Jersey City, 322 U.S. 503, 514 , 64 S.Ct. 1129, 1134 , 88 L.Ed. 1420, 1428 (1944). 25 . Bowman Transp., Inc. v. … The administrative law judge had found that five of the seven indicia of a relevant market articulated in Brown Shoe Co. v.

Dallas Building and Construction Trades Council v. National Labor Relations Board, Dallas County Construction Employers Association, Inc., Intervenor

396 F.2d 677 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 23, 1968

See e. g., National Packing Co. v. NLRB, 377 F.2d 800 (10th Cir. 1967); Dayton Typographical Union No. 57 v. … The Board relies *683 most heavily on this court’s decision in in Centralia Bldg. and Constr. Trades Council v.

Chevy Chase Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Council

327 A.2d 310 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1974

C. v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board, D.C.App., 318 A.2d 294 (1974). That case involved the minimum wage to be paid to employees in the hotel, restaurant, and allied occupations. … That statute was considered by this court in Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 289 A.2d 885 (1972).

Tutt v. Federal Aviation Administration

173 F. App'x 843 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 2006

This appeal was considered on the record from the National Transportation Safety Board and on the briefs of the parties. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. … The Board’s decision affirming Petitioner’s violations of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) is supported by substantial evidence. See Chritton v. NTSB, 888 F.2d 854 , 856 (D.C.Cir.1989).

Browne v. Sanders

20 D.C. 455 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1892

Justice Cox delivered the opinion of the court. ' I am requested to announce the conclusions of the court in the case of Browne vs. Sanders and others. … The complainant was one of the directors of this association, one of the active managers, and was repeatedly elected a member of the board of directors.'

Gilfillan v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 17, 2025

See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2022). A “complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v.

George E. v. Stone v. Board of Examiners and Registrars of Architects of the District of Columbia

249 F.2d 104 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 6, 1957

petition for allowance of an appeal from the judgment of the Municipal Court of Appeals entered herein October 23, 1956, of petitioner’s brief, of respondent’s brief, of petitioner’s reply, and of the decision and order of the Board … of Examiners and Registrars of Architects entered herein June 21, 1956, contained in the transcript of record; and it appearing that, although the Board’s sole conclusion was that petitioner “did violate Section 27(a) of

Downey v. Ambassador Development, LLC

568 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 2008

See Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100, 107-09 , 61 S.Ct. 868 , 85 L.Ed. 1214 (1941); Bhagwanani, 355 F.Supp.2d at 297 ; Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M St. LLC, 257 F.Supp.2d 175, 177 (D.D.C.2003). … Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 26 F.Supp.2d 74, 77 (D.D.C.1998) (citing Marshall v.