Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,074 results
1.93s
District Court, S.D. Indiana · Nov 6, 2024
American Access has clearly articulated in their motion that their intervention is necessary as there is a dispute of fact whether Defendant Jose Pichardo Lopez qualifies as insured under American Access's policies. … Therefore, the proponent of the stay has the burden of clearly establishing the need for the Court to grant the motion. Landis at 255.
Cited 0 timesUnknown190 Ind. 385 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1921
The. same question was asked other doctors who had qualified as expert witnesses. … The adjudicated cases all agree in holding that a careful scrutiny should always be given evidence offered to establish the defense of insanity in criminal prosecutions.” In Butler v.
Cited 18 timesPublished961 F. Supp. 1260 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Apr 17, 1997
As the Government admits in its motion, the FTCA represents a limited waiver of the United States’ immunity from suit permitting a district court to exercise subject matter jurisdiction over claims for money damages based … An exception to this rule, not applicable here, exists when the facts required to establish jurisdiction are coextensive with those necessary to prevail on the merits. Peckmann v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBonzani v. Goshen Health System Inc
District Court, N.D. Indiana · Mar 10, 2022
Pleading Standards and Immunity. … for immunity under the HCQIA.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDASKALAKIS v. CP INDY DT, LLC D/B/A HYATT REGENCY INDIANAPOLIS
District Court, S.D. Indiana · May 30, 2025
The fact that a defendant anticipates the contingency of litigation resulting from an accident or event does not automatically qualify an 'in house' report as work product. . . . … A more or less routine investigation of a possibly resistable claim is not sufficient to immunize an investigative report developed in the ordinary course of business. . . .
Cited 0 timesUnknown41 Ind. App. 627 · Indiana Court of Appeals · May 12, 1908
Appellee, an incorporated town, sued appellant to recover money that appellant had received from the town for coal furnished and labor performed while appellant was a duly qualified and acting member of the board of trustees … Courts' are but human, and we are prone to let our sympathy for the one who, with honest motives, has subjected himself to heavy pecuniary loss, lead us to relax the rigors of established legal principles.
Cited 18 timesPublishedRensing v. Indiana State University Board of Trustees
437 N.E.2d 78 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1982
As noted above, the evidence in the cáse at bar clearly demonstrates that the benefits received by Rensing were conditioned upon his athletic ability and team participation. … This award may be renewed each year for a total of four years as long as you are academically qualified and abide by acceptable conduct standards.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States v. Conservation Chemical Co. of Illinois
733 F. Supp. 1215 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Nov 6, 1989
Of course, failure to submit a plan at all by a mandatory deadline is clearly a violation. … Although some of the deficiencies listed are clearly de minimis {see e.g., # 25 “This subsection should be separate from the tank storage section or the section should be retitled.”), other deficiencies are just as clearly
Cited 8 timesPublishedAmer. Bridge Co. v. Rev. Bd., Emp. SEC. Div.
121 Ind. App. 576 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1951
All of the foregoing cases are clearly distinguishable from the case at bar. … The unemployment compensation reserves established thereunder should be used for the payment of benefits to those who come within the objective of the Act.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTocarra L. Woodson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
Indiana Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 2017
not be Dec 20 2017, 10:58 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing … Woodson does not hold a license to be a registered nurse and does not have a degree qualifying her to be a registered nurse.
Cited 0 timesPublished121 Ind. 20 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1889
Perhaps the principle has never been more clearly stated than by the great constitutional lawyer whose statements, as Emerson says,“ lay in daylight.” … The conclusion dcducible from these authorities is, so far as it is here necessary to ascertain it, that where the Legislature has power to establish a scientific department, or to establish any public institution, it has
Cited 42 timesPublishedGarau Germano, P.C., and Faith Fenner v. Stephen W. Robertson
Indiana Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2019
“‘The basis of jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act is a justiciable controversy or question, which is clearly defined and affects the legal right, the legal status, or the legal relationship … Not only has she not yet entered into a qualifying settlement agreement, even if she had, her ability to receive damages from the PCF is far from established.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 F. Supp. 2d 795 · District Court, S.D. Indiana · May 19, 1998
However, it has long been established that an agreement to a “final,” “binding,” and “non-appealable” arbitration award does not prohibit appeals based upon the arbitrator’s abuse of authority oh bias. Dean v. … Indeed, the arbitrator clearly had authority to asséss actual dainages stemming from Seandia’s breach of contract.
Cited 10 timesPublished63 N.E.3d 316 · Indiana Supreme Court · Oct 26, 2016
But this contention fails to recognize established premises liability principles. … Ultimately, this Court determined that social guests qualify as invitees, so a landowner must exercise reasonable care for their protection. Id. at 643.
Cited 100 timesPublished654 F. Supp. 369 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 3, 1987
Lash, 682 F.2d 648 (7th Cir.1982), clearly ruled that the Warden of the Indiana State Prison was immune from damage claims in his official capacity under the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. … The procedures here established meet the minimum requirements of due process as established in Hewitt v. Helms.
Cited 6 timesPublishedZ.G. v. Marion County Department of Child Services
933 N.E.2d 494 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2010
Consequently, Ordower, Duran, and Martinez did not qualify as de facto custodians when DCS took custody of C.G. … Dalton testified that if she determines that she is not qualified to work with C.G. on sexual abuse issues, she will refer C.G. to another therapist.
Cited 7 timesPublishedAtlantic Casualty Insurance Co. v. Garcia
227 F. Supp. 3d 990 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Jan 5, 2017
.”); DE 23-12 (“The cause of the contamination is clearly the dry cleaning operations in which [the dry cleaners’ owners] engaged for many years ...”). … The nature of the claim, not the merit, establishes the insurer’s duty to defend. Trisler, 575 N.E.2d at 1023 . III.
Cited 3 timesPublished585 F. Supp. 1084 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · May 7, 1984
As to the effects of the conspiracy: lay and expert testimony established a reasonable probability that many people, enough to swing the election to Graddick, voted for John Grimes (whose name appeared before Douglas Grimes … And assisted by testimony of the plaintiffs’ well-qualified expert witness, Dr.
Cited 9 timesPublishedScott A. Steffey v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
Indiana Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 2020
Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Feb 13 2020, 1:38 pm court except for the purpose of establishing … An abuse of discretion occurs “when admission is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances.” Id.
Cited 0 timesPublished814 N.E.2d 301 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2004
we first note the provisions of Indiana Evidence Rule 702; ' If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence 'or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified … Such an abuse occurs when the trial court's decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and cireumstances of the case, or if it misinterprets the law. Vernon v.
Cited 22 timesPublished
Ask Donna