Case law

United Mine Workers of America, District 31 v. The National Labor Relations Board, Island Creek Coal Company, Intervenor

879 F.2d 939 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 21, 1989

We have also noted “that the Board’s determination that there has been no violation of the Act ‘must be upheld unless it has no rational basis.’ ” District 65, Distributive Workers v. … . at 825 (quoting NLRB v.

District of Columbia v. Lloyd

160 F.2d 581 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 1947

In Blair v. … See also Watkins v. Rives, 75 U. S.App.D.C. 109, 125 F.2d 33 . 8 Brown v. Renshaw, 1881, 57 Md. 67 .

Foster v. Gonzales

516 F. Supp. 2d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2007

Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985); see also Jarmon v. Powell, 208 F.Supp.2d 21, 23 (D.D.C.2002). The 45-day deadline for initiating EEO counseling is, however, subject to equitable tolling. … Workers v.

American Forest Resource Council v. United States

77 F.4th 787 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 2023

The ASQ has fluctuated over time, starting at 500 million board feet in 1937 and peaking at 1.2 billion board feet in 1972. See Murphy, 65 F.4th at 1127. … LLC v. Bernhardt, 417 F. Supp. 3d 22, 27–28 & n.4 (D.D.C. 2019). The minimum timber volume the BLM must sell annually, then, is 123 million board feet and the maximum is 287 million board feet.

Morrison v. MacNamara

407 A.2d 555 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1979

See, e. g., Brown v. Keaveny, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 118, 326 F.2d 660, 661 (1963) (per curiam) (“in his own or similar localities”); Quick v. … [Brown v. Keaveny, supra 117 U.S.App.D.C. at 118, 326 F.2d at 661 (Skelly Wright, J., dissenting).] 8 . The duty may be imposed by statute, see Martin v.

First Nat. S. S. Co. v. United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp.

135 F.2d 469 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1943

We so ruled in United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corporation v. First National S. S. Co., 73 App.D.C. 237 , 119 F.2d 6 .

Cohen v. Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of the D.C.

311 F. Supp. 3d 242 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 24, 2018

[is] governed by the Board of Trustees" with the power to sue or be sued); see also Hill v. … Com'rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 404-05, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Ralph Nader and the Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Air Transport Association of America, Intervenor

657 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1981

See Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern R. Co., 372 U.S. 658 , 83 S.Ct. 984 , 10 L.Ed.2d 50 (1963); United States v. SCRAP, 412 U.S. 669 , 93 S.Ct. 2405 , 37 L.Ed.2d 254 (1973); Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. … See, e. g., Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern R. Co., 372 U.S. 658, 671 , 672 n.24, 83 S.Ct. 984, 991 , 10 L.Ed.2d 50 (1963); United States v.

National Treasury Employees Union v. United States

788 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 1992

Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968), the Supreme Court reversed a state court decision sustaining the dismissal of a public school teacher for publishing a letter critical of the board … See Perry Education Ass’n v. Perry Local Educators’ Ass’n, 460 U.S. 37, 45 , 103 S.Ct. 948, 955 , 74 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983); Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2290 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980).

America v. Mills

677 F. Supp. 2d 51 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2009

Brown v. United States, 389 F.3d at 1297 ; see also Brown v. … Brown accepted the offer by filing an amended complaint. See Brown v. United States, 271 F.Supp.2d at 228 . 5 .

Local No. 627, International Union Of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

518 F.2d 1040 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 8, 1975

Eng. v. NLRB, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 294, 297 , 480 F.2d 1186, 1189 (1973) 14 What this court said in Greater Boston Television Corp. v. F. C. … NLRB v.

Affinity Hospital, LLC v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 2021

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (rule 8 12(b)(6) case); Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Vilsack , 808 F.3d 905, 913 (D.C. … See id.; see also Browning, 292 F.3d at 242.

Bell & Howell Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Local 399, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

598 F.2d 136 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 18, 1979

In Handy Andy the Board recognized that denying certification to a victorious union is appropriate when necessary to' protect the Board’s processes. 228 N.L.R.B. at 454. 24 . R & M Kaufmann v. … The Board’s powers are remedial, not punitive, and the Board may not justify an order solely on the ground that it will deter future violations of the Act. Republic Steel Co. v.

Gomez v. United States

597 A.2d 884 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1991

I cite for that proposition Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 [ 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 ] [1983]. … Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1013 (D.C.1991).

United Food And Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Local 150-A, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

880 F.2d 1422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1989

See also NLRB v. … . v.

Adams v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2023

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Niskey v. Kelly, 859 F.3d 1, 7 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quoting Holland v.

Truck Drivers, Oil Drivers, Filling Station, Platform Workers' Union, Local 705 v. National Labor Relations Board

835 F.2d 367 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 30, 1987

835 F.2d 367 266 U.S.App.D.C. 303 Truck Drivers, Oil Drivers, Filling Station, Platform Workers' Union, Local 705 v. … National Labor Relations Board NO. 86-1254 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. SEP 30, 1987 Appeal From: N.L.R.B., 820 F.2d 448 1 ENFORCEMENT ORDERED.

Stewart v. United States

881 A.2d 1100 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2005

Accord, e.g., Adams v. … Brown would have behaved differently and chosen to testify at the trial. See Sykes v. United States, 585 A.2d 1335, 1340 (D.C.1991).

Zink v. Black Star Line, Inc.

18 F.2d 156 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 1927

It appears that the Shipping Board had incurred expenses to the amount of $875.34 in preparing the ship for delivery under the contract, and after the purchaser’s default the board offered to return the amounts, paid, less … . § 8146%aaa) authorizes the board to make such sales, and section 14 of the act (Comp.

Davis v. Department of Justice

606 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2009

Order, Davis v. Dep’t of Justice, Civ. No. 88-130 (D.D.C. … See Brown v. Sec’y of Army, 78 F.3d 645, 647 (D.C.Cir.1996). The Court of Appeals in Brown , according to the DOJ, distinguished Bradley because Bradley did not concern sovereign immunity.