Case law

State v. Brown

41 Minn. 319 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jul 22, 1889

State v. Lautenschlager, 22 Minn. 514, 526 . /TheJa.wlwill not, therefore, attempt to lay down a more specific rule. … See State v. Ryan, 13 Minn. 343 , (378.) The order and judgment are affirmed, and the case remanded to the district court of Clay county for further proceedings.

State v. . Brown

81 N.C. 568 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

C., 162; State v. Cox, 6 Ire., 440.

Brown v. Wood

121 Mass. 137 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 23, 1876

Jacobs v. Hesler, 113 Mass. 157 . … Bancroft v. Curtis, 108 Mass. 47 . Hayward v. Cain, 110 Mass. 273 . Exceptions sustained.

People v. Brown

185 A.D.3d 414 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 2, 2020

People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 03725 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 03725 Decided on July 2, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … Decided on July 2, 2020 Richter, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ. 11737 3086/17 [*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Phillip Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Janet E.

Brown v. State

276 Ga. 606 · Supreme Court of Georgia · May 19, 2003

State, 257 Ga. 775, 776 ( 364 SE2d 273 ) (1988). 11 See, e.g., McClellan v. State, 274 Ga. 819, 820 ( 561 SE2d 82 ) (2002). 12 United States v. Lanier, 520 U. … S. 259, 266 (117 SC 1219, 137 LE2d 432) (1997); see also Payne v.

Ehrsam v. Brown

64 Kan. 466 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Feb 8, 1902

Yours truly, Casper Brown.” “J. B. Ehrsam & Sons, Manufacturers of Mill Machinery. -Established 1872. Enterprise, Kan., March 20, 1899. “Mr. Gasper Brown, Oakley, Kan. … In the case of Rodgers v.

Brown v. State

290 Ga. 50 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 7, 2011

See Wilson v. Kemp, 288 Ga. 779, 781 ( 707 SE2d 336 ) (2011). However, contrary to Brown’s contention, the habeas court did not err by relying on the waiver of rights form signed by Brown. Unlike in State v. … ,” State v.

State v. Brown

279 Wis. 2d 102 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Mar 22, 2005

Brown also relies on State v. … See also Coston v. Joseph P., 222 Wis. 2d at 26 . State v. Watson, 227 Wis. 2d 167, 196, 212 , 595 N.W.2d 403 (1999). Brown cites Poluk v. J.N.

Brown v. Boyn (In Re Brown)

86 B.R. 944 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · May 25, 1988

Joseph and Kimberly Brown filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy on July 17, 1986. … By contrast, the Brown’s annuity payments are a windfall, in fact resulting from an activity that, while legal in Arizona, is illegal in Indiana. See, Ind. Const. Art. 15, § 8. See also, Kaszuba v.

Posson v. Brown

11 Johns. 166 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1814

As the judgment obtained before the other justice, (Hoes,) in favour of Posson against Brown, was given in evidence, it is most probable that the present suit was brought to recover back the money recovered of the plaintiff

State v. Brown

212 S.C. 237 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Apr 14, 1948

Oxnur, Justice: Appellant, John Brown, was jointly indicted with Russell Brown, Isaac Hill and R. B. Bennett, for the murder of Edward Speights. … He relies on a recent series of cases by the United States Supreme Court, beginning with Brown v. State of Mississippi, 297 U. S. 278 , 56 S. Ct. 461 , 80 L.

Herrin v. Brown

44 Fla. 782 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jun 15, 1902

Herrin would still have continued to be the head of a family after the death of his wife, and as such entitled to his homestead exemption, as was held in substance in the case of DeCottes v.

Brown v. Lord

7 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879

This court held in the case of Odell v. … (Wi lmer v. Farris, 40 Iowa, 309 .)

Marks v. Brown

3 A.D.3d 648 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 8, 2004

Brown and Sherill Brown for the January 2000 accident and defendant Gary H. Pickens (hereinafter defendant) for the July 2000 accident. … Elliott, 57 NY2d 230, 236 [1982]) “as to be considered insignificant within the meaning of Insurance Law 5102 (d)” (Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., supra at 353; see Mrozinski v St.

McCormick v. Brown

36 Cal. 180 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1868

(Bell v. Morrison, 1 Pet. 351 ; Sands v. Gelston, 15 John. 511 ; Jones v. Moore, 5 Binn. 573 ; Berghaus v. Calhoun, 6 Watts, 219 ; De Forrest v. Hunt, 8 Conn. 185 ; Russell v. Copp, 5 N. H. *186 154; Harrison v. … Handley, 1 Bibb. 443; Bell v. Rowland, 1 Hardin, 301 ; Aug. on Lim., Sec. 231, and note.)

Brown v. Cowell

116 Mass. 461 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 5, 1875

Jackson v. Stevens, 108 Mass. 94 . … See Dyer v. Shurtleff, 112 Mass.

Brown v. Kimmel

67 Mo. 430 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1878

(Wiggins v. Burkham, 10 Wallace 129.) … (White v. Hampton, 10 Iowa 238 .)

Brown v. State

917 So. 2d 272 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 16, 2005

917 So.2d 272 (2005) Richard Freeman BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D05-3114. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. December 16, 2005. Richard F. Brown, Bonifay, pro se. Charles J. … The Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed Brown's racketeering conviction and the petit theft conviction. See Brown v. State, 652 So.2d 877 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Brown v. State

264 Ind. 40 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1975

Chatman v. State, (1975) 263 Ind. 531 , 334 N.E.2d 673 ; Blackburn v. State, (1973) 260 Ind. 5 , 291 N.E.2d 686 . … Richard v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 534 , 319 N.E.2d 118 ; James v. State, (1974) 261 Ind. 495 , 307 N.E.2d 59 ; Webb v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 101 , 284 N.E.2d 812 .

Magill v. Brown

98 Ill. 235 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1881

Hossack, 40 Ill. 98 , and Hyde Park v. Dunham, 85 id. 571. It does not so appear. … The case is within and must be controlled by Hance v. Miller, 21 Ill. 636 , and Burst v. Wayne, 13 id. 664 .