Case law

State ex rel. Lockert v. Knott

631 S.W.2d 124 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1982

Sometime later, the GED just appeared in the defendant’s *126 mailbox in a plain brown, unstamped envelope, not addressed to anyone, and bearing no return address. … Trice v. McGill, 158 Tenn. 394, 398 , 13 S.W.2d 49 (Tenn.1929). State ex rel. Walls v. Cotter, 175 Tenn. 92 , 132 S.W.2d 210 (1939).

Smith v. LVNV Funding, LLC

2 F. Supp. 3d 1089 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 10, 2014

In Smith v. … Tennessee Collection Service Board, Clarification Statement of the Tennessee Collection Service Board Regarding Debt!

Thomas N. Allen v. Stanton Heidle, Warden

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 25, 2026

Code Ann. § 40-35-501(h)(1); Brown v. Jordan, 563 S.W.3d 196, 200 (Tenn. 2018). … See Brown, 563 S.W.3d at 200-01.

Sumner Co. Bd of Ed. v. Mansker Farms

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 10, 2002

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JULY 10, 2002 Session SUMNER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. … P. 13(d); see also Bank/First Citizens v. Citizens and Assoc., 82 S.W.3d 259, 262 (Tenn. 2002) (citing Bogan v. Bogan, 60 S.W.3d 721, 727 (Tenn. 2001)).

Brian Bacardi v. Bd. of Registration in Podiatry

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 19, 2003

BACARDI v. … In Baird v. Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins.

State v. Malone

928 S.W.2d 41 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 31, 1995

See Anderson v. … Frost v. State, 336 Md. 125 , 647 A.2d 106 (1994); see also Anderson v.

Stocklin, Y.Z. v. Barrett Distribution Centers, Inc.

2019 TN WC App. 22 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 10, 2019

Penny P% rson-Shrum Stocklin v. Barrett Distribution Centers, Inc. Docket No. 2017-08-1014 Monday, June 10, 2019 2:37:13 PM Klin v. Barrett Distribution Centers, Inc. … Al ls Boar inion. pdf im on m" In accordance with Rule 0800-02-22-.03(4), please find attached the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board in the referenced case.

Marshall & Bruce Co. v. City of Nashville

109 Tenn. 495 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1902

Rep., 222 ) : The board of education in Chicago entered into an agreement with a workingman’s union, known as the “Building Trades Council,” to the effect that the board would insert in all contracts for work on school buildings … The board accepted the higher or “union” bid. J. L. Adams, a taxpayer, thereupon filed a bill against Knisely and the board to enjoin the execution of the contract.

McGauvran, James v. ATOS Syntel, Inc.

2021 TN WC 225 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 10, 2021

ATOS appealed, and the Appeals Board vacated and remanded. … The Appeals Board has held that “a decision to award attorneys’ fees and expenses at an interlocutory stage of a case should be made only in extremely limited circumstances.” Travis v. Carter Express, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp.

Cutsinger, Christopher v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC

2024 TN WC App. 28 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 22, 2024

As the Tennessee Supreme Court explained in Keller v. … Dept. of Corr. v. Pressley, 528 S.W.3d 506, 513-14 (Tenn. 2017)).

Zussman v. Lake-Spiro-Shurman, Inc.

63 Tenn. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 25, 1970

Estoppel §§ 109, 110(2) Estoppel and Waiver, 28 Am.Jur.(2) 59 Hoyt v. Hoy*-, 213 Tenn. 117, 129 , 372 S.W.2d 300 Molloy v. City of Chattanooga, 191 Tenn. 173 , 232 S.W.2d 404 Doty v. … Chattanooga Union Railroad, 103 Tenn. 564 , 53 S.W. 944 Wyatt v. Brown, 39 Tenn.App. 28 , 281 S.W.2d 64 Balderacchi v. Ruth, 36 Tenn.App. 421, 425 , 256 S.W.2d 390 *676 Wilson v.

McCluen v. Roane County Times, Inc.

936 S.W.2d 936 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 9, 1996

McCluen’s father as Chairman of the Harriman Hospital Board and that Mr. McCluen had brought to the attention of the County Commission in its July 12,1993, meeting that Mr. … v.

Brooks v. Garner

566 S.W.2d 531 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1978

Barnes v. Dayton, 216 Tenn. 400 , 392 S.W.2d 813 (1965); DeCaro v. Collierville, 213 Tenn. 254 , 373 S.W.2d 466 (1963). … Lightman v. City of Nashville, 166 Tenn. 191 , 60 S.W.2d 161 (1933).

Luther Kirkwood v. Shelby County Government, d/b/a Shelby County Sheriff's Department, Jail Division

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 6, 2006

Rowe v. Board of Educ. of Chattanooga, 938 S.W.2d 351, 354 (Tenn.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1128, 117 S.Ct. 1271, 137 L.Ed.2d 349 (1997) (citing Board of Regents of State Colleges v. … v.

Kerrigan Iron Works, Inc. v. Cook Truck Lines, Inc.

41 Tenn. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 29, 1956

A. of L., Local 232 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 336 U. S. 245, 253 , 69 S. Ct. 516 , 93 L. Ed. 651 , 662; Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111, U. E. R. M. W. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 315 U. … W. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, supra, 336 U. S. 254 , 69 S. Ct. 521 , 93 L.

McDaniel v. General Care Corp.

627 S.W.2d 129 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 30, 1981

In other words, that is what the act says that he may read the result of the recommendation of the board and that is it. “MR. BUTLER: This is the recommendation of the board. “THE COURT: The recommendation of the board? … The cases of Baldwin v. Knight, Tenn., 569 S.W.2d 450 (1978) and Runnells v. Rogers, Tenn., 596 S.W.2d 87 (1980) both hold that the jury is entitled to give “weight, credit and value” to the review board’s report.

Roofire Alarm Company v. Royal Indemnity Company

202 F. Supp. 166 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 8, 1962

In the case of Roofire Alarm Co. v. … Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States, 221 U.S. 1 , 31 S.Ct. 502 , 55 L.Ed. 619 .

Hassell v. Sims

176 Tenn. 318 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1940

Clopton v. Clopton, supra; Bigley v. Watson, supra; Ryan v. Monaghan, supra. In 21 C. … Counsel for defendants insist that the limitation over is not too remote, and invoke the rule announced by this court in Brown v. Brown, 86 Tenn., 277 , 6 S. W., 869 , 870, 7 S. W., 640 .

Carnes v. Henderson

10 Tenn. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 15, 1929

Reinhart v. Nealis, 17 Pickle, 173 ; Kindell v. Titus, 9. Heiskell, 727; Polk v. Harrison, 16 Lea, 82 .” The case of Baskette v. Straight, 106 Tenn., 549 , ( 32 S. … Brown v. Brown, 101 Ind., 340 . Also a delay of twenty-one years will bar one because of laches. Brown’s Adoption, 25 Penn. Super, 259.

HOLLAND, JUDITH v. RANDSTAD

2025 TN WC 89 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 10, 2025

Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991). As shown below, all the factors favor Dr. Schroerlucke. Dr. … Schroerlucke’s specific board certification as a spine surgeon favors him on the factor of qualifications. Drs. Lochemes and Lager are board-certified orthopedic surgeons but without a certification in spine surgery.