Case law

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 2002

Neer v. Okla. Tax Comm'n, 982 P.2d 1071 , 1078 (Okla. 1999) (citation omitted). … Taylor v. Special Indem. Fund, 804 P.2d 431 , 432 (Okla. 1990) (citation omitted).

Town of Red Fork v. Gantt-Baker Co.

130 Okla. 175 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1928

Miller, Pres Board of “Trustees. Attest: W. S. “Fasholtz.” . … Rubber Co. v. City of Tulsa, 193 Okla. 163 , 229 Pac. 771 . See, also, Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. News Dispatch Co., 104 Okla. 260 , 231 Pac. 250 ; Haskins & Sells v. Okla. City, 36 Okla. 57 , 126 Pac. 204 .

Murray County v. Hood

163 Okla. 167 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1933

In Board of Trustees of Crutcho Township v. … J„ OULLISON, V. C. J., and SWINDALL. ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, and BUSBY, JJ., concur. BAYLESS, J., absent.

Murphy v. Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 2, 2024

See Brown v. Buhman, 822 F.3d 1151, 1162 n.9 (10th Cir. 2016). Erwin’s R. & R. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the specific issues raised in the Objection. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. … v.

Locke v. State

554 P.2d 847 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1976

An additional loan was denied whereupon the defendant left Brown’s place, only to return in a few minutes with a brown bag, identified as State’s Exhibit No. 4, containing three revolvers. … Story v. State, Okl.Cr., 478 P.2d 929 (1970); Woods v. State, Okl.Cr., 440 P.2d 994 (1968); Tilford v. State, Okl.Cr., 437 P.2d 261 (1968).

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 1994

OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD V. MOSS, 509 P.2D 666, 668 (OKLA.1973). … SEE OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION V. FORTINBERRY CO., 207 P.2D 301 (OKLA. 1949). THIS DOES NOT MEAN, HOWEVER, THAT THE BOARD IS REQUIRED, BY STATUTE OR RULE, TO TAKE POSSESSION OF STUDENT RECORDS WHEN A SCHOOL CLOSES.

Gilmer v. School Dist. No. 26, Noble County

41 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1913

Neither the statute quoted nor any other renders any act or proceeding of the board void because it is not recorded, nor makes the record of the board the only evidence of their actions” —citing Gillett v. … No. 2 v. Clark, 90 Mich. 435 , 51 N. W. 529 ; Indianapolis v. Imberry, 17 Ind. 175 ; School Dist. v. Atherton, 12 Metc. (Mass.) 113; Morgan v. Wilfley et al., 71 Iowa, 212 , 32 N. W. 265 ; Electric Co. v. Bd.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 1990

See, City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County, 8 P.2d 2 (Okla. 1932). … MITCHELL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 1 See, Abel v.

Terry v. Edgin

598 P.2d 228 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1979

Our Court cited Daniels v. Board of Education, 191 Mich. 339 , 158 N.W. 23 , L.R.A. 1916 F, 468, as authority for strict construction. … See: McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 (1968); City of Bethany v. Hill, Okl., 509 P.2d 1364 (1973).

Luna v. State

62 Okla. Crim. 435 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1937

In Rogers v. State, 57 Okla. … Kirk v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 281 , 135 Pac. 1156 ; State v. Wilks, 17 Okla. Cr. 247 , 187 Pac. 813 ; Wever v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 414 , 211 Pac. 1062 .” In Hanna v. State, 30 Okla.

Town of Buffalo v. Walker

126 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1925

(Garst v. Love. 6 Okla. 46 ; Light v. Conover, 10 Okla. 732 ; Trist v. Child. 12 Wall. 441 : Meguire v. Corwine, 101 U. S. 108 ; McCullen v. Hoffman, 174 U. S. 639 ).” See. also. A. T & S. F. R. Co. … Holmes, 18 Okla. 92 , 99 Pac. 22 ; Prince v. Gosnell, 19 Okla. 175 92 Pac. 164 ; Binswonger v. Stanford, 28 Okla. 429 , 114 Pac. 621 ; Bokoshe Coal Co. v. Morehead, 34 Okla. 424 , 126 Pac. 1033 .

Kimbrough v. Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 2, 2024

Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1161 n.5 (10th Cir. 2011) (citing Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 30, 112 S. … Corp. v.

Osborn v. Osborn

353 P.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1960

In Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Wilson, 172 Okl. 540 , 45 P.2d 750, 753 , the Court said: “In O’Neil v. … This is said in the fifth paragraph of the syllabus to Sears, Roebuck & Co. v.

Express Bus, Inc. v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

157 P.3d 1180 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 2007

T11 In Page v. … See also Duncan v. Powers Imports, 1994 OK 126 , 884 P.2d 854 ; *1185 Smith Bros. Road Constr. Co. v. Palmer, 1964 OK 26 , 389 P.2d 495 ; and Christesson Reporting Serv. v. Okla. Employment Sec.

Crowell v. State

6 Okla. Crim. 148 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1911

In support of this contention, counsel cite the cases of Hughes v. Territory, 8 Okla. 28 , 56 Pac. 708 , and Sullivan v. Territory, 8 Okla. 499, 58 Pac. 650 . … Kollenberger v. People [ 9 Colo. 233 ], 11 Pac. 101 ; Brown v. State [ 34 Neb. 448 ], 51 N. W. 1028 ; State v. Arnold [ 31 Neb. 75 ], 47 N. W. 694 .

City of Guthrie v. Wylie

6 Okla. 61 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1896

(Blackburn v. Oklahoma City, supra; Broughton v. Pensacola, 93 U. S. 265 ; Mobile v. Watson, 116 U. S. 289 ; Milner’s Admr. v. City of Pensacola, 2 Woods, 632 ; O’Connor v. Memphis, 6 La. 730 ; Mt. Pleasant v. … (Abbott v. Omaha Smelting Co., 4 Neb. 416 ; Childs v. Hurd, 32 W. Va. 66 ; Spencer v. Cook, 16 La. 163 ; Bigelow v. Gregory, 73 Ill. 197 .)

State Ex Rel. Sweeney v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp.

177 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1936

The pertinent charter provisions in force at the expiration of the franchise prohibited such use of the streets and alleys without a franchise granted by the board of commissioners, directed that it be the duty of the board … Mitchell v. City of Shawnee, 167 Okla. 582 , 31 P. (2d) 552 ; State ex rel. Baldwin v. City of Shawnee, 158 Okla. 173 , 13 P. (2d) 89 ; Buckeye Engine Co. v.

Park East Ltd. Co. v. Gordon

75 O.B.A.J. 223 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 2003

. *1033 T7 Appeal to the district court of an order of a county equalization board fixing the assessed valuation of property for ad valorem tax purposes is de novo. 68 O.S. 2001 § 2880.1(A); Jackson v. … Spears v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., 2008 OK 66, 12 , 73 P.3d 865, 867 ; see also Jackson, 1995 ¶ 12, 892 P.2d at 676 .

Jones v. Hanger

208 Okla. 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1953

refused to perform such ministerial duty for a reason *180 neither legally nor properly within the scope of its discretion, it may be compelled by mandamus to perform such ministerial duty. 34 Am.Jur. p. 863; Butterworth v. … S., 112 U.S. 50 , 5 S.Ct. 25 , 28 L.Ed. 656 ; Hopley, Treasurer, v. Benton, 38 Okl. 223 , 132 P. 808 ; Ryan v. Humphries, 50 Okl. 343 , 150 P. 1106 . Affirmed. HALLEY, C. J., JOHNSON, V. C.

Brennan v. Shanks

24 Okla. 563 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1909

Wallace v. Adams, 143 Fed. 721 , 74 C. C. A. 540 ; Leak v. Joslin, 20 Okla. (1 State) 200, 94 Pac. 518 ; United States et al. v. Citizens’ Trading Co., 19 Okla. 585 , 93 Pac. 448 . In the case of Brown v. … Braden, 11 Okla. 291 , 67 Pac. 476 ; Brown v. Hartshorn, 12 Okla. 123 , 69 Pac. 1049 ; McQuiston v. Walton, 12 Okla. 131 , 69 Pac. 1048 ; Bilyeu et ux. v. Pilcher, 16 Okla. 228 . 83 Pac. 546 .