Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMA

10,000+ results

5.54s

  • Clarke v. City of Fall River

    219 Mass. 580 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 31, 1914

    It was said by Chief Justice Shaw in Willard v. … There is nothing at variance with this result in Oliver v. Gale, 182 Mass. 39 , and Commercial Wharf Corp. v. Boston, 208 Mass. 482,488 , both somewhat relied upon by the defendant. 3.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. State Tax Commission

    370 Mass. 127 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 9, 1976

    Walsh v. Curcio, 358 Mass. 819 (1971). Neither the board nor this court, however, can create an exception to the time limit specified by the statutes. William Rodman & Sons v. … See Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 251 (1936); Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594, 604 (1953); Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. A.S. Abell Co., 218 Md. 273, 288-289 (1958).

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Comeau v. Town of Webster

    881 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 24, 2012

    Comeau”), collectively “Plaintiffs,” have brought suit against the Town of Webster, Massachusetts (‘Webster”), its Board of Selectmen (“Selectmen”), Board of Health (“Board of Health”), Police Chief Timothy Bent (“Chief Bent … assert virtually identical negligence claims against the Board of Selectmen (Count IV (first)), Police Department (Count IV (second)), the Board of Selectmen and Chief Bent (Count V), and against the Board of Health (Counts

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Clap v. Municipal Council

    310 Mass. 605 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 26, 1942

    Building Commissioner of Winchester, 306 Mass. 495 ; Tranfaglia v. … Turner v. Board of Appeals of Milton, 305 Mass. 189 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Rothschild v. Knight

    176 Mass. 48 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 15, 1900

    Chicago, Rock Island, & Pacific *54 Railway v. Sturm, 174 U. S. 710 . King v. Cross, 175 U. S. 396 . Cross v. Brown, 19 R. I. 220. … In Cross v. Brown, ubi supra, the subject was considered at length with a citation of the authorities, and this conclusion was reached. In Chicago, Rock Island, Pacific Railway v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Devlin v. Dalton

    41 L.R.A. 379 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 21, 1898

    People v. Hill, 126 N. Y. 497 . Simon v. Hoboken, 23 Vroom, 367 . A writ of certiorari does not lie to revise a decision of a question of fact upon evidence heard. Farmington River Water Power Co. v. … Since in these proceedings the board of examiners did not act as a court, his petition must fail, because a writ of certiorari is issued only to revise proceedings which are judicial in their nature. Attorney General v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Perkins v. Massachusetts Department of Revenue

    507 B.R. 45 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 7, 2014

    The decision in In re Brown In In re Brown, 489 B.R. 1 (Bankr.D.Mass.2013) (Hoffman, Bankr. … See Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 502 U.S. 129, 135-36 , 112 S.Ct. 515 , 116 L.Ed.2d 496 (1991); see also Lamie v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Savage v. Shaw

    195 Mass. 571 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 16, 1907

    Chase v. Curtis, 113 U. S. 452 . Leighton v. Campbell, 17 R. I. 51. Rohn v. Brown, 33 Mich. 257 . Cable v. McCune, 26 Mo. 371 . Calle v. Gaty, 34 Mo. 573 . Doolittle v. Marsh, 11 Neb. 243 . … Bohn v. Brown, 33 Mich. 257 .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Higgins v. License Commissioners of Quincy

    308 Mass. 142 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 27, 1941

    The power of the board to proceed is measured by the statute; compliance with it is essential, if the action of the board is to be valid. Tucker v. Boston, 223 Mass. 478 . Thomas v. … But if the board did impose certain conditions, Commonwealth v. Willcutt, 259 Mass. 406 ; Leach v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Lawton v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America

    924 F. Supp. 331 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 10, 1996

    In Blare v. … Soule favored Chris Brown because of his family relationship to another State Mutual executive.” Defendant’s Memorandum at 17-18. In Foster v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Pagan v. Dubois

    884 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 11, 1995

    Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, 10 , 87 S.Ct. 1817, 1822 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1967); Hill v. Texas, 316 U.S. 400 , 62 S.Ct. 1159 , 86 L.Ed. 1559 (1942); Strauder v. … Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 ; 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), ruled that the separation of persons by race would no longer be tolerated in this land.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. BD. OF APPEALS OF AMHERST

    360 Mass. 604 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 13, 1971

    Zaltman v. Board of Appeals of Stoneham, 357 Mass. 482 . Gulf Oil Corp. v. Board of Appeals of Framingham, 355 Mass. 275 . MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of Duxbury, 356 Mass. 635 . Brockton Pub. Mkt. Inc. v. … Gulf Oil Corp. v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Crowninshield

    68 L.R.A. 245 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 5, 1905

    In Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Stodder, 2 Cush. 562 , 570.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sterling

    233 Mass. 485 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 11, 1919

    Jordan v. Dennis, 7 Met. 590 . Gilman v. Thompson, 11 Vt. 643, 647 . … See Boston Diatite Co. v. Florence Manuf. Co. 114 Mass. 69 ; Palmer v. Lavers, 218 Mass. 286 ; Currier v. Esty, 110 Mass. 536 ; Amherst College v. Allen, 165 Mass. 178 .

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Fisher v. Lint

    69 Mass. App. Ct. 360 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jun 19, 2007

    See Butz. v. … to a military court martial board.”

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Kirane v. City of Lowell

    622 F. Supp. 262 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 25, 1985

    George Kirane (“Kirane”) brings this action against the City of Lowell (“Lowell”), the members of its Planning Board, the members of its Zoning Board of Appeals, the Assistant City Manager, and several building inspectors … Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591, 597 , 16 S.Ct. 644, 647 , 40 L.Ed. 819 (1896).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Colpitts v. L. C. Fisher Co.

    289 Mass. 232 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 10, 1935

    Curtis v. Brown, 5 Cush. 488 , 492. Furbish v. Goodnow, 98 Mass. 296 . Ames v. Foster, 106 Mass. 400 . Richardson v. Robbins, 124 Mass. 105 . A promise by an owner (Gill v. Herrick, 111 Mass. 501 ; Collins v. … Fish v. Thomas, 5 Gray, 45 . Fears v. Story, 131 Mass. 47 . Burr v. Wilcox, 13 Allen, 269 . Wills v. Brown, 118 Mass. 137 . See v. Downey, 256 Mass. 47 . See also Mackin v. Dwyer, 205 Mass. 472, 476 .

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Dittemore v. Dickey

    249 Mass. 95 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 21, 1924

    In O’Dowd v. … Ham v. Boston Board of Police, 142 Mass. 90 . Decisions of that class are distinguishable from the case at bar. 5.

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Pheasant Ridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Burlington

    399 Mass. 771 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 30, 1987

    L. c. 40A, § 20, in lieu of making application to various municipal boards. The details of the handling of such an application, including any appeal from its denial, are spelled out in Board of Appeals of Hanover v. … Milton Commons Assocs. v. Board of Appeals of Milton, 14 Mass. App. Ct. 111, 115 (1982).

    Cited 89 timesPublished
  • Almeida v. Travelers Insurance

    383 Mass. 226 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 31, 1981

    Franklin v. North Weymouth Coop. Bank, 283 Mass. 275, 280 (1933). The only questionable *230 elements here are the identity of the causes of action and whether the board is a “court of competent jurisdiction.” … Travelers has suggested no alternate explanation of the board’s finding and order. 3 See, e.g., CIBA Corp. v.

    Cited 51 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.