Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersIL

10,000+ results

3.93s

  • McCLELLEN v. BOARD OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF BELLEVILLE

    358 Ill. App. 3d 1193 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 26, 2005

    App.3d 1193 McCLELLEN v. BOARD OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF BELLEVILLE. No. 5-02-0780. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. July 26, 2005. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cathedral Trading, LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange

    199 F. Supp. 2d 851 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 30, 2002

    Corp. v. Shell Oil Co., 998 F.2d 391 , 395 & n. 7 (7th Cir.1993). The inquiry is fact intensive and “no single factor is conclusive.” Sanner v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 62 F.3d 918, 927 (7th Cir.1995). … Bowl-O-Mat, 429 U.S. at 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690 (citing Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962)).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bell v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund

    398 Ill. App. 3d 758 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 19, 2010

    Wendl v. Moline Police Pension Board, 96 Ill. App. 3d 482, 486 , 421 N.E.2d 584, 587 (1981). … Keller v. Retirement Board of the Firemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund, 245 Ill. App. 3d 48, 53-54 , 614 N.E.2d 323, 327 (1993); Barry v. Retirement Board of the Firemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund, 357 Ill.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Illinois State Board of Health v. People

    102 Ill. App. 614 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 2, 1902

    Dental Examiners v. The People ex rel., 123 Ill. 227 ; State ex rel. Johnson v. Lutz, 136 Mo. 633 . … People ex rel. v. Dental Examiners, 110 Ill. 180 ; Dental Examiners v. People ex rel., 123 Ill. 227 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilfert v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund

    263 Ill. App. 3d 539 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 25, 1994

    (Evert v. Board of Trustees of the Fire Fighters’ Pension Fund (1989), 180 Ill. App. 3d 656, 661 , 536 N.E.2d 143, 146 .) … (Kellan v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Pension Fund (1990), 194 Ill. App. 3d 573, 584-85 , 551 N.E.2d 264, 271 .)

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Illinois

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jul 6, 2020

    P. 41(b); Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1 Plaintiff was released after filing this action. (Doc. 8). 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994); Lucien v. … If Brown chooses to appeal, he will be liable for the $505.00 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. FED.R.APP.P. 3(e); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); Ammons v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Miller v. Board of Education of School District Number 132

    98 Ill. App. 2d 305 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 3, 1968

    The ensuing litigation has now produced three appeals — Miller v. Board of Education, 37 Ill App2d 451, 186 NE2d 790 ; Miller v. … Individual school boards are thereafter free to prepare pay schedules not inconsistent with the statute. Richards v. Board of Education, 21 Ill2d 104, 171 NE2d 37 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Local 701 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

    996 F. Supp. 781 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 13, 1998

    Brown alleges that the union engaged in unfair hiring hall practices. As to the CBA, that claim constitutes a breach of the union’s duty of fair representation. Daniels v. … Brown’s argument that we should apply instead the two-year state limitations period for personal injury actions to Counts I and II, as was done in Stevens v. Northwest Indiana Dist.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • DiFiore v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund

    313 Ill. App. 3d 546 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 12, 2000

    App. 3d 180, 189-90 , 596 N.E.2d 691 (1992), Stec v. Oak Park Police Pension Board, 204 Ill. App. 3d 556 , 561 N.E.2d 1234 (1990), and Hahn v. Police Pension Fund, 138 Ill. … In Kerner v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Shilvock v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund

    301 Ill. App. 84 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 21, 1939

    Upon the question of a writ of certiorari and the question as to what the record which this writ brings up must show if the proceedings are to be sustained, the Supreme Court said in Funkhouser v. … It was the duty of the Board to pass upon this question, and in entering an order it was necessary that it comply with the rule stated in Carroll v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lord v. Board of Trade of Wichita

    62 Ill. App. 526 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 11, 1896

    Diennan v. Bunn, 124 Ill. 175 ; 1 Ch. Pl. 352, Ed. 1883; Ch. Cont. 920 et seq.; Steele v. Hobbs, 16 Ill. 59 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Werlick

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Apr 6, 2020

    Brown, No. 01-cr-00196-JPS-1 (E.D. Wis. 2002) (“Criminal Case”). Brown argues that his sentence was unlawfully enhanced according to the ruling in Mathis v. … Because Brown makes no argument arising out of Mathis or any other new case of statutory construction, he cannot meet the Davenport requirements for bringing a Section 2241 petition. Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Leetaru v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

    2015 IL 117485 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jul 1, 2015

    City of Chicago v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, 293 Ill. App. 3d at 902-03. … Board of Regents of Northern Illinois University, 71 Ill. App. 3d 998, 1000 (1979)). See also Liebman v. Board of Governors of State Colleges & Universities, 79 Ill.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Olds v. Chicago Open Board of Trade

    18 Ill. App. 465 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 31, 1886

    plaintiff of his ticket of membership in said Open Board of Trade, and for causing him to be suspended from said Open Board unlawfully and without due notice and in violation of the rules and regulations of said Board of … The People v. Village of Crotty, 93 Ill. 190 ; Kilgore v. Ferguson, 77 Ill. 213 ; 1 Chitty’s Pleadings, 245. The allegations that defendants combined or conspured will not sustain an action.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Board of Review of Department of Labor

    132 Ill. App. 3d 853 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 2, 1985

    A Department of Labor referee affirmed the adjudicator’s decision as did the Board of Review. In an appeal under the Administrative Review Law (Ill. Rev. … (Wall v. Chicago Park District (1941), 378 Ill. 81, 96 .) There are no special circumstances of record to justify equitable relief in the present case. Accordingly, the doctrine of laches is inapplicable.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cook County Republican Party v. Board of Election Commissioners

    223 F. Supp. 3d 713 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 22, 2016

    Thereafter the GOP filed this action to enjoin further proceedings by the Board in No. 2016-EB-RES-01 (referred to as Sapone v. … in Sapone v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Hettleman v. Board of County Commissioners

    102 Ill. App. 2d 310 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 18, 1968

    Hannawell v. Dimmick, 35 Ill App2d 10, 181 NE2d 825 (abstract). … Chillicothe Tp. v. Board of Review of Peoria County, 19 Ill2d 424, 167 NE2d 553 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mohr v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees

    99 F. Supp. 2d 934 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 12, 2000

    Sheehan v. Donlen Corp., 173 F.3d 1039, 1044 (7th Cir.1999). Ms. Mohr’s direct evidence is the remark in the dismissal letter that the Board intended to “turn over of the staff to reculture the school.” … See City of Oklahoma City v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    2022 IL App (1st) 190991-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 12, 2022

    People v. McLaurin, 2020 IL 124563, ¶ 22 (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979)). … See People v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Columbia Graphophone Co. v. Niergarth

    201 Ill. App. 397 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 10, 1916

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.