Case law

Ivy v. Army Times Publishing Co.

428 A.2d 831 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1981

Motorola, Inc., 74 Ill.2d 172 , 23 Ill.Dec. 559 , 384 N.E.2d 353 (1979); Harless v. First National Bank, 246 S.E.2d 270 (W.Va.1978); Brown v. Transcom Lines, 284 Or. 597 , 588 P.2d 1087 (1978); Trombelta v. … Comment, Kelsay v.

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Northwest Engineering Company, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Northwest Engineering Company, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

376 F.2d 770 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 21, 1967

376 F.2d 770 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Northwest Engineering Company, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … case of NLRB v.

National Treasury Employees Union v. United States Merit Systems Protection Board and United States Office of Personnel Management

743 F.2d 895 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 11, 1984

United States v. Johnson, 696 F.2d 115, 120 (D.C.Cir.1982); cf. American Postal Workers Union v. … Gage v.

Hayde v. Boynton

26 F.2d 978 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1928

Brown (employees under Boynton in the Shipping Board), Croll, Boynton, and Larson. Subsequently Hayde was made a party. All of these parties, but Hayde and Boynton, have been eliminated. … The Assistant Commissioner affirmed the Board.

Friend v. Britton

220 F.2d 820 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 1955

Our task is to ascertain whether the Deputy Commissioner’s findings are supported by substantial evidence upon the record considered as a whole, O’Leary v. Brown-Pacifie-Maxon, 340 U. … For subsequent history see National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Camera Corp., 2 Cir., 190 F.2d 429 . .

United States v. District of Columbia

654 F.2d 802 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 1981

Brown v. Neeb, 25 Fair Empl. … In Brown v.

Amobi v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections

882 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 9, 2012

COLUMBIA STEPHEN IFEANYI AMOBI * NGOZI AMOBI * * * v … See, e.g., Howard Univ. v. Best, 484 A.2d 958, 985 (D.C. 1984). Here, there is no evidence that any of the defendants engaged in extreme or outrageous conduct or that Amobi suffered severe emotional distress.

Elastic Stop Nut Division Of Harvard Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

921 F.2d 1275 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1990

NLRB v. Bausch and Lomb, Inc., 526 F.2d 817, 821 (2d Cir.1975). The question for the Board to consider is "whether the employer's actions are motivated by anti-union considerations." Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. … United States v. L.A.

Local 28, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Inc., Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Associated Maritime Worrers, Local No. 3, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Inc., Afl-Cio, Ingram Barge Company v. National Labor Relations Board

321 F.2d 376 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1963

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ASSOCIATED MARITIME WORRERS, LOCAL NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, INC., AFL-CIO, Respondent. INGRAM BARGE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, 322 U.S. 111, at 130 , 64 S.Ct. 851, at 860 , 88 L.Ed. 1170 (1944).

Corbett v. Kinlein

191 A.2d 246 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 28, 1963

While the procedure of the Board may be informal, it must conform to recognized standards of fairness and a record must be made which permits review of the Board’s action by the court 11 Reversed and remanded for proceedings … Goldsmith v. Clabaugh, 55 App.D.C. 346, 348 , 6 F.2d 94, 96 (1925). 10 . But see, Andrews v. State Board of Registration, etc., 123 Cal.App.2d 685 , 267 P.2d 352 (1954). 11 . Perpente v.

Williams v. Mount Jezreel Baptist Church

589 A.2d 901 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1991

See Mount Jezreel Christians Without a Home v. Board of Trustees of Mount Jezreel Baptist Church, 582 A.2d 237, 239 (D.C.1990); supra note 4. … V.

Capital Traction Co. v. Morgan

44 App. D.C. 237 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 1915

The defendant, having taken on more passengers than it could seat, a by no means uncommon occurrence, had no right to move those passengers about as pawns upon a chess board. … Stowe v. Heywood, 7 Allen, 118 ; Brown v. Hannibal & St. J. R. Co. 99 Mo. 319 , 12 S. W. 655 ; Western U. Teleg. Co. v. Adams, 75 Tex. 531 , 6 L.R.A. 844 , 16 Am. St. Rep. 920 , 12 S. W. 857 ; McCoy v.

In Re Estate of Chuong

623 A.2d 1154 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1993

BROWN, et al., Appellants, v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. Nos. 89-PR-1511, 90-CV-433. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued En Banc December 4, 1991. Decided March 2, 1993. … Browns' claims of negligence.

Williams v. United States

483 A.2d 292 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1984

Warren v. United States, 436 A.2d 821, 836-37 (D.C.1981); Rease v. United States, 403 A.2d 322, 327 (D.C.1979). … United States, 434 A.2d 449, 459 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1037 , 102 S.Ct. 580 , 70 L.Ed.2d 483 (1981); we remand with instructions to vacate the armed burglary conviction, Brown v.

Koretoff v. Schaefer

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2009

The almond marketing order, 7 C.F.R. § 981.1 et seq., regulates the handling of almonds grown in California and is administered locally by the Almond Board of California (the “Board”), a ten-member board composed of growers … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 453 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (citation omitted). Likewise, plaintiffs’ reliance on Arbaugh v.

Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, West Texas Utilities Company, Intervenor

114 F.3d 206 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 23, 1997

The Board’s approach is consistent with this scholarship and with the Commission’s precedents, see Coal Trading Corp. v. … V We turn finally to Burlington Northern’s claim that the Board dictated the railroad’s terms of service under the rate prescribed in the Board’s order.

Warehouse Union, Local 860, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

652 F.2d 1022 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1981

B. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., 396 U.S. 258, 263 , 90 S.Ct. 417, 420 , 24 L.Ed.2d 405 (1969). The Board-imposed remedy does not fit within this category. … An award of backpay is within the authority of the Board and in keeping with the policies of the Act. N. L. R. B. v.

United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Florida Steel Corporation, Intervenor. Florida Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Intervenor

646 F.2d 616 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 25, 1981

P 12,590 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Florida Steel Corporation, Intervenor. FLORIDA STEEL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. … Just as that is a vital consideration in determining the validity of a no-solicitation rule, see Republic Aviation Corp. v. Labor Board, supra, at 797-798 ( 65 S.Ct. at 985 ); Labor Board v.

Thomas, Oscar v. Principi, Anthony

394 F.3d 970 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 2005

In Price v . … Zuspann v. Brown, 60 F.3d 1156, 1161 (5th Cir. 1995) (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Sugrue v. Derwinski, 26 F.3d 8, 12-13 (2d Cir. 1994).

Bufco Corp v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1998

NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 452 (8th Cir. 1963); see also NLRB v. Laredo Packing Co., 730 F.2d 405, 407 (5th Cir. 1984); Bagel Bakers Council, 555 F.2d at 305. … do Packing Co., 730 F.2d at 407; NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d at 454; NLRB v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc., 366 F.2d 809, 813 (5th Cir. 1966).