Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.48s
People v. Linda B. (In Re Linda B.)
91 N.E.3d 813 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2017
This exception must be construed narrowly and established by a clear showing of each criterion. Andrew B., 237 Ill. 2d at 347. … In order to establish untimely filing of the May 9 petition, respondent had to establish that her initial period of hospitalization and psychiatric treatment was involuntary.
Cited 8 timesPublished184 Ill. App. 3d 33 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 8, 1989
This holding is clearly against the manifest weight of the evidence in light of our holding in People v. Bates (1987), 165 Ill. App. 3d 80 , 518 N.E.2d 628 . … Contrary to the trial court’s holding, the State has no obligation to establish a foundation for the admission of test results at a statutory summary suspension hearing unless the motorist first establishes a prima facie
Cited 2 timesPublished48 Ill. Ct. Cl. 376 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 23, 1995
In affirming the trial courts dismissal of the suit, the appellate court held that the doctrine of sovereign immunity applied to bar a claim against the trooper in circuit court because the trooper had been performing one … While we express sympathy for plaintiff in this case, our duty is to adhere to our clearly established precedent.” (Sepmeyer v. Holman (1994), 162 Ill. 2d 249, 256 , 642 N.E.2d 1242, 1245 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished443 Ill. Dec. 626 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 19, 2020
The United States Supreme Court, however, has clearly recognized a few exceptions to the warrant requirement. Jones, 215 Ill. 2d at 269. ¶ 21 One exception was recognized in Carroll v. … The Act permits possession of a determinative amount of cannabis for registered, qualifying patients. 410 ILCS 130/25(a) (West 2016).
Cited 71 timesPublished240 B.R. 290 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 29, 1999
qualifies for protection from avoidance under § 547(c)(1). … Clearly, paying a supplier of products or services used in the everyday business qualifies as the ordinary course of business of the debtor. The issue is less clear, however, when more unusual situations are involved.
Cited 19 timesPublishedColeman v. East Joliet Fire Protection District
46 N.E.3d 741 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 22, 2016
Accordingly, no tort action could be maintained against units of local government that were established by the State. … Whether a plaintiff can establish that a local public entity owed a duty is a separate and distinct inquiry from the issue of whether defendants can claim a statutory immunity is available as a defense.
Cited 14 timesUnpublished108 F. Supp. 3d 613 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 4, 2015
The statute “at least theoretically establishes virtually complete immunity for a service provider that obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to e-mail that is in electronic storage in its system.” … Section 2510(17)(A) is clearly inapposite to this case as the communications allegedly accessed here had previously been transmitted to their send *618 er.
Cited 10 timesPublishedNwoke v. The Consulate of Nigeria, NY
District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 27, 2018
Under FSIA’s burden-shifting framework, the party asserting immunity bears the initial burden of establishing that it satisfies FSIA’s definition of a foreign state. See Enahoro v. … claim, those claims do qualify as torts.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCarroll v. Vernon (In Re Vernon)
192 B.R. 165 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 26, 1996
Each element must be established by a preponderance of the evidence. Grogan, 498 U.S. at 285 , 111 S.Ct. at 658 . 12. … That clearly posed a threat to its fees, both those *173 earned in the past and those about to be earned.
Cited 16 timesPublishedRand McNally & Co. v. Fleet Management Systems, Inc.
591 F. Supp. 726 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 31, 1983
More than one may be referred to provide the rate tariff clearly specifies the circumstances under which each guide will apply. … Use may be clearly outside of the subject matter of copyright.
Cited 19 timesPublished988 N.E.2d 745 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 22, 2013
Amanda clearly had a motive to lie when she spoke with police. The beginning of the interview therefore does not qualify as an admissible prior consistent statement. … Those statements would have established the context of the statements the State wanted the jury to hear and would have qualified those statements in the context of Amanda’s overall credibility.
Cited 18 timesPublishedWoods v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO.
523 F. Supp. 2d 812 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 18, 2007
The holding of Thompson clearly bars the Stearneys’ claim that the January 2006 agreement is enforceable. … qualified in a particular matter.
Cited 6 timesPublishedEqual Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ceisel Masonry, Inc.
594 F. Supp. 2d 1018 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 23, 2009
Continuous subjection to such graffiti clearly could suffice to demonstrate a hostile work environment. See Cerros, 398 F.3d at 951 (“If ... … The comments appearing in the port-a-potties represent a litany of the most offensive and clearly racial epithets possible.
Cited 2 timesPublished47 Ill. 2d 120 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1970
The defendant, in conjunction with the remand, was to receive a new trial only if the witness’s statement was found in the police department files and was otherwise qualified for impeachment purposes. … It was clearly incumbent upon defendant to present any further mitigating circumstances (People v.
Cited 50 timesPublished119th & Halsted Currency Exchange v. Blake-Ware (In Re Blake-Ware)
155 B.R. 476 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · May 11, 1993
Such assertions clearly qualify as statements under § 523(a)(2)(A). … See Harasymiw, 895 F.2d at 1174 (refusal to overturn lower court’s decision based on the plaintiff’s compliance with its establishing lending procedures).
Cited 3 timesPublishedRetail Liquor Dealers Protective Ass'n v. Fleck
408 Ill. 219 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1951
commission pass upon the qualifications of an applicant for State liquor retailer’s license, (other than manufacturers, distributors or importing distributors, nonbeverage users, railroads and boats for which authority is clearly … Section 7a of article VII is authority for the establishing of a license appeal commission for each city, village or incorporated town having a population of over 200,000, and the next section provides for an appeal by any
Cited 8 timesPublishedBraye v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
175 Ill. 2d 201 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1997
As such, an employer’s potential for tort liability exists unless and until the defense of the Workers’ Compensation Act is established. Doyle, 101 Ill. 2d at 10-11 . … ADM argues that its third-party complaint clearly states that it is seeking contribution consistent with the Contribution Act.
Cited 101 timesPublished377 Ill. 44 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1941
The complaint alleges that the deed made by the executor is void for certain irregularities in his qualifying, but this is not‘argued in the brief. The will of Stephen E. … Other propositions are argued, but we deem it unnecessary to discuss them in this opinion, as the foregoing establishes clearly that the decree of the circuit court of Marion county was correct.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRotary International v. Paschen
14 Ill. 2d 480 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1958
These payments are the established obligation of each club and are neither gratuities nor gifts. … In order to qualify property for exemption from taxation, the benefits must accrue to mankind directly and it is not enough that incidental benefits may come to the public as a result of its use.
Cited 22 timesPublished741 F. Supp. 698 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 19, 1990
But this Court need not rely solely on Nelsons’ assertion of absolute privilege, because their in-flight comments clearly meet the requirements of qualified privilege. 3. Qualified Privilege Babb v. … All Nelsons’ statements were made subject to either an absolute or at least a qualified privilege.
Cited 32 timesPublished
Ask Donna