Case law

Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Potts

119 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 1993

The Board was not required to address the other factors. 2 Affirmed. 1 ORS 701.025 was renumbered ORS 670.600 in 1991. 2 Liberty relies on Timberline Lodge v. Kyle, 97 Or App 239 , 775 P2d 899 (1989). … We remanded the case, because the Board had not made specific findings as to some of the required factors.

Watkins v. Josephine County

243 Or. App. 52 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 25, 2011

Holdner v. … E.g., Strunk, 338 Or 145 ; Oregon State Police Officers’ Assn., 323 Or 356 ; Lauderdale v. Eugene Water and Electric Board, 217 Or App 551 , 177 P3d 13 (2008). Those cases are inapposite.

Reynolds v. Employment Department

243 Or. App. 88 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 25, 2011

After we affirmed without opinion, the Supreme Court vacated our decision and remanded for reconsideration in light of McDowell v. Employment Dept., 348 Or 605 , 236 P3d 722 (2010). … The board made no findings regarding that policy.

Or. & Cal. R. R. v. Lane County

23 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1893

Bank v. Jordan, 16 Or. 115 ( 17 Pac. Rep. 621 ). 3. … In Railroad Co. v.

Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Molena

166 Or. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 5, 2000

See Burris v. SAIF Corp., 116 Or App 498, 500 , 841 P2d 696 (1992), rev den 315 Or 442 (1993); Morrow v. Pacific University, 100 Or App 198, 200 , 785 P2d 787 (1990). … The Board’s finding is supported by substantial evidence, as the portion of the ALJ’s opinion quoted above demonstrates. See Dietz v.

Shelton v. Armenakis

146 Or. App. 521 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1997

Bedell v. Schiedler, 307 Or 562, 564 , 770 P2d 909 (1989). … Rios v. Mazur-Hart, 124 Or App 193, 194 , 859 P2d 1204 (1993).

State v. Haydon

113 Or. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 20, 1992

Except as provided in ORS 137.671 [authorizing departure sentences], the incarcerative guidelines and any other guidelines so designated by the board shall be mandatory and constitute presumptive sentences.” … State v. Turner, 247 Or 301 , 429 P2d 565 (1967); State v.

Jakob v. Dunes City

51 Or. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 6, 1981

the following statement (labeled by LCDC to be a "determination”): "The Land Conservation and Development Commission was unable to concur in any action on the allegations of *508 goal violations in LUBA 80-032, Dunes City v. … The commission shall issue its determination on the recommendation of the board and return the determination to the board for inclusion in the board’s order under section 5 of this 1979 Act within such time as is necessary

Sullivan v. Argonaut Insurance

73 Or. App. 694 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1985

The Board properly reversed that decision, citing Roy McFerran, Jr., 34 Van Natta 621 (1982), aff’d without opinion, McFerran v. SAIF, 60 Or App 786 , 655 P2d 230 (1982). … See Alvarez v. GAB Business Services, Inc., 72 Or App 524 , 696 P2d 1131 (1985); Maarefi v. SAIF, 69 Or App 527, 531 , 686 P2d 1055 (1984).

American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of Lebanon

265 Or. App. 288 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 4, 2014

The board relied upon OPEU v. … Specifically, the union cites National Labor Relations Board v.

Christenson v. Thompson

143 Or. App. 483 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 11, 1996

Meadows v. Schiedler, 143 Or App 213 , 924 P2d 314 (1996). The court erred in dismissing plaintiffs petition. … Reversed and remanded. 1 We have rejected plaintiffs argument made to the trial court that denial of direct judicial review of the Board’s decision violated ex post facto and due process protections. Shelby v.

Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum Motorwerks, Inc.

135 Or. App. 67 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 21, 1995

In determining whether a claimant’s occupational disease is work-related, the Board should consider all employment exposure, including out-of-state employment exposure. Silveira v. … Corp. v. Short, 102 Or App 495, 499 , 795 P2d 118 (1990); Holden v.

United Airlines v. Clark

240 Or. App. 13 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

See Schoch v. Leupold & Stevens, 325 Or 112, 118 , 934 P2d 410 (1997) (substantial reason requirement necessitates “a sufficient explanation to allow a reviewing court to examine the agency’s action”). … We conclude that the record as a whole contains substantial evidence to support the board’s findings. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill, 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). Affirmed.

Urness v. Liberty Northwest Insurance

130 Or. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 5, 1994

Corp. v. Golden, 116 Or App 64 , 840 P2d 1362 (1992), rev den 315 Or 442 (1993), and we summarize those facts necessary for our review. … Liberty Northwest Corporation v. Golden, supra, 116 Or App at 67-68 .

Armstrong v. State Accident Insurance Fund

58 Or. App. 602 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 18, 1982

Relying on Stroh v. SAIF, 1471 Or 117 , 492 P2d 472 (1972); Wisherd v. Paul Koch Volkswagen, 28 Or App 513 , 559 P2d 1305 (1977); and Stevens v. … Relying principally on Lindsey v.

SAIF Corp. v. Drury

202 Or. App. 14 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 2005

SAIF v. Lewis, 335 Or 92 , [ 58 P3d 814 ] (2002).” SAIF then appealed the ALJ’s order to the Workers’ Compensation Board. … ORAP 5.45(1); Clinical Research Institute v. Kemper Ins. Co., 191 Or App 595, 608-09 , 84 P3d 147 (2004).

Sweeney v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 090313c (or.tax 6-30-2009)

Oregon Tax Court · Jun 30, 2009

Plaintiff did not appeal to the county board of property tax appeals (board) in 2006 because she was unaware of the appeal process until after the December 31, 2006, board petition deadline. … See Lee's v. Dept. of Rev. , TC 4830, WL 924976 *1 (Apr 6, 2009) (ruling that statutes do not permit taxpayers to appeal "their own actions in agreeing to values."). B.

Tri-Met, Inc. v. Albrecht

308 Or. 185 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1989

Tri-Met, Inc. v. Albrecht, 95 Or App 155 , 768 P2d 421 (1989). We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the board’s award. … Nor do we see the board’s decision as an exercise of agency “discretion.”

State v. O'BRIEN

262 Or. 30 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1972

Brown v. Bryant, 244 Or 321 , 417 P2d 1002 (1966); 1 Greenleaf on Evidence 330, § 197 (16th ed 1899). … Brown v. Bryant, supra at 325 ; Klever v. Elliott et al, 212 Or 490 , 320 P2d 263 , 70 ALR2d 1094 (1958); Johnson v.

Apalategui v. Washington County

80 Or. App. 508 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 6, 1986

In Jefferson Landfill Comm. v. … Compare Wagner v. Marion County, 79 Or App 233 , 719 P2d 31 (1986).