Case law

J.R.M., Inc. v. City of Portland

669 A.2d 159 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 26, 1995

In Mitchell v. … (quoting Hall v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 266 (Me.1985)). III.

Hilly v. City of Portland

582 A.2d 1213 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 29, 1990

See State v. Brown, 571 A.2d 816, 817 (Me.1990). Rather, it is subject to reasonable regulation consistent with the State’s police power to promote public health, welfare, safety, and morality. Id. at 820 . … See Carson v. State, 241 Ga. 622, 628 , 247 S.E.2d 68, 73 (1978); Matthews v. State, 237 Ind. 677, 686-87 , 148 N.E.2d 334, 338 (1958); State v. LaChapelle, 234 Neb. 458 , 451 N.W.2d 689, 691 (1990).

Nadeau v. Maine Bd. of Dental Exam'rs

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 24, 2009

See New England Whitewater Ctr., Inc. v. … Petitioner points the Court to York Hosp. v.

State v. Huntley

681 A.2d 10 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 30, 1996

In Chapman v. … Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673 , 106 S.Ct. 1431 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986). See also Brown v.

Inh. of the Town of Milford and City of Old Town v. PPL Maine

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 8, 2012

This Court reviews the Board's decision directly for "abuse of discretion, error of law, or findings not supported by the evidence." Rangeley Crossroads Coal. v. … Id; Waterville Homes, 655 A.2d at 367; Yusem v.

Chamberlain v. Harriman

165 A.3d 351 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 22, 2017

Collins v. … See Brown v. Habrle, 2010 ME 72, ¶ 20 , 1 A.3d 401 (holding that a spouse became a judgment debtor as, of the date that a post-judgment grace period for a property disposition payment expired); Raymond v.

Ashby v. Rust Engineering Co.

559 A.2d 774 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 1989

Finally, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. … See Libby v. G.T.E. Sylvania, No. 83-98 (Me.Workers’ Comp.Comm’n App.Div. Oct. 7, 1983).

Jonas Edwards & Son v. Pinkham

113 Me. 4 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 18, 1915

Hull v. Sturdivant et al., 59 Maine, 172; Ross v. Brown, 74 Maine, 352; Mellen v. Moore, 68 Maine, 390.

Livonia v. Town of Rome

707 A.2d 83 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 27, 1998

McAfee v. Cole, 637 A.2d 463, 465 (Me.1994) (quoting Hall v. Board of Envtl. … In Robinson v.

Old Point, Inc. v. Inh. of the Town of Lamoine

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 12, 2013

In other words, 36 M.R.S.A. § 844(2) expressly precludes the State Board from exercising jurisdiction over appeals relating to residential properties. See Wingate v. Town of York, Nos. 2003-005 & 2003-006 (B.P.T.R. … The State Board does not have jurisdiction over this matter because it pertains to a denial of an abatement related to a residential property. Turner v. Maine Revenue Servs., Nos. 2006-010 & 2006-011, at 2 (B.P.T.R.

Kevin Dube v. Lisa Dube

131 A.3d 381 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 19, 2016

See Young v. … Brown v. Habrle, 2008 ME 17, ¶ 10, 940 A.2d 1091 (quotation marks omitted).

Robinson v. Guy Gannett Publishing Company

297 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 17, 1969

Judkins v. Buckland, 149 Me. 59, 65 , 98 A.2d 538 (1953); Hanna v. Singer, 97 Me. 128 , 53 A. 991 (1908); Bearce v. Bass, 88 Me. 521, 544 , 34 A. 411 (1896). … Compare Judkins v. Buckland, supra, with Brown v. Journal Newspaper Co., 219 Mass. 486 , 107 N.E. 358 (1914).

Coffin v. Rich

45 Me. 507 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1858

Providence Bank v. Billings, 4 Peters, 514 ; Commonwealth v. Eastern Bank, 10 Barr. 442 ; and they are subject, generally, to remedial legislation, like individuals. Brown v. Pen. Bank, 8 Mass. 445 . … Andover v. Flint, 3 Met. 539 . “Such liability,” says C. J. Shaw, in the case of Gray v.

Perkins v. Pendleton

90 Me. 166 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 9, 1897

In Lumley v. … Walker v. Cronin, 107 Mass. 555 ; Bixby v. Dunlap, 56 N. H. 456 ( 22 Am. Rep. 475 ) ; Noice v. Brown, 39 N. J. Law, 569 ; Haskins v. Royster, 70 N. C. 601 , (16 Am. R. 780); Daniel v. Sweareng en, 6 S. C. 297 (24 Am.

State v. Soule

794 A.2d 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 2, 2002

State v. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. at 169, 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977), see also Waller v.

Priest v. Soule

70 Me. 414 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1879

In Browne v. Stimpson, 2 Mass. 441 , which was on a writ of error, Parsons, C. … Loring v. O'Donnell, 12 Maine, 29. “Such complaint,” observes Dewey, J., in Rice v.

Androscoggin County Savings Bank v. Campbell

282 A.2d 858 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 27, 1971

Again in Savings Institution v. … The Supreme Court of the United States in Bank of Redemption v.

Monro v. City of Portland

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 19, 2014

In Mutton Hill Estates Inc. v. … Plaintiffs also allege that "subsequent to the Pl-anning Board's approval," planning board staff met ex parte with the developer on the subject of stormwater drainage. Complaint en 49.

Ex parte Riley

17 F.2d 646 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 28, 1926

S. v. Hughes (D. C.) 278 F. 262 , and cases cited. … It was held by Judge Hale, in this district, in Guimond v. Howes (D.

Keates v. Town of Freeport

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 5, 2021

The Town cites the Law Court's approval of language allowing the Board of Environmental to consider the impact of a project on nearby scenic and aesthetic uses in Uliano v. … Board ofEnvironmental Protection, 2009 ME 89, 129.