Case law

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Luxaire, Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Luxaire, Inc., United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

393 F.2d 661 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1968

393 F.2d 661 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Luxaire, Inc., Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … But, as the company concedes, the task of judging credibility and interpreting evidence is for the Board. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, etc. v. N. L. R.

Williams v. Dodaro

576 F. Supp. 2d 72 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2008

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Mitchell v. Baldrige, 759 F.2d 80, 86 (D.C.Cir.1985) (quoting McKenna v. Weinberger, 729 F.2d 783, 790 (D.C.Cir.1984)); Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 . Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry.

Mortgage Bankers Association v. Seth Harris

720 F.3d 966 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 2013

Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge: The tandem of Paralyzed Veterans of America v. D.C. Arena L.P., 117 F.3d 579 (D.C. Cir. 1997) and Alaska Professional Hunters Ass’n v. … Warshauer v. Solis, 577 F.3d 1330, 1338 (11th Cir. 2009); see also United States v.

Alston v. Town of Brookline

308 F. Supp. 3d 509 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2018

Comm'rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 404, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (emphasis in original) (internal citation omitted); Burrell v. … Board of County Com'rs of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 406, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Southland Industries, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

99 F.2d 117 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1938

Voorhees v. Noye Manufacturing Co., 1894, 151 U. S. 135 , 14 S.Ct. 295 , 38 L.Ed. 101 ; Vincent v. Vincent, 1884, 3 Mackey 320 , 14 D.C. 320 ; Brown v. Evans, 18 F. 56 , C.C.D.Nev., 1883.” … Co., 170 U.S. 675, 679 , 18 S.Ct. 786 , 42 L.Ed. 1192 ; Memphis v. Brown, 94 U.S. 715 , 24 L.Ed. 244 ; Brockett v. Brockett, 2 How. 238 , 11 L.Ed. 251 ; Payne v. Garth, 8 Cir., 285 F. 301 ; Klein v.

McManus v. Williams

519 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2007

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 765 , 118 S.Ct. 2257 , 141 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998). A plaintiff must also demonstrate that she has suffered an objectively tangible harm. Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 .

Automobile Salesmen's Union Local 1095, United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

711 F.2d 383 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1983

The Board’s construction of the Act must be enforced if it is reasonably defensible, even if the court might prefer a different interpretation. NLRB v. … Only if the Board’s construction has no “reasonable basis in law,” Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers v.

Coalition for the Preservation of Hispanic Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission

931 F.2d 73 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 23, 1991

At about the time the Review Board acted, petitioners Hispanic Broadcasting Systems, Inc. … See, e.g., Dettmann v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 802 F.2d 1472 , 1476-77 & n. 8 (D.C.Cir.1986); Power Plant Division, Brown & Root, Inc. v. OSHRC, 673 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1982); Brown v.

Chicago Board of Trade v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Western Union Telegraph Company, Intervenor

223 F.2d 348 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1955

Central Yellow Pine Asso. v. Illinois C. R. Co., 10 I.C.C. 505 , 539-540. 3 . Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Interstate Com. Comm., 1907, 206 U.S. 441 , 27 S.Ct. 700 , 51 L.Ed. 1128 . 4 . Bridgeman-Russell Co. v. G. L. T. … Co. v. United States, Com.Ct.1913, 204 F. 986 . 7 . A ticker service operated by Western Union itself. 8 . Capital Transit Co. v.

C.J. Krehbiel Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Graphic Communications International Union, Local 508 O-K-I, Intervenor

844 F.2d 880 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 1988

v. … Thus the case deserved especially careful scrutiny by the Board. NLRB v.

Ivy v. Army Times Publishing Co.

428 A.2d 831 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1981

Motorola, Inc., 74 Ill.2d 172 , 23 Ill.Dec. 559 , 384 N.E.2d 353 (1979); Harless v. First National Bank, 246 S.E.2d 270 (W.Va.1978); Brown v. Transcom Lines, 284 Or. 597 , 588 P.2d 1087 (1978); Trombelta v. … Comment, Kelsay v.

National Treasury Employees Union v. United States Merit Systems Protection Board and United States Office of Personnel Management

743 F.2d 895 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 11, 1984

United States v. Johnson, 696 F.2d 115, 120 (D.C.Cir.1982); cf. American Postal Workers Union v. … Gage v.

Hayde v. Boynton

26 F.2d 978 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1928

Brown (employees under Boynton in the Shipping Board), Croll, Boynton, and Larson. Subsequently Hayde was made a party. All of these parties, but Hayde and Boynton, have been eliminated. … The Assistant Commissioner affirmed the Board.

Friend v. Britton

220 F.2d 820 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 1955

Our task is to ascertain whether the Deputy Commissioner’s findings are supported by substantial evidence upon the record considered as a whole, O’Leary v. Brown-Pacifie-Maxon, 340 U. … For subsequent history see National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Camera Corp., 2 Cir., 190 F.2d 429 . .

United States v. District of Columbia

654 F.2d 802 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 1981

Brown v. Neeb, 25 Fair Empl. … In Brown v.

Elastic Stop Nut Division Of Harvard Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

921 F.2d 1275 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1990

NLRB v. Bausch and Lomb, Inc., 526 F.2d 817, 821 (2d Cir.1975). The question for the Board to consider is "whether the employer's actions are motivated by anti-union considerations." Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. … United States v. L.A.

Franklin-Mason v. Dalton

District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2009

Cir. 2005) and Brown v. United States, 389 F.3d 1296, 1297 (D.C. Cir. 2004)). Franklin-Mason, 2006 WL 825418 at *1-2. … Department of the Army, Board for Correction of Military Records, 56 F.3d 279, 284 (D.C. Cir. 1995)).

Amobi v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections

882 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 9, 2012

COLUMBIA STEPHEN IFEANYI AMOBI * NGOZI AMOBI * * * v … See, e.g., Howard Univ. v. Best, 484 A.2d 958, 985 (D.C. 1984). Here, there is no evidence that any of the defendants engaged in extreme or outrageous conduct or that Amobi suffered severe emotional distress.

Berrigan v. Sigler

499 F.2d 514 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 1974

Zemel v. … See also United States v.

Local 28, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Inc., Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Associated Maritime Worrers, Local No. 3, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Inc., Afl-Cio, Ingram Barge Company v. National Labor Relations Board

321 F.2d 376 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1963

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ASSOCIATED MARITIME WORRERS, LOCAL NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, INC., AFL-CIO, Respondent. INGRAM BARGE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, 322 U.S. 111, at 130 , 64 S.Ct. 851, at 860 , 88 L.Ed. 1170 (1944).