Case law

State v. Brown

762 S.W.2d 135 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1988

See Sykes v. State, 112 Tenn. 572, 576 , 82 S.W. 185 (1903). In Jamison v. … In Burlison v.

Brown v. Shores

77 S.W.3d 884 · Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Apr 25, 2002

KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Hous. Fin. Corp., 988 S.W.2d 746, 748 (Tex.1999); Zale Corp. v. Rosenbaum, 520 S.W.2d 889, 891 (Tex.1975) (per curiam). Brown’s cause of action accrued February 12, 1998. … In Home v.

Brown v. White

3 A.D.3d 743 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 22, 2004

While interference with visitation can, under certain circumstances, be sufficient to warrant a change in custody (see Ahmad v Naviwala, 306 AD2d 588, 591 [2003], lv dismissed 100 NY2d 615 [2003]; Brodsky v Brodsky, 267 AD2d … 897, 898-899 [1999]), the paramount concern remains the best interest of the child (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171 [1982]; Barney v Barney, 301 AD2d 950, 951 [2003]; Matter of Grenier v Allen, 296 AD2d 619, 620

Duffy v. Brown

708 P.2d 433 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1985

Brown did not hold up to his agreement.” … Kinniburgh v.

Nelson v. Brown

140 Mo. 580 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1897

Y. 353 ; George v. Andrews, 60 Md. 26 ; Calvo v. Davis, 73 N. Y. 211 ; Fish v. Hayward, 28 Hun. (N. Y.) 456; Murray v. Marshall, 94 N. Y. 611 ; Union Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hanford, 143 U. S. 187 ; Metz v. … Todd, 36 Mich. 473 ; Remsen v. Beekman, 25 N. Y. 552 ; Hurd v. Callahan, 9 Abb. N. C. (N. Y.) 374; Jester v. Sterling, 25 Hun. 344 ; Paine v. Jones, 14 Hun. 577 ; King v. Baldwin, 2 Johns. Ch. 559 .

Brown v. Rickets

4 Johns. Ch. 303 · New York Court of Chancery · Jan 27, 1820

I have had occasion frequently to lay down this rule; (Dunscomb v. Dunscomb, Manning v. Manning, and Schiefflin v. Stewart, 1 Johns. Ch. … In Newton v.

Slover v. Brown

140 Ill. App. 3d 618 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 30, 1986

Two counts of the complaint were directed to Robert Brown, as an individual, and two counts were directed against R. S. Brown Trucking. … In Midgett v.

Brown v. Brown

4 Rob. 688 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 30, 1866

(Van Dyne v. Thayre, 19 Wend. 162 . *701 Cooper v. Whitney, 3 Hill, 95 . Balter v. Chase, 6 id. 482. Runyan v. Stewart, 12 Barb. 537 .) … Bank of Utica v. City of Utica, 4 Paige, 399 . Ludlow v. Simond, 2 Caine’s Cas. 1. Truscott v. King, 6 N. Y. Rep. 147 .)

Brown v. Ridgway

10 Pa. 42 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1848

The true reason why error does not lie in foreign attachment, was given by Chief Justice Tilghman, in Lewis v. Wallick. … When, however, an attachment is dissolved because it issued irregularly, as where the property was not a subject of foreign attachment, the proceeding is at an end for every purpose, as it was in Miller v.

O'Neill v. Brown

61 Tex. 34 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1884

The petition in the case of Brown v. O’Neill is copied into the record. … In the original cause of Brown v. O’Neill the burden, of proof was upon Brown.

People v. Brown

82 A.D.3d 1698 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 25, 2011

People v Wise, 49 AD3d 1198, 1199 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 940 [2008], reconsideration denied 10 NY3d 966 [2008]; People v Caballero, 23 AD3d 1031 , 1032 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 846 [2006]). … Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 798-799 [1985]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).

Brainard v. Brown

91 A.D.2d 287 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 27, 1983

However, a breach of that duty only subjects the attorney to liability for malpractice (see Johnson v Gold, 71 AD2d 1056 ; Calhoun v Gale, 29 AD2d 766, affd 23 NY2d 756 ). … Exclusive Envelope Corp., 84 AD 2d 365 ; see Video Corp. of Amer. v Flatto Assoc., 85 AD2d 448, 451 ).

Brown v. Hathaway

10 Minn. 303 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jan 15, 1865

Brown v. State

237 Md. 492 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 10, 1965

Greene v. State, 233 Md. 274, 196 A. 2d 454 (1964); Stevens v. State, supra. Browns’ trial counsel was vigorous in cross-examination. … In Tiller v.

Brown v. Jones

404 Pa. 513 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1961

In Good v. … Brown crossed between intersections would not of itself declare Mrs. Brown an imprudent person. In Shuman v.

Brown v. Johnson

118 Tex. 143 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1929

Brown, Appellant, v. E. A. … Brown v. Engel, 2 Willson, Civil Cases, par. 103.

Brown v. Fales

139 Mass. 21 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 27, 1885

Smith v. Faulkner, 12 Gray, 251 , 255. Eaton v. Smith, 20 Pick. 150 . Russell v. Lathrop, 117 Mass. 424, 426 . Shore v. Wilson, 9 Cl. & Fin. 355, 540, 542, 543, 565. 1 Chit. Con. (11th Am. ed.) 156. … Mansfield v. Edwards, 136 Mass. 15, 19 . And besides, no contract on the part of the defendant was implied, in addition to her express contract in writing, relating to the same subject matter. 1 Chit.

Brown v. Crews

134 So. 3d 561 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 18, 2014

Brown has now been released from the custody of the Department of Corrections and his conditional release supervision has been terminated.

Portnoy v. Brown

430 Pa. 401 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1968

Brown, does not appear therein. … Brown v. Hahn, 419 Pa. 42 , 213 A. 2d 342 (1965).

Brown v. Wilson

58 Okla. 392 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1916

Paul, etc., Co. v. … For the same reason we refuse, on this point, to follow Central Ohio Natural Gas Co., et al. v. Eckert et al., 70 Ohio St. 127 , 71 N. E. 281 ; Brown et al. v. Fowler et al., 65 Ohio St. 507 , 68 N. E. 76 ; Poe v.