Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersIN

9,074 results

0.99s

  • Wicker v. Indiana Reformatory

    525 N.E.2d 1262 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1988

    Judicial Review It is well established that the orders of administrative agencies may be reviewed to determine whether the agency’s decision comports with applicable law. Dale Bland Trucking, Inc. v. … Clearly then Wicker was given notice of the proposed action and an opportunity to respond. The procedure followed under IND. CODE 4-15-2-35 provided an initial check against the possibility of a mistaken decision.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MDM INVESTMENTS v. City of Carmel

    740 N.E.2d 929 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2000

    We will reverse only if the decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and cireumstances before the court. Id. I. … The legislature could have qualified this statement by requiring that the complaint serve as notice for only the appropriation proceedings and not the valuation proceedings; the legislature did not.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Aaron v. REVIEW BD. OF INDIANA, ETC.

    416 N.E.2d 125 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 1981

    Once employees are disqualified for unemployment benefits, they have the burden of proving that they have become qualified. … Union members, in order to qualify for benefits, had to report daily to a union officer and to accept tours of duty on the picket line.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stephen W. Peele v. State of Indiana

    Indiana Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 2020

    order the department to remove all information regarding the person from the public portal of the sex and violent offender registry Internet web site established … [10] The plain language of Indiana Code Section 11-8-8-22(d) clearly confers subject matter jurisdiction upon the circuit or superior court in the county in which the Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vantine v. Elkhart Brass Manufacturing Co.

    572 F. Supp. 636 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Sep 30, 1983

    The question of the medical necessity for such surgery was clearly an issue before the Industrial Board of Indiana. … Wausau terminated Vantine’s disability benefits for the first time when a qualified physician, Dr. Heller, advised that Mr. Vantine could return to work.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Smith

    812 F. Supp. 141 · District Court, S.D. Indiana · Dec 15, 1992

    State Farm is incorporated in, and has its principal place of business in Illinois, and is qualified to do business in Indiana and Kentucky. The policy was negotiated and issued in Indiana. … Coverage Under The Policy: The Smith policy is not ambiguous, and does clearly exclude liability coverage under the present facts.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • David E. Matney v. State of Indiana

    Indiana Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 2014

    Greeson was granted immunity in exchange for his testimony against Matney. Greeson, Adams, and other witnesses testified. … To qualify as fundamental error, an error must be so prejudicial to the rights of the defendant as to make a fair trial impossible. Brown v. State, 799 N.E.2d 1064, 1067 (Ind. 2003).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Wainwright Trust Co. v. Kinder

    69 Ind. App. 88 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1918

    changing his will and naming another executor, so that he would be sure Martha was taken care of; that he thereafter made such change, and named him as such executor, but he moved away before the decedent died and did not qualify … Such cases emphasize the idea that there can be no implied contract unless the evidence clearly shows an intention on the part of the one for whom the services were rendered to pay for the same, and. the claimant rendered

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Weidner and Company, P.C. v. Jurgonski & Fredlake CPAs, P.C., Greg Jurgonski, and John Fredlake (mem. dec.)

    Indiana Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2018

    shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Oct 31 2018, 8:44 am court except for the purpose of establishing … The trial court’s declaratory judgment in favor of Jurgonski and Fredlake on the for cause issue is not clearly erroneous.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tippecanoe County Assessor v. D and J Black Second Limited Partnership

    Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025

    Nonetheless, the Court also noted that a non-attorney’s expertise in the assessment process does not make them qualified in the practice of law, specifically referencing constitutional claims as a type of issue that qualifies … Some of Grossman’s claims appear to be constitutional in nature and clearly constitute the practice of law.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Tippecanoe County Assessor v. Lawrence L Mock

    Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025

    Nonetheless, the Court also noted that a non-attorney’s expertise in the assessment process does not make them qualified in the practice of law, specifically referencing constitutional claims as a type of issue that qualifies … Some of Grossman’s claims appear to be constitutional in nature and clearly constitute the practice of law.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State ex rel. Interstate Public Service Co. v. Lund

    80 Ind. App. 349 · Indiana Court of Appeals · May 29, 1923

    The undisputed evidence establishes the following facts pertinent to the questions submitted for our determination. … The undisputed evidence shows that the indebtedness on which this action is based, was incurred by the contractor in the prosecution of the work in question, and therefore clearly falte within the provisions of the bond,

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Crowley v. Crowley

    708 N.E.2d 42 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1999

    The citation for contempt filed by Laura on March 10, 1997, clearly established the bases for her request— Mark’s failure to pay child support and mortgage payments on the marital residence. … Payments of credit card debts qualify as such an in-kind payment.

    Overruled on other grounds by Marriage of Bojrab v. Bojrab, 2004 Ind. LEXIS 575 (2004)Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Town of Clear Lake v. Hoagland Family Ltd. Partnership

    75 N.E.3d 1081 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 2017

    establish “reasonable penalties for failure to make a connection . . . .” … Because the issue is not before us, we cannot rule on what penalty would qualify as “reasonable,” but we have little difficulty saying that a penalty of $2.9 million is nowhere near it.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Tippecanoe County Assessor v. D and J Black Second Limited Partnership

    Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025

    Nonetheless, the Court also noted that a non-attorney’s expertise in the assessment process does not make them qualified in the practice of law, specifically referencing constitutional claims as a type of issue that qualifies … Some of Grossman’s claims appear to be constitutional in nature and clearly constitute the practice of law.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Tippecanoe County Assessor v. Terry S & Jane C Stewart TTEES

    Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025

    Nonetheless, the Court also noted that a non-attorney’s expertise in the assessment process does not make them qualified in the practice of law, specifically referencing constitutional claims as a type of issue that qualifies … Some of Grossman’s claims appear to be constitutional in nature and clearly constitute the practice of law.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Tippecanoe County Assessor v. Olav Lund-Mikkelsen

    Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025

    Nonetheless, the Court also noted that a non-attorney’s expertise in the assessment process does not make them qualified in the practice of law, specifically referencing constitutional claims as a type of issue that qualifies … Some of Grossman’s claims appear to be constitutional in nature and clearly constitute the practice of law.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • LBL Development, LLC v. St. John Plan Commission, Town of St. John, Indiana

    Indiana Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2023

    “The first step in interpreting a statute is to determine whether the [legislative body] has spoken clearly and unambiguously on the point in question.” City of Carmel v. … [38] Therefore, the plain language of the two ordinances establishes that the Council designated R-1 zoning for the Property.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kleinschmidt v. Clark

    143 Ind. App. 99 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1968

    That Plaintiff is the duly appointed, qualified, and acting special administratrix of the Estate of Millard T. … This appears to us .to be clearly speculative and conjectural and does not constitute any direct evidence of speeding or any evidence from which an inference of speeding could be drawn. ...

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tippecanoe County Assessor v. D and J Black Second Limited Partnership

    Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025

    Nonetheless, the Court also noted that a non-attorney’s expertise in the assessment process does not make them qualified in the practice of law, specifically referencing constitutional claims as a type of issue that qualifies … Some of Grossman’s claims appear to be constitutional in nature and clearly constitute the practice of law.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.