Case law

Kuhn v. SAIF Corp.

73 Or. App. 768 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1985

SAIF petitioned for Board review. Relying on our opinion in Giesbrecht v. SAIF, 58 Or App 218 , 648 P2d 70 (1982), the Board first determined that it was improper for the referee to find Dr. … Garbutt v. SAIF, 297 Or 148, 151 , 681 P2d 1149 (1984); Hoke v. Libby, McNeil & Libby, 73 Or App 44, 46 , 697 P2d 993 (1985). Dr.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Knapp

100 Or. App. 615 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 7, 1990

The Board affirmed. Employer did not pay benefits for temporary total disability, apparently reasoning, in reliance on Cutwright v. … In the first review, we affirmed the Board’s order of June 17, 1986, without opinion. Weyerhaeuser Company v. Knapp, 85 Or App 220 , 736 P2d 230 (1987).

State v. Jones

109 Or. App. 235 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 16, 1991

In State v. … The reference to the parole board is overbroad. The sentence should have solely referred to the discretion of the court. Accordingly, we overrule the portion of Noble that pertains to the parole board.

Pilgrim v. Delta Airlines, Inc.

234 Or. App. 80 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 3, 2010

The board explained that, under the Supreme Court’s decision in Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. … SAIF v. Henwood, 176 Or App 431, 435 , 31 P3d 1096 (2001), rev den, 333 Or 463 (2002).

Miller v. Union County

48 Or. 266 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1906

Pep. 758); McCall v. Marion County, 43 Or. 536 ( 73 Pac. 1031 , 75 Pac. 140 ). In Hammer v. … Since the opinion in Hammer v.

State v. Milbradt

305 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1988

Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). … In State v. Middleton, this court allowed in testimony concerning normal reactions to abuse but did so before we decided State u. Brown.

Stone v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

294 Or. 442 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1983

SAIF raised no challenge to the compensation award on appeal to the Board. … Co. v. Watkins, 264 Or 464 , 506 P2d 179 (1973). The concession was really an admission that claimant was entitled to interim compensation. Cf. Johnson v. Paulson, 83 Or 238 , 154 P 685 , 163 P 435 (1917).

Apalategui v. Washington County

80 Or. App. 508 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 6, 1986

In Jefferson Landfill Comm. v. … Compare Wagner v. Marion County, 79 Or App 233 , 719 P2d 31 (1986).

Teel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

58 Or. App. 564 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 18, 1982

Employer properly concedes that the Board was required to award a reasonable attorney fee, because claimant prevailed on the employer-initiated appeal to the Board on the issue of compensability. … Claimant is entitled to the award of a reasonable attorney fee for his attorney’s representation on the compensation issue, but not on the penalty issue on which the employer prevailed before the Board. See Korter v.

Medford Irr. Dist. v. Hill

96 Or. 649 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1920

Co. v. … v.

Roseburg Lumber Co. v. State Tax Commission

223 Or. 294 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1960

See State ex rel Galloway v. Watson, 167 Or 403, 118 P2d 107 . … New York v. United States, 342 US 882, 884 , 72 S Ct 152 , 153, 96 LEd 662 .

State v. Volynets-Vasylchenko

246 Or. App. 632 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 2011

In State v. … Brown, 241 Or App 226, 232 , 250 P3d 386 (2011); and that the error did not usurp the jury’s factfinding function because the same jury acquitted the defendant on other charges, State v.

Tyler v. State

28 Or. 238 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1895

In Becker v. Malheur County, 24 Or. 217 , ( 33 Pac. 543 ,) the plaintiff sought to review an order of the board of equalization in the matter of correcting his assessment. … C. 6 Or. 300 ; Barton v. La Grande, 17 Or. 577, 22 Pac. 111 ; Smith v.

Devin Oil Co., Inc. v. Morrow County

236 Or. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 30, 2010

Wetherell v. Douglas County, 209 Or App 1, 4 , 146 P3d 343 (2006). … Younger v. City of Portland, 305 Or 346, 359 , 752 P2d 262 (1988).

Sedgwick CMS, Inc. v. Dover

318 Or. App. 38 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 2022

In reliance on SAIF v. … We cited our opinion in Schlecht v.

Irvington Transfer v. Jasenosky

116 Or. App. 635 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 2, 1992

In Kessen v. … Employer takes issue with the Board’s conclusion that claimant was not an active participant in the fight. Employer argues that we held in Kessen v. Boise Cascade Corp., supra, and SAIF v.

Sisters of Providence v. McGuire

183 Or. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 2002

Marvin Wood Products v. … Therefore, the board did not err in affirming the ARU and ALJ. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988).

Bonnett v. State ex rel. Division of State Lands

151 Or. App. 143 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 5, 1997

Louis v. … Shively v. Bowlby, 152 US 1 , 14 S Ct 548 , 38 L Ed 331 (1894). Tidelands “are lands usually or ordinarily covered and uncovered every 24 hours by the action of the tides.” State Land Board v.

Edwards v. Union High School District No. 8

198 Or. 611 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1953

Also see Webb v. Clatsop Co. School Dist. 3, 188 Or 324, 334 , 215 P2d 368 ; Witham v. McNutt et al., 186 Or 668 , 208 P2d 459 ; Re Application of Riggs et al., 105 Or 531, 552 , 207 P 175, 1005 , 210 P 217 ; Roesch v. … The question of the selection of a school site was duly submitted by the school board to an election held throughout the union high school district, and site No. 2 in Albany was approved by a majority vote. McBee v.

SAIF v. Houk

316 Or. App. 568 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 2021

For the reasons recently discussed in Bruntz-Ferguson v. Liberty Mutual Ins., 310 Or App 618, 485 P3d 903 (2021), SAIF v. Lynn, 315 Or App 720, 502 P3d 1172 (2021), and Miles v. … SAIF v.