Case law

Pacific Live Stock Co. v. Lewis

217 F. 95 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 28, 1914

Dietzsch v. Huidekoper, 103 U. S. 494 , 26 L. Ed. 497 ; French v. Hay, 22 Wall. 250 , 22 L. Ed. 857 ; Wagner v. Drake (D. C.) 31 Fed. 849 ; Abeel v. Culberson (C. C.) 56 Fed. 329 . … Rep. 647 , McCook Ingales Co. v. Cross, 70 Neb. 115 , 102 N. W. 249 , and Ormsby v.

Anderson v. West Union Village Square

44 Or. App. 685 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 1980

Anderson v. West Union Village Square, 43 Or App 295 , 602 P2d 1092 (1979). Claimant petitioned for review in the Supreme Court, and under Rule 10.10 the case is automatically before us on reconsideration. … It would be procedurally unfair for the Board or this court to rule on such an issue when a claimant has been lulled into inaction by the employer’s apparent acquiescence. We recognized these principles in Neely v.

Sauer v. Pioneer Adjustment Co.

44 Or. App. 715 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 1980

On review, the Board said, relying on language from Larsen v. State Ind. Acc. … Unlike the situation in Otto v.

Claypool v. O'Neill

65 Or. 511 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1913

In Gardner v. … This covers the only question raised by O’Neill’s objections to the findings of the board of control, and necessitates a reversal of the decree of the Circuit Court by which it is adjudged that the decree in O’Neill v.

CCP Crestview 1505 LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Mar 28, 2024

The subject property’s 2021-22 tax roll real market value, sustained by the board of property tax appeals (board), was $10,561,070. (Compl at 3.) Its maximum assessed value and assessed value were each $7,435,440. … Rivers Edge, 359 Or at 827; see also Powell Street I, LLC v.

Welch v. Clatsop County

24 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1893

In National Bank v. Kimball, 103 U. S. 732 , Mr. … R. v. Frary, 22 Ill. 34 . In Mining Co. v. Auditor-General, 37 Mich. 391 , the court says: “ Equity will not interfere to restrain the collection of the public revenue for mere irregularities.

Martin v. Cambas

134 Or. 257 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1930

J. 976, § 271, note 28 (a); Shakel v. Drapeau, 33 L. C. Jur. 55; Brown v. Allen, 67 Ark. 386 ( 55 S. W. 143 ). … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Collins v. Fitzwater

277 Or. 401 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1977

See Black and Co. v. Nova-Tech, Inc., 333 F Supp 468, 471-72 (D Or 1971); Fulton v. White Motor Corp., supra at 210; Ward v. Arnold, 52 Wash 2d 581, 328 P2d 164, 166 (1958); Modica v. … Co. v.

Naito v. Naito

178 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2001

See, e.g., Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, 264 Or 614, 628-29 , 507 P2d 387 (1973); see also Cooke v. Fresh Express Foods Corp., 169 Or App 101, 108-09 , 7 P3d 717 (2000); Chiles v. … See Naito v.

Taylor v. SAIF

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 2023

See Dotson v. … See OEA v.

Big Moose Development Inc. v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Jan 11, 2013

Defendant was represented by Jeff Sanders (Sanders), Oregon Registered Appraiser III, and Jeff Brown (Brown), Residential Appeals Lead Appraiser, Multnomah County Assessor‟s office. … Plaintiff appealed the assessor‟s values to the Multnomah County Board of Property Tax Appeals (Board) and the Board sustained the values.

Ohlig v. FMC Marine & Rail Equipment Division

291 Or. 586 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1981

In adopting this line of reasoning, the Court of Appeals relied on three of its own cases, Vandehey v. Pumilite Glass & Building Co., 35 Or App 187 , 580 P2d 1068 (1978); Smith v. … Amalgamated Sugar Co., 25 Or App 243 , 548 P2d 1329 (1976); and Grudle v. S.A.I.F., 4 Or App 326 , 479 P2d 250 (1971). The court noted our decision in Cavins v.

Eagle Creek Rock Products, Inc. v. Clackamas County

27 Or. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 1976

See Clackamas Co. v. Holmes, 265 Or 193 , 508 P2d 190 (1973). … See Bergford v. Clack. Co./Trans. Serv., 15 Or App 362 , 515 P2d 1345 (1973).

McLean v. Pine Eagle School District, No. 61

194 F. Supp. 3d 1102 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 1, 2016

Plaintiff argues that the Safety Committee’s decisions were not constrained by any school board policy or subject to review by the board. Plaintiff adds that this case is similar to the facts in Hyland v. … Pine Eagle’s other school board members also did not learn about the drill until after it happened. . In Flores v.

Cameron Logging v. Jones

109 Or. App. 391 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1991

Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 205 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). Although the order contains explicit findings of fact, it does not explain why they lead to the Board’s conclusions. … Misallocation of the burden of proof is a procedural error, Harris v.

Gunsolley v. Bushby

19 Or. App. 884 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 1974

The relevant authorities are: Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US 564 , 92 S Ct 2701 , 33 L Ed 2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 US 593 , 92 S Ct 2694 , 92 S Ct 2717 , 33 L Ed 2d 570 (1972); Papadopoulos v. … of Regents v.

Compton v. SAIF Corp.

195 Or. App. 329 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 2004

See Cope v. West American Ins. … We review the board’s conclusion as a matter of law, Henderson v. S.D. Deacon Corp., 127 Or App 333, 337 , 874 P2d 76 (1994), and agree that claimant’s injury did not occur in the course of employment.

O'Brien v. Employment Division

35 Or. App. 773 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 1978

The applicable rule was stated in Stevenson v. … The Board’s findings of fact are supported by the requisite amount of evidence and its conclusion based on those findings is correct as a matter of law. See, Baker v.

Bowser v. Evans Products Co.

17 Or. App. 542 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 11, 1974

Carter’s *546 opinion so we cannot entertain the claim for aggravation under ORS 656.271 (1971). ② McKinney v. G. L. Pine, Inc., 16 Or App 619 , 519 P2d 1265 (1974); Collins v. … The order was affirmed by the Board on May 2, 1969, and remains the law of the case.

Mesa v. Barker Manufacturing Co.

66 Or. App. 161 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 1983

We held in Forney v. … Employer argues that Woodman v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 289 Or 551 , 614 P2d 1162 (1980), is controlling in the case.