Case law

Opinion No. 70-228 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 1970

In the case of State v. Sowards, 64 Okl. Cr. 430 , 82 P.2d 324 , the court, in paragraphs two and three of its syllabus, held: "2. … To the same effect see Farley v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 and Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co., 178 Okl. 212 , 62 P.2d 94 .

Delaware County Ex Rel. Carver v. Hogan

33 Okla. 791 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1912

That the same exists is in effect decided in the cases of Wenner v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 25 Okla. 515, 106 Pac. 821 , and Thompson et al. v. State ex rel. Cooksey et al., 25 Okla. 741 , 108 Pac. 398 . … Lee v.

State Ex Rel. West v. Frame

38 Okla. 446 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1913

De Lima v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 197 , 21 Sup. Ct. 753, 45 L. Ed. 1041 . The foregoing general rule has no application to the class of laws now under consideration. … Arie v. State, 1 Okla. Or. 666, 100 Pac. 23 ; State v. Chaney et al., 23 Okla. 788 , 102 Pac. 133 ; Frick v. Oats, 20 Okla. 473 , 94 Pac. 682 .

McCurley v. City of El Reno

138 Okla. 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1929

In Miller et al. v. Board of Public Works *95 of City of Los Angeles et al. … A discussion of these matters may be found, however, in the following cases: Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 71 L. Ed. 303 ; Streich v. Board of Education, 34 S. D. 169, 147 N. W. 779 , L. R. A. 1915A, 632, Ann.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Pourron

118 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1926

The section in question provides that the township (board shall select from its township road system the ro-aids to be dragged. Them follows the provisidn above quoted. … For support of his position che cases of Lusk v. Starkey, 53 Okla. 794, 158 , Pac. 918, and St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v.

Schrom Ex Rel. Schrom v. Oklahoma Industrial Development

536 P.2d 904 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1975

In State v. … In Henry v.

Town of Red Fork v. Gantt-Baker Co.

130 Okla. 175 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1928

Miller, Pres Board of “Trustees. Attest: W. S. “Fasholtz.” . … Rubber Co. v. City of Tulsa, 193 Okla. 163 , 229 Pac. 771 . See, also, Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. News Dispatch Co., 104 Okla. 260 , 231 Pac. 250 ; Haskins & Sells v. Okla. City, 36 Okla. 57 , 126 Pac. 204 .

McSpadden v. Mahoney

402 P.2d 656 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1964

In the case of Lacer v. … In the second paragraph of the syllabus to Brown v.

Daniels v. Scott

340 P.2d 223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1959

Parks, 182 Okl. 598 , 78 P.2d 791, 792 , in reversing Board of County Com’rs of Lincoln County v. … Co. v. Haxton Steam Heater Co., 18 Ill.App. 484, 485 , cited in Houston v. Brown, supra, the court said, “The order was not final.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 1994

OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD V. MOSS, 509 P.2D 666, 668 (OKLA.1973). … SEE OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION V. FORTINBERRY CO., 207 P.2D 301 (OKLA. 1949). THIS DOES NOT MEAN, HOWEVER, THAT THE BOARD IS REQUIRED, BY STATUTE OR RULE, TO TAKE POSSESSION OF STUDENT RECORDS WHEN A SCHOOL CLOSES.

Locke v. State

554 P.2d 847 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1976

An additional loan was denied whereupon the defendant left Brown’s place, only to return in a few minutes with a brown bag, identified as State’s Exhibit No. 4, containing three revolvers. … Story v. State, Okl.Cr., 478 P.2d 929 (1970); Woods v. State, Okl.Cr., 440 P.2d 994 (1968); Tilford v. State, Okl.Cr., 437 P.2d 261 (1968).

State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. Frame

200 Okla. 650 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1948

J. 171; Scribner’s Sons v. Marrs (Tex.) 262 S. W. 722 . In Smith v. State Industrial Accident Com. … See, also, Campbell Building Co. v. Road Commission (Utah) 70 P. 2d 857 . In State Board of Barber Examiners v.

Luna v. State

62 Okla. Crim. 435 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1937

In Rogers v. State, 57 Okla. … Kirk v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 281 , 135 Pac. 1156 ; State v. Wilks, 17 Okla. Cr. 247 , 187 Pac. 813 ; Wever v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 414 , 211 Pac. 1062 .” In Hanna v. State, 30 Okla.

Carrico v. Couch

45 Okla. 672 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1915

In Crawford v. Wilson, 4 Barb. (N. … A delay arising from the act of. the court is never allowed to prejudice the party [Spaulding v. Congdon], 18 Wend. 543 ; [Ryghtmyer v. Durham], 12 Wend. 245 ; Springsted v. Jayne, 4 Cow. [N. Y.] 423; [Mackay v.

State Highway Commission v. Green-Boots Const. Co.

199 Okla. 477 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1947

In Etzold v. Board of Commissioners, 141 N. … State Banking Board, 49 Okla. 184 , 152 P. 389 ; Wentz v. Potter, 167 Okla. 154 , 28 P. 2d 562 ; Antrim Lumber Co. v. Sneed, 175 Okla. 47 , 52 P. 2d 1040 ; Hawks v.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System v. City of Spencer

237 P.3d 125 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 2009

American Ins., supra note 13 , at % 6, at 739 (citing Greer County Election Board v. Elliott, 1910 OK 183, 12-3 , 109 P. 731, 732 , 26 OKL. 546; Webb v. … Board. of Examiners in Optometry v. Lawton, 1974 OK 69, ¶8 , 523 P.2d 1064, 1066 . . Shadid v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 1982 OK 3, ¶ 8 , 639 P.2d 1239, 1242 (citing Peters v.

State v. Cox

575 P.2d 121 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1978

State v. Dabney, 77 Okl.Cr. 331 , 141 P.2d 303 (1943). … For example see, State v. Robinson, Okl.Cr., 544 P.2d 545 (1975), Claghorn v. State, Okl.Cr., 505 P.2d 998 (1973), State v. McDonald, 10 Okl.Cr. 413 , 137 P. 362 (1914).

Opinion No. 72-259 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1972

This general statement of the law has been approved by the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma in the case of Caffey v. Veale, 193 Okl. 444 , 145 P.2d 961 . … While discussing the case of Redmond v. Incorporated Town of Sulphur, 32 Okl. 201 , 120 P. 262 ; and the case of Russell v. Murphy, 177 Okl. 255 , 58 P.2d 560 , the Court stated: ". . .

Walker v. Group Health Services, Inc.

37 P.3d 749 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 2001

Co. v. … Here, the Insurance Board has no power to give the relief Walker seeks under the tort rubric. The Insurance Board cannot award damages for bad faith breach of the insurance contract.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 30, 2005

Smith v. … See also Carter Oil Co. v.