Case law

Parrish v. Wright

828 A.2d 778 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 2003

Rogers v. Jackson, 2002 ME 140, ¶ 5 , 804 A.2d 379, 380 . A material fact is one that has “the potential to affect the outcome of the suit.” Bay View Bank v. … Brown, 495 A.2d 324, 327 (Me.1985) (vacating a summary judgment dismissing the claim), we recognized an independent claim on a theory of negligence for damages done by a dog.

Nicholson, M.D. v. State of Maine, Bd. of Licensure in Med.

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 30, 2006

NICHOLSON, M.D., Petitioner v. … the Board.

Austin v. Maine Bureau of Human Resources

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 10, 2015

City of Lewiston v. Nle. … Rather, the Board in this instance actually took action on Petitioner's appeal, and it is that decision which this Court reviews. See Tomer v.1'v1e.

Merrill's Case

126 Me. 215 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 21, 1927

IIuse v. Brown, 8 Maine, 167. “The sickness which is terminated by the death of a patient in his last sickness.”

R.A. Cummings, Inc. v. Town of Topsham

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 1, 2004

CUMMINGS, INC,, d/b/a AUBURN CONCRETE, Plaintiff / Apellant v. ~" ORDER TOWN OF TOPSHAM, JUL 12 2004 Defendant/ Appellee This matter came before the court on appeal from a decision of the Town of Topsham Board of Appeals … (3) | Which board has jurisdiction to consider interpretation of zoning ordinances when an application is pending before the Planning Board? Are there Provisions for consultation between the boards?

In Re Estate of Wilson

2000 Me. 49 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 2000

See Board of Overseers of the Bar v. … See Balian v.

CSG Properties, LLC v. Town of Windham

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 19, 2019

See Annable v. Board efEnvironmental Protection, 507 A.2d 592, 595 (Me. 1986). … In Kittery Retail Ventures, LLC v.

Fillion v. Allain

153 Me. 303 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 16, 1957

From 1946 when the agreement was signed until the plaintiff left the defendant’s home, the plaintiff received $3 or $4 a week in cash, in addition to room and board, laundry, clothing in small amounts, and once at least hospital … Garmong v. Henderson, supra, at p. 90 . See also Page v. Moulton, 127 Me. 80 , 141 A. 183 ; Spang v. Cote, 144 Me. 338 , 68 A. (2nd) 823. The entry will be Motion sustained. Verdict set aside. New trial ordered.

Copp v. Longley

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 12, 2019

The Board's sole responsibility at that time was to determine whether or not a violation had occurred. See Town ofLevant v. … The only record included with petitioners 80B brief was a transcript of the October 8, 2018 hearing where the Board upheld the CEO's NOV. See Ram1s Head Partners. LLC v.

The Friends of Lincoln Lakes v. Town of Lincoln, Bd. of Appeals

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 3, 2010

Procedural Rules, Appeals Board of the Town of Lincoln § (V)(B)(4)-(5). … See Nergaard v.

Reynolds v. City of Waterville

92 Me. 292 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 26, 1898

S. 472 ; Mount Hope Cemetery v. City of Boston, 158 Mass. 509 , ( 35 Am. St. Rep. 515 , note); Richland Co. v. Lawrence Co., 12 Ill. 8 ; Harris v. Board of Supervisors, 105 Ill. 445 ; Mayor of Baltimore v. … Lovejoy v. Foxcroft, 91 Maine, 367. Even cash in 1 the treasury for the purpose of paying bonds cannot be deducted. Waxahatchie v. Brown, 67 Tex. 519 ; 17 Am. & Eng. Corp. Cases, 348.

Crosby v. Cornforth

112 Me. 109 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1914

Andrews v. Schoppe, supra. ■ And we may as well say here, that in Andrews v. … Brown v. Coggswell, 5 All., 556 . And in law, “personal property” includes all property rights and estates, except real estate, and interests therein.

Houlton Sav. Bank v. American Laundry Machinery Co.

9 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 13, 1934

with under-sleeve boards, single arm suspension brackets, table mounting type; with some appurtenances; some machines being described as motor driven. … Co. v. Paramount Laundries, 279 Mass. 314 , 181 N.

Blanchette v. United States

102 F. Supp. 311 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 24, 1952

On October 25, 1943, the Army Retiring Board found the insured was incapacitated for further military duty due to his physical condition and recommended his release from active service. … As was recently said by the District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee in its opinion in the case of Hendricks v.

Kennebec County v. Maine Pub. Employees Retirement Sys.

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 8, 2013

See MSAD 27, 2009 ME 108, ~ 25, 98S A.2d S9 (citing Levy v. … v. Pelletier, 2009 ME 11, ~ 17, 964 A.2d 6SO; City ifAuburn v. Desgrosseilliers, 578 A.2d 712, 714 (Me. 1990).

Rawson v. Porter

9 Me. 119 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1832

Irving v. Wilson & al. 4 T. R. 485. … Gates v. Winslow, 1 Mass. 65 ; Wallis, ex'r. v. Wallis, 4 Mass, 135; Brown v. McKinnally, 1 *123 Esp. 279; Marriot v. Hampton, 2 Esp. 546, la Cartwright v.

Hernandez v. Prizma, Inc.

39 F.2d 196 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 17, 1930

The latter appealed, and the Board of Examiners in Chief held that be was entitled to all the claims. … Morgan v. Daniels, supra. In the case of Gold v.

Robinson v. Guy Gannett Publishing Company

297 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 17, 1969

Judkins v. Buckland, 149 Me. 59, 65 , 98 A.2d 538 (1953); Hanna v. Singer, 97 Me. 128 , 53 A. 991 (1908); Bearce v. Bass, 88 Me. 521, 544 , 34 A. 411 (1896). … Compare Judkins v. Buckland, supra, with Brown v. Journal Newspaper Co., 219 Mass. 486 , 107 N.E. 358 (1914).

Lakin v. Chartered Co.

111 Me. 556 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 5, 1914

In Shaw v. … Brown v. Kimball, 84 Maine, 495; Annis v. Butterfield, 99 Maine, 189; Sneiders v. Smith, 185 Mass., 62 ; Donnell v. Railroad Company, 73 Maine, 567.

Perkins v. Pendleton

90 Me. 166 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 9, 1897

In Lumley v. … Walker v. Cronin, 107 Mass. 555 ; Bixby v. Dunlap, 56 N. H. 456 ( 22 Am. Rep. 475 ) ; Noice v. Brown, 39 N. J. Law, 569 ; Haskins v. Royster, 70 N. C. 601 , (16 Am. R. 780); Daniel v. Sweareng en, 6 S. C. 297 (24 Am.