Case law

Kearns v. Fed. Aviation Admin.

312 F. Supp. 3d 97 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 2018

Board under that case number. … See Brown v. U.S. Dep't of Justice , 2015 WL 1237274 , at *6 (E.D. Cal.

United Food and Commercial Workers International Union Local No. 576, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

675 F.2d 346 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1982

The Board finds a second rationale in the fact that the General Counsel’s dismissal of a charge is not subject to judicial review. NLRB v. … The Ninth Circuit elaborated on the need to preserve the Board’s authority in Frito Co. v.

Heffernan v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2019

Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP v. Internal Revenue Serv., 537 F. Supp. 2d 128, 134 (D.D.C. 2008) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). … Mayer, Brown, 537 F.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local Union No. 310 v. National Labor Relations Board, Shamrock Dairy, Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Shamrock Dairy, Inc.

280 F.2d 665 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1960

But in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. … See Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1944, 321 U.S. 678, 683 , 64 S.Ct. 830 , 88 L.Ed. 1007 ; Lion Oil Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 1957, 245 F.2d 376, 379 .

United States v. The Tropic Wind

28 F. Cas. 218 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Jun 13, 1861

S. v. Palmer. 3 Wheat. [16 U. S.] 463; Foster v. Neilson, 2 Pet. [27 U. S.] 253; Williams v. Suffolk Ins. Co., 13 Pet. [38 U. S.] 415; Luther v. Borden, 7 How. [48 U. S.] 1; and the case of Dorris’ Rebellion. … Brown, commander) on the 21st day of May, 1861.

Bryant v. United States

599 A.2d 1107 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1991

The Court therefore found it unnecessary to engage in “attenuation analysis” under Brown v. … E.g., Cauthen v. United States, 592 A.2d 1021 , 1023 & nn. 2-3 (D.C.1991); Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1017-18 (D.C.1991). Numerous males in various parts of the city might have matched that description, cf.

Hornsby v. Thompson

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 2023

As support, Plaintiff might have cited Trammel v. Brown, No. 94-cv-149, 1995 WL 708666 (N.D. Ill. … of Rudder v. Vilsack, 10 F. Supp. 3d 190, 196 (D.D.C. 2014) (citations omitted); see also Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 15 (D.C.

Gladys M. Tillotson v. United States

231 F.2d 736 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 1956

The Court in McNabb v. … United States, 1952, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 197 , 202 F.2d 329 , certiorari denied 1952, 344 U.S. 869 , 73 S.Ct. 112 , 97 L.Ed. 674 , cited “cf.” in Brown v. Allen, 1953, 344 U.S. 443, 476 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 . .

Alston v. Town of Brookline

308 F. Supp. 3d 509 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2018

Comm'rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 404, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (emphasis in original) (internal citation omitted); Burrell v. … Board of County Com'rs of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 406, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Stanberger v. Mason

124 F.2d 401 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 22, 1941

She relies upon Proctor v. … Miguel v. McCarl, 1934, 291 U.S. 442 , 54 S.Ct. 465 , 78 L.Ed. 901 .

Locks v. United States

388 A.2d 873 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1978

See, e. g., Ackerson v. … In Fowler v. United States, supra, and Skantze v.

United States v. Jones

84 F. Supp. 2d 124 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 1999

United States v. Lafayette, 983 F.2d 1102, 1105 (D.C.Cir.1993), citing Thompson v. United States, 188 F.2d 652, 653 (D.C.Cir.1951). … United States v. Mangieri, 694 F.2d 1270, 1286 (D.C.Cir.1982), citing Larrison v. United States, 24 F.2d 82 (7th Cir.1928) (the “Larrison standard”).

Ransom v. Dorko

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2025

The Board’s initial decision became final on September 3, 2020, and Plaintiff was notified of her options for appeal, which included filing a petition for MSPB Board review, a petition with the U.S. … Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976). By the same token, the Supreme Court recognizes the CSRA as a “comprehensive system for reviewing personnel action taken against federal employees.” United States v.

United States v. Volvo Powertrain Corporation

758 F.3d 330 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 2014

The settlement agreement with the California Air Resources Board was not incorporated into a consent decree. See Smyth ex rel. Smyth v. … Whitman v. Am.

American Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union and Local Union No. 245, Abc, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Guy's Foods, Inc., Intervenor. Guy's Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

379 F.2d 160 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1967

379 F.2d 160 AMERICAN BAKERY & CONFECTIONERY WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION AND LOCAL UNION NO. 245, ABC, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Guy's Foods, Inc., Intervenor. … GUY'S FOODS, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 20189. No. 20347. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued February 27, 1967. Decided May 18, 1967. Mr.

National Federation of Federal Employees v. United States

695 F. Supp. 1196 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 1988

Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 569 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1735 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … (quoting Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. 348, 354 , 100 S.Ct. 594, 599 , 62 L.Ed.2d 540 (1980) and citing Snepp, 444 U.S. at 509 n. 3, 100 S.Ct. at 765 n. 3).

Robbins v. Footer

553 F.2d 123 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1977

Brown v. Keaveny, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 326 F.2d 660, 661 (1963); cf. Canterbury v. … Reitman, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 352 , 389 F.2d 303, 304 (1967); Brown v. Keaveny, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 326 F.2d 660, 661 (1963) 3 See W.

Roy v. United States

527 A.2d 742 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1987

Brown. … See Brown v. Texas, 443 *744 U.S. 47, 52 , 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2641 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); compare United States v.

Ivy v. Army Times Publishing Co.

428 A.2d 831 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1981

Motorola, Inc., 74 Ill.2d 172 , 23 Ill.Dec. 559 , 384 N.E.2d 353 (1979); Harless v. First National Bank, 246 S.E.2d 270 (W.Va.1978); Brown v. Transcom Lines, 284 Or. 597 , 588 P.2d 1087 (1978); Trombelta v. … Comment, Kelsay v.

United States v. Walter J. Barlow, Jr.

470 F.2d 1245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 17, 1972

Dye v. State, 77 Ga.App. 517 , 48 S.E.2d 742 (1948); Green v. State, 114 Ga. 918 , 41 S.E. 55 (1902); Dunlavey v. Commonwealth, 184 Va. 521 , 35 S.E.2d 763 (1945); Laminack v. … State, 54 Ga.App. 207 , 187 S.E. 620 (1936); Good v. State, 21 Okl.Cr. 328 , 207 P. 565 , 29 A.L.K. 1029 (1922); Brown v. State, 7 Okl.Cr. 678 , 126 P. 263, 265 (1912). 12 . 18 U.S.C. § 3 provides: § 3.