Case law

Opinion No. 70-228 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 1970

In the case of State v. Sowards, 64 Okl. Cr. 430 , 82 P.2d 324 , the court, in paragraphs two and three of its syllabus, held: "2. … To the same effect see Farley v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 and Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co., 178 Okl. 212 , 62 P.2d 94 .

Kurtz v. Clark

290 P.3d 779 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 2012

Kaplan v. … good faith," and "when a board refuses a demand, the only issues to be examined are the good faith and reasonableness of its investigation." - Spiegel v.

Alberty v. Parks

128 Okla. 178 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1927

Co. v. City of Bartlesville, 27 Okla. 214 , 111 Pac. 207 ; Spradling v. Hudson, 45 Okla. 767 , 146 Pac. 588 . … Judge, 90 Okla. 170 , 221 Pac. 9 ; Kincannon v. Pugh, 114 Okla. 90 , 243 Pac. 945 .

Garrett v. Oklahoma Panhandle State University

156 P.3d 48 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 2006

. 2 Among other cases, the Board of Regents cited Oklahoma Ordnance Works Authority v. … Corporation v.

State v. R. C. Jones & Co.

169 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1934

That section makes it the duty of the board of equalization to check the sworn report or statement of the corporation with specific authority in such board to examine the books, records, and files of such corporation, and … Wolverton Hardware Co. v. Porter, 61 Okla. 171 , 160 P. 906 . See, also, the analogous reasoning of the court in Payne County v.

Hembree v. City of Stilwell

597 P.2d 1218 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1979

Baggett v. State Election Board, Okl., 501 P.2d 817, 822-824 [1972]. … Edmondson v. State, Okl., 533 P.2d 604 [1975]; Baggett v. State Election Board, supra, at 824; Williamson v. State Election Board, Okl., 431 P.2d 352 [1967], We reaffirm today our commitment to the cited cases.

Rogers v. Oklahoma City

190 Okla. 78 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1942

The same is true to some extent in Morris v. Board of County Commissioners of Marshall County, 169 Okla. 600 , 38 P. 2d 945 , another case cited by plaintiff. … Co. v. Brown, 215 Ala. 533 , 112 So. 131 ; Federal Land Bank of Louisville v. Monroe County, 165 Tenn. 624 , 57 S. W. 2d 553 ; Cleveland, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Vettel, 81 Ind. App. 625 , 133 N.

Kent v. School District No. 28, Stephens County

106 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1925

In McCarty et al. v. … Moss v. Hunt, 40 Okla. 20 , 135 Pac. 282 ; Cobb v. Berry, 67 Okla. 29 , 168 Pac. 46 .

Goree v. Cahill

35 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1912

of an alleged election held in the town of Morris in that county on the 2d day of April, 1912, for the purpose of electing a board of trus *43 tees for the said town. … Robertson, 8 Ariz. 361 , 76 Pac. 465 ; Walker et al. v. Sanford, etc., 78 Ga. 165 , 1 S. E. 424 ; Melvin’s Case, 68 Pa. 333 ; State ex rel. Wannemaker v. Alder, 87 Wis. 554 , 58 N. W. 1045 ; Williams et al. v.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 1989

In Halstead v. … See e.g., Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, 285 P.2d 1034 (Okla. 1955). ¶ 8 The first "dual membership" case decided by the Oklahoma Supreme Court was Woodward v. City of Anadarko, 351 P.2d 292 (Okla. 1960).

Purcell v. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc.

961 P.2d 188 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1998

Hill v. Board of Education, 1997 OK 111, ¶ 12 , 944 P.2d 930, 933 ; Bryant v. Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety, 1996 OK 134 , ¶ 11, 937 P.2d 496, 500 . … Hill v. Board of Education, supra , Bryant v. Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety, supra . The Legislature has now removed the statutory language referring to the 12% rate as a penalty.

Central Plastics Company v. Goodson

537 P.2d 330 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1975

National Tile Board Corp. v. Panelboard Mfg. Co., 27 N.J.Super. 348 , 99 A.2d 440 (1953). The courts in Furr’s, Inc. v. United Specialty Advertising Company, 338 S.W.2d 762, 765 (Tex.Civ.App.1960) and in Houser v. … Weigand Co. v. Harold E.

Matney v. King

20 Okla. 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1908

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma, in Cameron v. … Thus in Rex v.

Daniels v. Scott

340 P.2d 223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1959

Parks, 182 Okl. 598 , 78 P.2d 791, 792 , in reversing Board of County Com’rs of Lincoln County v. … Co. v. Haxton Steam Heater Co., 18 Ill.App. 484, 485 , cited in Houston v. Brown, supra, the court said, “The order was not final.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 8, 2003

White v. Wint, 638 P.2d 1109 , 1112-13 (Okla. 1981); Byars v. State, 102 P. 804 , (syllabus ¶ 1) (Okla.Crim. 1909). … Cartwright v.

McSpadden v. Mahoney

402 P.2d 656 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1964

In the case of Lacer v. … In the second paragraph of the syllabus to Brown v.

Education Service Center of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Independent School District I-1 Pottawatomie County

68 O.B.A.J. 415 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1996

In support of the verdict, School Board relies on Sears v. … School Board also cites Nottingham v.

Independent School District No. I-20 of Muskogee County v. Oklahoma State Department of Education

74 O.B.A.J. 731 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 2003

Protest of Downing, 1933 OK 387 , ¶ -, 23 P.2d 173 ; Syracuse Trust Co. v. Board of Sup’rs of Oneida County, 258 A.D. 17 , 15 N.Y.S.2d 920 (1939); Christofferson v. … Independent School District No. 1 v. Howard, 1959 OK 17, ¶ 7 , 336 P.2d 1097 ; Consolidated School Dist. No. 6 v. Panther Oil & Grease Mfg. Co., 1946 OK 137, ¶ 4 , 168 P.2d 613 ; Board of Education of School Dist.

Consolidated School Dist. No. 2 v. Crowder

111 Okla. 125 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1925

contention, School District v. olvin, 10 Kan. 283 , wherein the Supreme Court of Kansas held that the board and teacher might enter into a contract specifying other conditions which would authorize the removal or discharge … board.”

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

146 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 11, 1930

The protestant relies upon the rule announced by this court in Grubb v. Smiley, 140 Okla. 233 , 283 Pac. 784 , and C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. … LESTER, V. C. J., absent.