Case law

The M. M. Hamilton

17 F. Cas. 555 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 15, 1873

she stood to the westward, and when about half way across the channel, discovered the schooner nearly up to Fort Constitution without lights, but the mate of sloop, who was then acting as master, the captain not being on board … In Quinn v.

Hider v. City of Portland Planning Bd.

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 15, 2012

The Board has sufficient interest in the outcome of this dispute, since it concerns the constitutionality of its own procedures, to remain as a party to the case. See Nisbet v. … Mutton Hill Estates, Inc. v. Oakland, 46S A.2d 989, 992 (Me. 19S3).

Connon v. The Colony Hotel

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 15, 2000

Comeau v. Maine Coastal Services , 449 A.2d 362, 365. … The Court reasoned that “[e]ven though in Brown v.

The Clotilda

5 F. Cas. 1075 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1872

employed on board on the 14th. … In Houseman v. The North Carolina, 15 Pet [40 U. S.] 40, Taney, C.

United States v. Mahone

328 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 6, 2004

In United States v. Brown, 603 F.2d 1022 (1st Cir.1979), the First Circuit cited then-judge Burger’s opinion in Gordon v. … Almost two years after Brown , the First Circuit reinforced its broad interpretation of crimes of dishonesty in United States v.

Roque Island Gardner Homestead Corp. v. Town of Jonesport

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2020

In RIGHC v. Town of Jonesport, No. 2016-003 (BPTR, May 18, 2017), the State Board held that al! … Centamore v. Dep't of Human Servs., 664 A.2d 369, 370 (Me. 1995).

Maquoit Bay LLC v. Department of Marine Resources

271 A.3d 1183 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 2022

See Kurzon v. U.S. … In Uliano I, we vacated a Board of Environmental Protection decision after holding that the Board misapplied the Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) rule that “‘no activity shall be permitted if there is a practicable

J.R.M., Inc. v. City of Portland

669 A.2d 159 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 26, 1995

In Mitchell v. … (quoting Hall v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 266 (Me.1985)). III.

Loder v. State of Maine

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 19, 2011

Moody v. State Liquor & Lottery Comm 'n, 2004 ME 20, ~ 7, 843 A.2d 43 (quoting Livonia v. Town of Rome, 1998 ME 39, ~ 5, 707 A.2d 83). … See South Portland Civil Service Comm 'n v.

State v. Lovell

390 A.2d 1107 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 6, 1978

State v. Pomerleau, Me., 363 A.2d 692 (1976). … State v. Elwell, supra. The entry is: Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed. .

Inhabitants of Milford v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.

104 Me. 233 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 11, 1908

In Watson v. … In Stock v.

Thron v. Town of Kittery

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 16, 2015

Without the Board's findings or conclusions, this court cannot engage in meaningful review of the decision. This matter is therefore appropriate for remand. See Hartwell v. … to the agency or board to make the findings.")

MAINE MARITIME ACADEMY v. FITCH

District Court, D. Maine · Sep 18, 2019

Guidry v. S. La. … Contra Brown v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 984 F.2d 674, 679 (5th Cir. 1993) (where borrowing employer verified employee’s time tickets daily, factor supported borrowed servant status).

Nicholson, M.D. v. State of Maine, Bd. of Licensure in Med.

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 30, 2006

NICHOLSON, M.D., Petitioner v. … the Board.

State v. Blackington

111 Me. 229 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 5, 1913

This, however, is but a restatement of the view expressed in State v. Robinson, 85 Maine, 195. … Without further comment, if precedents were required, we think State v. Robinson and Commonwealth v.

Damon v. S.D. Warren Co.

990 A.2d 1028 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 23, 2010

We are thus presented with the question that we expressly left open in Pendexter v. … See, e.g., id,.; Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 651 A.2d 358, 360-61 (Me.1994); Berry v. H.R.

Gould v. Bangor & Piscataquis Railroad

82 Me. 122 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1889

This principle was decided in McCluer v. Manchester & Lawrence Railroad, 13 Gray, 124 , 129. True that case was founded upon an alleged breach of a contract. But the defense was the same as in this. … It must, perhaps, be further conceded that a fence made of barbed wire “protected by an upper rail or board of wood,” may, under the proviso attached to § 1, c. 22, R.

Boutet v. Residents of the Town of Old Orchard Beach

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 8, 2016

Boutet et. al v. Residents ofthe Town of Old Orchard Beach, BCD-AP-16-07 at 18 (Me. Super. Ct., BCD Cumb. … Boutet, Inc., & Pine Ridge Realty Corp. v. Residents of the Town of Old Orchard Beach, Town of Old Orchard Beach Planning Board & Dominator Golf, LLC BCD-AP-2016-06 Ronald A. Boutet, Barbara A.

Pride v. King

133 Me. 378 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 20, 1935

McLellan v. Crofton, supra, at page 337; Lancey v. Maine Central Railroad, supra. … Words & Phrases, Third Series, Vol. 1, page 145; McMahon v. Brown, 219 Mass., 23, 27 , 106 N. E., 576 , 578; Chace v. Trafford, 116 Mass., 529, 532 .

Sterns Lumber Co. v. John H. Rice Co.

260 F. 434 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 6, 1919

Co. v. Walker (D. C.) 139 Red. 855; Merritt v. Sprague (D. C.) 191 Fed. 627 ; Docks v. Gibbs, 11 House of Lords Cases, 512; Hartford, etc., Transportation Co. v. Hughes (D. C.) 125 Fed. 981 ; Smith v. Burnett, 173 U. … Thompson v. Winslow (D. C.) 128 Fed. 84 ; Philadelphia Railway Co. v. Walker (D. C.) 139 Fed. 855 ; Union Ice Co. v. Crowell, 55 Fed. 87 , 5 C. C. A. 49 ; Merritt v. Sprague (D. C.) 191 Fed. 627 . But Capt.