Case law

Greater Southeast Community Hospital Foundation, Inc., Etc. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

407 F.2d 712 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 16, 1969

Here, the Board seems to have adopted an ad hoc approach. The Board has ruled that the Hadley Memorial Hospital is exempt “because it is owned and operated by the Seventh-Adventist denomination.” … Had the Board found to be substantial in nature the Hadley activities which it described as “ancillary,” a quite possibly different result might have followed. Cf. Better Business Bureau v.

Petkas v. Staats

364 F. Supp. 680 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 1973

Getman v. National Labor Relations Board, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 209 , 450 F.2d 670 at 673 (1971), citing Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. v. Veterans Administration, 301 F.Supp. 796, 802 (S.D.N.Y.1969). … In Sterling Drug, Inc. v.

United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Local No. 150 v. National Labor Relations Board

1 F.3d 24 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 1993

Compare Retail, Wholesale & Dep't Store Union v. NLRB, 466 F.2d 380, 390 (D.C.Cir.1972) (applying a five-factor test) with Consolidated Freightways v. … Local 900, Int'l Union of Electrical Workers v.

Anne C. Sanders v. United States of America, Department of the Army Surgeon General

551 F.2d 458 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 1977

Jones v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, 143 U.S.App.D.C. 51, 52-53 , 442 F.2d 773, 774-775 (1971). See also: Reilly v. United States, 513 F.2d 147 (8th Cir. 1975); Coyne v. … United States, 411 F.2d 987 (5th Cir. 1969); Brown v. United States, 353 F.2d 578 (9th Cir. 1965).

Bauldock v. Davco Food, Inc.

622 A.2d 28 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1993

See Feldt v. Marriott Corp., 322 A.2d 913, 915 (D.C.1974); accord, O’Brien v. … See Finkelstein v. District of Columbia, 593 A.2d 591, 594 (D.C.1991) (en banc); Spain v. McNeal, 337 A.2d 507, 508 (D.C. 1975); Morgan v.

Davenport v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

579 A.2d 1155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1990

Hershon v. … See Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown v.

Galen Hospital Alaska, Inc. v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2020

Board.” Id. Normally, “the Board would review the claim, and the hospital would retain the right to seek ‘judicial review of any final decision of the Board.’” Id. (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1)). … Brown v. Felson, 442 U.S. 127, 139 n.10 (1979).

Anderson v. United States

857 A.2d 451 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2004

Brown did not make such statements. See, e.g., Taylor v. United States, 608 A.2d 451, 461 (D.C.) … Brown’s grand jury testimony that she did not see what occurred in the alley. Furthermore, Ms. Brown testified at trial.

Murphy v. New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co.

273 F. 305 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 1921

He knew the accusations that had been made against the appellants, and knew what the officers were on board for. … Brown v. United States, 35 App. D. C. 548, Ann. Cas. 1912A, 388. No note is made of that decision in the opinion. How are the bench and bar to regard it in the future — as overruled or as still the law of the District?

Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Ottenheimer and Company, Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Ottenheimer and Company, Inc.

334 F.2d 581 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1964

334 F.2d 581 AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Ottenheimer and Company, Inc., Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … We think the evidence did not require the Board to uphold the Union's claim in this respect. 3 In No. 18180, the question is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Board's findings of employer violations of Section

Davis v. United States

735 A.2d 467 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 1999

Corda, which was Brown’s neighborhood. … See, e.g., Jefferson v.

Burnette v. United States

600 A.2d 1082 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 1991

See Speight v. United States, 599 A.2d 794, 796 (D.C.1991); In re T.M., 577 A.2d 1149 , 1151 & n. 5 (D.C.1990); Bernard v. United States, 575 A.2d 1191, 1195 (D.C.1990) (citing Brown v. … Brown, 546 A.2d at 397 ; see also Easley v. United States, 482 A.2d 779, 782 (D.C.1984).

International Brotherhood of Operative Potters, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Aztec Ceramics Company, Intervenor. Aztec Ceramics Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Operative Potters, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

320 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 1963

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations, Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). Cf. Wheeler v. National Labor Relations Board, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 255 , 314 F.2d 260 (1963). … The award of back pay is clearly within the scope of traditional Board remedies. See National Labor Relations Board v.

United States v. Zabavsky

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 2022

See United States v. Sutton, Criminal No. 21-0598, 2022 WL 13940371 (D.D.C. Oct. 23, 2022). … Hylton-Brown, and any allegations of Mr. Hylton-Brown’s connection to or membership in the Kennedy Street Crew or KDY, may not be offered into evidence at trial; it is FURTHER ORDERED that any evidence related to Mr.

United Scenic Artists, Local 829, Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

762 F.2d 1027 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 24, 1985

See NLRB v. … United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711, 713, n. 1 , 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1481, n. 1 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983), citing Texas Department of Community Affairs v.

Greene County Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

317 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 21, 1963

We think, however, that the record supports the Board’s contrary determination. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McComb, 337 U.S. 755 (1949); Lucas County Farm Coop. Ass’n v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Reliance Fuel Oil Corp., supra.

Bismullah ex rel. Bismullah v. Gates

514 F.3d 1291 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 2008

Hamdi v. … Hosps. v.

Culinary Workers And Bartenders Union Local 535 v. National Labor Relations Board

310 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 1962

310 F.2d 853 114 U.S.App.D.C. 48 CULINARY WORKERS AND BARTENDERS UNION LOCAL 535, Affiliated with the Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. … The Board's order will accordingly be affirmed and enforced. 2 So ordered.

Beatty v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 2026

See, e.g., Marshall as co-trustee of 4-M River Farm Tr. v. Munder, No. 23-cv-1985, 2023 WL 7325935, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 7, 2023); see also Cook v. Marshall, 126 F.4th 1031 (5th Cir. 2025); Brown v. … Brown-Thill, 762 F.3d 814 (8th Cir. 2014); Grede v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 598 F.3d 899 (7th Cir. 2010); Monahan v. Holmes, 139 F. Supp. 2d 253 (D.

Alkanani v. Aegis Defense Services, LLC

976 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2013

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, District Judge. … District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson by Minute Order dated 4/5/2013.