Case law

J. M. F. v. State

427 P.3d 154 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 2, 2018

Evans v. State , 26 Okla.Crim. 9 , 1924 OK CR 4 , ¶ 18, 221 P. 794 , 797, overruled in part on other grounds by Neill v. State , 1994 OK CR 69 , ¶ 33, 896 P.2d 537 , 550. As set forth in Johnson v. … Johnson v. State , 2004 OK CR 23 , ¶¶ 17-18, 93 P.3d 41 , 46.

Burkhart v. Jacob

70 O.B.A.J. 647 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1999

See Shell Pipe Line, 287 P.2d at 681 ; Swensen v. Marino 306 Mass. 582 , 29 N.E.2d 15, 17 (1940). ¶ 13 The Burkharts rely on Wells v. … V.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 21, 1994

V. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD, 742 P.2D 15 (OKLA.1987). … SEE: LETELLIER V. CLELAND AT 437 F.SUPP. 939.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 6, 1994

POULOS V. … IN 1982, IN A CASE BROUGHT BY THE SAME PLAINTIFF, THE COURT RULED THAT THE BOARD HAD CONTINUED TO FAIL TO ADOPT A STANDARD ASSESSMENT RATIO. STATE EX REL. POULOS V.

Blevins v. Harris

172 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1935

Rich v. Doneghey, 71 Okla. 204 , 177 P. 86 , 3 A. L. R. 352; C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Capshaw, 145 Okla. 237 , 292 P. 841 ; Cuff v. Koslosky, 165 Okla. 135 , 25 P. (2d) 290 . The case of Marrs v. … Gant v. Oklahoma City, 160 Okla. 62 , 15 P. (2d) 833 . Contract and property rights are held subject to a fair exercise of the police power. Marrs v. City of Oxford, supra; Crowley v. Christensen, 137 U. S. 86, 11 . S.

Town of Comanche v. Ferguson

67 Okla. 101 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1917

Alexander v. Worthington, 5 Md. 471 ; Lee v. Roberts, 3 Okla. 106 , 44 Pac. 505 ; Ratliff v. Fleener, 43 Okla. 652 , 143 Pac. 1051 . Section 7378, Rev. … L. 1915, provides: “All moneys received by the board of county commissioners for road and bridge purposes shall be paid out only on order of said board, for the purchase of tools, machinery and equipment, or for work done

HALL v. CUTSINGER

345 P.3d 412 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 2015

Vance Brown, Elisabeth D. Brown, ELIAS, BROOKS, BROWN & NELSON, P.C., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Interested Party/Appellee. Bay Mitchell, Presiding Judge: ¶1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Norma J. Hall (Hall) and Kathryn S. … See Fleck v.

PARSON v. FARLEY

2025 OK CIV APP 10 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 2025

See Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. , 1992 OK 72 833 P.2d 1218 Hill v. … Board of Education, District I-009, Jones, Oklahoma , 1997 OK 111 In the Matter of the Estate of Foresee , 2020 OK 88 475 P.3d 862 See Discover Bank v.

Johnson v. Grady County

50 Okla. 188 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1915

In Anderson v. … Divet v. Richland County, 8 N.D. 65 , 76 N.W. 993 ; Kafka v. Wilkinson, 99 Md. 238 , 57 A. 617 ; Scharf v. Tasker, 73 Md. 378 , 21 A. 56 ; Ballentyne v. Wickersham, 75 Ala. 533 ; Holcomb v. Rock Island Ry.

TRENTHAM v. ISAACS

2014 OK CIV APP 35 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 2013

Mayor also relies on City of Muskogee v. … SENTER Discussed at Length 1966 OK 59 , 412 P.2d 953 , DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES, INC. v. CITY OF NORMAN Discussed 1973 OK 121 , 518 P.2d 1105 , MOREHEAD v.

Groves v. Bumgarner

662 P.2d 307 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 1983

Const., and by reason of Edmondson v. State ex rel. Phelps, Okl., 533 P.2d 604 (1974); Helm v. State Election Board, Okl., 589 P.2d 224 (1979); Hembree v. City of Stilwell, Okl., 597 P.2d 1218 (1979).

Dye

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Feb 26, 2026

Lopez v. LeMaster, 172 F.3d 756, 763 (10th Cir. 1999), abrogated in part on other grounds, Brown v. Flowers, 974 F.3d 1178, 1182 (10th Cir. 2020); see also OKLA. STAT. tit. 19, § 513; OKLA. STAT. tit. 57, §§ 47, 52. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403-04 (1997).

Education Service Center of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Independent School District I-1 Pottawatomie County

68 O.B.A.J. 415 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1996

In support of the verdict, School Board relies on Sears v. … School Board also cites Nottingham v.

Moore v. Porterfield

125 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1927

See Moore et al. v. … S. 1921), as construed by Jumper et al. v.

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1979

City of Ardmore, v. Excise Board of Carter County, Okl., 197 P.2d 961 (1948). The county excise board is not authorized to refuse to make appropriations required by law to be made. Excise Board of Creek County v. … City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County, 155 Okl. 126 , 8 P.2d 2 (1932).

Mason v. Ackley

52 Okla. 157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1915

In Bank of Welch v. … et al. v.

Application of B of E of City of Ardmore

173 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1935

But in Curtis v. Board of Co. … Honnold v. Board of Com’rs, 71 Okla. 71 , 177 P. 71 ; News-Dispatch, etc., Co. v. Bd. of Com’rs, 130 Okla. 152 , 266 P. 437 , overruling Maryland Cas. Co. v. Bd. of Com’rs, 128 Okla. 58 , 260 P. 1112 .

State Ex Rel. West v. Frame

38 Okla. 446 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1913

De Lima v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 197 , 21 Sup. Ct. 753, 45 L. Ed. 1041 . The foregoing general rule has no application to the class of laws now under consideration. … Arie v. State, 1 Okla. Or. 666, 100 Pac. 23 ; State v. Chaney et al., 23 Okla. 788 , 102 Pac. 133 ; Frick v. Oats, 20 Okla. 473 , 94 Pac. 682 .

Holway v. World Publishing Co.

171 Okla. 306 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1935

Matthews v. Oklahoma Publishing Co., 103 Okla. 40 , 219 P. 947 ; M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Watkins, 77 Okla. 270 , 188 P. 99 ; Kee v. … In Hargrove v.

Protest of Wilhite

150 Okla. 29 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1931

Hull et al. v. Board of Education of City of Bartlesville, (his day decided, 150 Okla. 30 , 300 Pac. 775 . … CLARK, V. C. J:, dissents. SWINDALL, X, absent. KORNEGAY, J., disqualified.