Case law

United States v. Shane Browne

953 F.3d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 2020

Browne relies predominantly on Kpodi and United States v. Smith, 267 F.3d 1154 (D.C. Cir. 2001), to support this argument. … Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500, 504–05 (2003); see also United States v. Rashad, 331 F.3d 908, 909 (D.C.

Anderson v. United States

857 A.2d 451 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2004

Brown did not make such statements. See, e.g., Taylor v. United States, 608 A.2d 451, 461 (D.C.) … Brown’s grand jury testimony that she did not see what occurred in the alley. Furthermore, Ms. Brown testified at trial.

Ruth De Pratter v. Guy Farmer, Individually and as Chairman and Members of the National Labor Relations Board

232 F.2d 74 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1956

Inland Empire District Council, etc. v. Millis, 1945, 325 U.S. 697 , 700, 65 S.Ct. 1316, 1318 , 89 L.Ed. 1877 . We think no such showing has been made here. Unlike Farmer v. … American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board, 1940, 308 U.S. 401 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 ; Norris, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1949, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 106 , 177 F.2d 26 ; Millis v.

Hardy v. Yellen

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 2018

P. 56(a); see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247 (1986); Celotex Corp v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). … Nurriddin v. Goldin, 382 F. Supp. 2d 79, 92 (D.D.C. 2005) (citing Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832 (1976)); see also 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c).

Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, (Two Cases), Delta Air Lines, Inc., Intervenor. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Texas International Airlines, Inc., Intervenor

494 F.2d 1118 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 20, 1974

JA at 23 35 Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. … See Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v.

Jones v. United States

999 A.2d 917 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2010

After a discussion with both parties and Jones’s renewed request for a mistrial, the court decided to give the jury an instruction based on a jury charge given by the trial court in Brown v. … Additionally, the continued deliberations after the Brown instruction “strong[ly] indicate] that the jurors did not surrender their will.” Coleman v. United States, 515 A.2d 439, 453 (D.C.1986).

Local Union No. 98 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

433 F.2d 1189 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 18, 1970

We stated in Teamsters Local 710 v. … Lewis v. NLRB, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 18 , 350 F.2d 801 (1965) ; Meat and Highway Drivers, etc., Teamsters Local 710 v. NLBB, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 287 , 335 F.2d 709 (1964) ; Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413 v.

Soft Drink Workers Union Local 812, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board

657 F.2d 1252 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 3, 1980

NLRB v. … NLRB v.

Rogers v. Del Toro

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2026

Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1276 (D.C. Cir. 1994); see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

Donald W. Atwell v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Charles M. Dalla v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Ralph K. Caldwell v. General Services Administration and Merit Systems Protection Board, James D. Allen v. Veterans Administration and Merit Systems Protection Board, Berma F. Carter and National Federation of Federal Employees v. John F. Lehman, Jr., Secretary, Department of the Navy

670 F.2d 272 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 18, 1981

ATWELL, et al., Petitioners, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. Charles M. DALLA, et al., Petitioners, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. Ralph K. CALDWELL, et al., Petitioners, v. … GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondents. James D. ALLEN, Petitioner, v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION and Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondents. Berma F.

United States v. Gale

314 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 7, 2003

Under United States v. … This case is thus *5 unlike the ones cited by Gale, Kyles v. Whitley and Strickler v.

Parker v. United States

601 A.2d 45 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1991

The trial judge concluded that upon seeing the brown paper bag, the police had probable cause, and he therefore denied the motion to suppress. 12 In United States v. … Beatty v. United States, 544 A.2d 699, 701 (D.C.1988). 17 The government in this case proceeded on the theory that both appellants constructively possessed 18 the drugs found in the brown paper bag.

Greater Southeast Community Hospital Foundation, Inc., Etc. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

407 F.2d 712 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 16, 1969

Here, the Board seems to have adopted an ad hoc approach. The Board has ruled that the Hadley Memorial Hospital is exempt “because it is owned and operated by the Seventh-Adventist denomination.” … Had the Board found to be substantial in nature the Hadley activities which it described as “ancillary,” a quite possibly different result might have followed. Cf. Better Business Bureau v.

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Disston Division-Danville Works v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America,afl-Cio, Intervenor

389 F.2d 295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1967

389 F.2d 295 128 U.S.App.D.C. 344 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., DISSTON DIVISION-DANVILLE WORKS, Petitioner, v. … Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v. (National) Labor (Relations) Board, 319 U.S. 533, 540 , ( 63 S.Ct. 1214 , 87 L.Ed. 1568 ).' Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v.

Morris v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

975 A.2d 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 2009

Brown v. Corrections Corp. of America, 942 A.2d 1122, 1125 (D.C.2008) (citing Colton v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 484 A.2d 550, 552 (D.C.1984)). III. Analysis A. … See Claim of Ardito, 254 A.D.2d 562 , 678 N.Y.S.2d 699, 699 (N.Y.App.Div.1998); Brown Hotel Co. v. White, 365 S.W.2d 306, 307 (Ky.1962); Drummond v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONTRACT APPEALS BOARD, and PRINCE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., and W.M. SCHLOSSER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC

145 A.3d 523 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 2016

Sys., Inc. v. … Historical support for the liberal approach to notice requirements adopted by other boards of contract appeals and federal courts can be found in United States v. Cunningham, 125 F.2d 28, 30 (D.C.

Guangsha Wang v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd.

142 A.3d 575 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 2016

Beg Investments, LLC v. Alberti

85 F. Supp. 3d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2015

Strike at 3–5 (quoting Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 (1997)). … V.

Davenport v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

579 A.2d 1155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1990

Hershon v. … See Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown v.

Eisenberg v. West Virginia Office of Disciplinary Counsel

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2020

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (rule 12(b)(6) case); Food and Water Watch, Inc. v. Vilsack, 808 F.3d 905, 913 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (rule 12(b)(1) case). I. … See Kowal, 16 F.3d at 1276; see also Browning, 292 F.3d at 242.