Case law

State v. Davilla

234 Or. App. 637 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 2010

State v. Davilla, 196 Or App 783 , 103 P3d 671 (2004) (Davilla V). 2 II. … See Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v.

Devroe v. Portland Ry. L. & P. Co.

64 Or. 547 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1913

Wills v. Palmer Lumber Co., 58 Or. 536 ( 115 Pac. 417 ) ; Purdy v. Van Keuren, 60 Or. 263 ( 110 Pac. 149 ) ; Atherton v. Walling, 61 Or. 384 ( 121 Pac. 796 ) ; State v. Michellod, 62 Or. 271 ( 124 Pac. 263 ) ; Hofer v. … Anderson v. North Pac. Lbr. Co., 21 Or. 281 ( 28 Pac. 5 ) ; Manning v. Portland Shipbuilding Co., 52 Or. 101 ( 96 Pac. 545 ) ; Geldard v. Marshall, 43 Or. 438 ( 73 Pac. 330 ) ; Miller v.

Pavlicek v. State Industrial Accident Commission

235 Or. 490 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1963

The workman rejected the order and a board of medical review was subsequently selected. The workman was examined by the board. The board concurred in the decision of the Commission and the case was closed. … The workman has advanced most of the same arguments that were rejected in White v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 227 Or 306 , 362 P2d 302 (1961).

In Re Compensation of Wild

237 Or. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 2010

ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(8)(a); SAIF v. … See, e.g., Hamilton v. Hughey, 284 Or 739, 743 , 588 P2d 38 (1978).

Harrison v. Taylor Lumber & Treating, Inc.

111 Or. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 1992

Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Department, 306 Or 134, 138 , 758 P2d 854 (1988). The pertinent rules here are not inconsistent with the agency’s statutory authority. … The Board adopted the referee’s findings.

Trevitts v. Hoffman-Marmolejo

138 Or. App. 455 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 3, 1996

The Board approved the CDA on May 21,1991. … Timberline Equipment v. St. Paul Fire & Mar. Ins., 281 Or 639, 643 , 576 P2d 1244 (1978); Slocum v. Lang, 132 Or App 571, 576 , 889 P2d 379 (1995).

Mathews v. City of La Grande

136 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 1931

the injury: Village of Shelby v. … Rep. 799 ); Shannon v. Tacoma, 41 Wash. 220 ( 83 P. 186 ); Fisher v. Anacortes, 109 Wash. 191 ( 186 P. 271 ).

Sorenson v. Daniels

364 F. Supp. 2d 1220 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 4, 2005

Sorenson appealed to the National Appeals Board, arguing the new sentence was too severe. The National Appeals Board affirmed the Parole Commission’s revocation decision, but reduced Mr. … Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.1990). This court need not delve into the issue of whether Mr. Sorenson exhausted his administrative remedies.

Aetna Casualty Co. v. Jackson

108 Or. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 24, 1991

In Randall v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., 107 Or App 599 , 813 P2d 1120 (1991), we held that ORS 656.262(10) does not provide an independent basis for the award of *257 attorney fees. … In Morgan v.

State v. Sims

287 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1979

Green, 286 Or 99 , 593 P2d 777 (1979); Tharalson v. State Dept. of Rev., 281 Or 9 , 573 P2d 298 (1978); Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Court, 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977); Deras v. … Myers, 272 Or 47 , 535 P2d 541 (1975); State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972); Dickman v. School Dist. 62C, 232 Or 238 , 366 P2d 533 (1962). In State v.

SAIF Corp. v. Abbott

107 Or. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 1991

It contends that our conclusion that it had accepted responsibility for claimant’s carpal tunnel syndrome is inconsistent with Georgia-Pacific v. Piwowar, 305 Or 494 , 753 P2d 948 (1988). … Therefore, the Board never reviewed the proper record, and the referee’s conclusions regarding employer’s acceptance could not have been adequately reviewed by the Board.

Wiedeman v. Campbell

108 Or. 55 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1923

As to this point the case is governed by the ruling-in the case of Briedwell v. Henderson, 99 Or. 506 *58 ( 195 Pac. 575 ). We have only to apply the law as announced by Mr. Justice Brown in the Briedwell case. … J., and Burnett and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Mosley

178 Or. App. 474 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2001

In State v. Brown, 301 Or 268 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986), the court first recognized the automobile exception for purposes of Article I, section 9. See generally State v. … See, e.g., Brown, 301 Or 268 ; State v.

Dean v. SAIF Corp.

72 Or. App. 16 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 1985

Price v. SAIF, supra, 296 Or at 316 . … See Winters et al v. Grimes et al, 124 Or 214 , 264 P 359 (1928); Jones v. SAIF, supra; Mendenhall v. SAIF, 16 Or App 136 , 517 P2d 706 , rev den (1974); Hammond v.

Farmers Insurance Group v. Huff

149 Or. App. 298 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 1997

The Board explained, pursuant to Dickson v. … Next, the Board concluded that under Motel 6 v.

Department of Human Services v. D. H.

269 Or. App. 863 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 18, 2015

Dept. of Human Services v. N. … Dept. of Human Services v. G. J. R., 254 Or App 436, 443 , 295 P3d 672 (2013).

State v. Unger

276 Or. App. 445 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 2016

State v. … See ORAP 5.45(1) (authorizing review of errors apparent on the record); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (describing requirements for plain error review); see also Ailes v.

Cordrey v. Steamship

102 Or. 636 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1922

.” *650 In Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172, 175 ( 44 L. Ed. 119 , 20 Sup. Ct. … Johns and Brown, JJ., concur.

Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.

271 Or. 188 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1975

Gladden, 215 Or 129 , 332 P2d 641 (1958); Brown v. Brown, 142 Or 275 , 19 P2d 428 (1933); Gust v. Edwards Co., 129 Or 409 , 274 P 919 (1929); Salene v. Isherwood, 74 Or 35 , 144 P 1175 (1914); Yuen Suey v. … Fleshman, 65 Or 606 , 133 P 803 , Ann Cas 1915A 1072 (1913); Belle v. Brown, 37 Or 588 , 61 P 1024 (1900). In Gust v.

Kolodejchuk v. Lucier

52 Or. App. 981 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 29, 1981

Fish and Wildlife Department v. LCDC, supra, 288 Or at 209 . The court in Kempf v. … See also Perkins v.