Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

7.12s

  • Wallace v. Bullen

    9 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1898

    The supreme'court of Ohio, in Chamberlin v. City of Cleveland, 84 Ohio, 551; of Iowa, in two cases, Royce v. Jenney, 50 Iowa 679, Harney v. Board, 44 Iowa 203; the supreme court of Wisconsin, in Kelly v. … Co. v. Wasco Co., 2 Oregon, 206; the supreme court of California, in Patten v. Green, 13 Cal. 329; People v. Reynolds, 28 Cal. 113, and Wells-Fargo Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublishedText from a scan
  • Payton v. City of Anadarko

    179 Okla. 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1937

    Petitioner relies upon Board of County Commissioners v. Whitlow, 88 Okla. 72 , 211 P. 1021 , and Whiteneck, Adm’x, v. … Lacy, 161 Okla. 138 , 17 P. (2d) 398 , the rule previously, announced by this court in Whiteneck, Adm’x, v. Board of Com’rs of Woods County, 89 Okla. 52 , 213 P. 865 , and Board of Com’rs of Pawnee County v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Arie v. State

    23 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1909

    Powell v. State, 69 Ala. 10 ; Fell v. State, 42 Md. 71 , 20 Am. Rep. 83 ; Kresser v. Lyman (C. C.) 74 Fed. 765 ; Board v. Barrie, 34 N. Y. 659 ; People v. Murray 149 N. Y. 367 , 44 N. E. 147 , 32 L. R. A. 344. … C.) 74 Fed. 765 ; Brown v. State, 82 Ga. 224 , 7 S. E. 915 ; State v. Mullenhoff, 74 Iowa, 271 , 37 N. W. 329 ; State v. Holmes, 38 N. H. 235; State v. Cooke, 24 Minn. 247 , 31 Am. Rep. 344 ; Ex parte Lynn, 19 Tex.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • PADDYAKER v. Griffith

    260 P.3d 1276 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 2011

    Hester v. Watts, 1950 OK 131 , 218 P.2d 641 ; see Alfrey v. … ."); see also Sullivan v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • HALL v. CUTSINGER

    345 P.3d 412 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 2015

    Vance Brown, Elisabeth D. Brown, ELIAS, BROOKS, BROWN & NELSON, P.C., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Interested Party/Appellee. Bay Mitchell, Presiding Judge: ¶1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Norma J. Hall (Hall) and Kathryn S. … See Fleck v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seabourn v. Independent School District No. I-300

    775 F. Supp. 2d 1306 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 21, 2010

    Tonkovich v. Kansas Board of Regents, 159 F.3d 504, 528 (10th Cir.1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). … Hoerman v. Western Heights Board of Education, 913 P.2d 684, 690 (Okla.Civ. App.1996).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hankins v. Hall

    176 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1936

    Yoast v. Sims, 122 Okla. 200 , 253 P. 504 ; Bass, Maxwell & Co. v. Independent Gin Co., 140 Okla. 80 , 282 P. 635 : Wagnon v. Brown, 169 Okla. 292 , 36 P. (2d) 723 ; Brotherhood of Ry. Trainmen v. … Brown, 170 Okla. 67 , 38 P. (2d) 529 ; Beatrice Creamery Co. v. Dollie Goldman, 175 Okla. 300 , 52 P. (2d) 1033 . (See, also, 56 A. L. R. 1418, and 74 A. L. R. 849.)

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1979

    City of Ardmore, v. Excise Board of Carter County, Okla., 197 P.2d 961 (1948). The county excise board is not authorized to refuse to make appropriations required by law to be made. Excise Board of Creek County v. … City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County, 155 Okla. 126 , 8 P.2d 2 (1932).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Town of Chouteau v. Blankenship

    194 Okla. 401 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1944

    In Salyer v. Jackson, 105 Okla. 212 , 232 P. 412 ; State ex rel. King v. McCurdy, 171 Okla. 445 , 43 P. 2d 124 ; Board of Com’rs of Oklahoma County v. Young, 186 Okla. 182 , 97 P. 2d 6 ; Hillsdale Co. v. … In Board of Com’rs of Oklahoma County v. Young, above, it was said: “County commissioners do not have authority to abandon highways at will.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • O'DELL v. Lamb-Grays Harbor Co.

    911 F. Supp. 490 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1995

    Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982). … Plaintiffs also rely on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Riley v. Brown & Root, Inc., 896 F.2d 474 (10th Cir.1990).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2009)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 2009

    See also Heiligman v. Chambers , 338 P.2d 144 , 147 (Okla. 1959). USE OF COUNTY RESOURCES FOR CEMETERIES "Counties have only such authority as is granted by statute." Tulsa Exposition Fair Corp. v. … See, e.g., Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McDoulett v. State

    685 P.2d 978 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1984

    Following the offense, C.F. described her assailant as a white male of medium build with brown curly hair and a scarred, pockmarked face. … Appellant does have brown curly hair and complexion scars, but he is 5'8" tall and usually weighs between 127 and 130 pounds.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1991

    OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD V. CENTRAL LIQUOR CO., 421 P.2D 244 (OKLA. 1966). … FULLER V. ODOM, 741 P.2D 449 (OKLA. 1987).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wooten v. State Ex Rel. Butler

    204 Okla. 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1951

    In the case of Byrd v. State ex rel. Roff, Co. … Leal v. Jones, 19 Ind. 356 , 81 Am. Dec. 403 , and State ex rel. Finch v. Washburn, 17 Wis. 618 ; Commonwealth ex rel. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Maben

    167 Okla. 111 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1933

    In the case of State v. Cutlip, 83 Okla. 183 , 202 P. 782 , it is said: “In an action to disbar an attorney his guilt must be clearly proven, although the proceeding is a civil action.” … For such insufficiency in the findings of fact of said board the recommendation of the Board of Governors is disapproved. RILEY, O. X, OULLISON, V. G. X, and SWINDALL, and McNEILL, JX, concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 6, 1991

    Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 349 P.2d 646 (Okla. 1960). … City of Tulsa v. Smittle, 702 P.2d 367 (Okla. 1985); Reubin v. Thompson, 406 P.2d 263 (Okla. 1965); McLean v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carey v. State Ex Rel. Doughty

    180 Okla. 50 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1937

    The plaintiffs in error contend that since the county is not mentioned in the judgment, either as a judgment creditor or judgment debtor, it is not a necessary party here, and they cite Board of Com’rs of Logan County v. … The authorities cited by the plaintiffs in error are not in conflict with this holding, for in the case of Board of Com’rs of Logan County v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1979

    Norwalk Teacher's Association v. Board of Education of the City of Norwalk, 138 Conn. 269 , 83 A.2d 482 , 31 A.L.R. 2d 1133 (1951); Fellows v. LaTronica, 377 P.2d 547 (Colo. 1962); Communications Workers of America v. … In Fellows v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. STATE BD., ETC.

    637 P.2d 1251 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1981

    Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Board of Tax-Roll Corrections of Tulsa County, Okl., 510 P.2d 680 (1973). … In Irwin v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 93-509 (1993)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 30, 1993

    V. ABERDEEN BOARD OF EDUCATION 215 N.W.2D 837 (S.D. 1974). … V. SCHOOL DIST.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.