Case law

Scott Dugas Trucking & Excavating, Inc. v. Homeplace Building & Remodeling, Inc.

651 A.2d 327 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 15, 1994

Marxsen v. Board of Dir., M.S.AD. No. 5, 591 A.2d 867, 871-72 (Me.1991) (finding that an appellee is not required to cross appeal in order to raise an alternative ground for affirmance of a judgment). … Inc. v.

Kennebec County v. Maine Pub. Employees Retirement Sys.

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 8, 2013

See MSAD 27, 2009 ME 108, ~ 25, 98S A.2d S9 (citing Levy v. … v. Pelletier, 2009 ME 11, ~ 17, 964 A.2d 6SO; City ifAuburn v. Desgrosseilliers, 578 A.2d 712, 714 (Me. 1990).

Halkett v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.

763 F. Supp. 2d 205 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 4, 2011

In DeCaire v. … In Collazo v.

The Inhabitants of the Town of Cambridge v. Hospital Administrative District No. 4

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 24, 2020

Count V seeks a declaratory judgment that the District Board acted beyond its legal power by voting to enter into the second merger agreement with EMHS. … Count V alleges that the District’s Board had no authority to enter into the Second Merger Agreement and that the Board’s approval of that agreement is therefore Ultra Vires.

Union Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Dudley

104 Me. 297 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 6, 1908

Leigh v. Norbury, 13 Ves. 340; Tier v. Pennell, 1 Edw. Ch. 354 ; 2 Wash. R. P. 318; Re Corrie, 32 Beav. 426; Re Kavenaugh, 13 Jr. Ch. 120: Drake v. Drake, 134 N. Y. 220, 224 ; Soper v. Brown, 136 N. … As said in Soper v. Brown, supra: "There are many authorities on wills in which the word has been construed to mean children only.

State of Maine v. Dale F. Thistle

2024 ME 6 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 25, 2024

See State v. Hanscom, 2016 ME 184, ¶ 10, 152 A.3d 632; State v. Lajoie, 2017 ME 8, ¶ 13, 154 A.3d 132; supra n.2. … State v.

Hynes v. Town of Kittery

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 11, 2015

Rudolph v. Golick, 2010 :ME 106, ~ 8, 8 A.3d 684. The basis for the Planning Board's decision under review here was not dependent on any factual findings. … See, e.g., Pipkin v. Cnty. of Douglas, 158 Wash.

Woodward v. Livermore Falls Water District

116 Me. 86 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 6, 1917

Piper v. Madison, 140 Wis., 311 ; 122 N. W., 730 ; People v. Detroit, 28 Mich., 229 ; 15 Am. Rep., 202 ; Aldrich v. Tripp, 11 R. I., 141; 23 Am. Rep., 434 ; Judson ,v. Winsted, 80 Conn., 384 ; 68 Atl., 999 ; Wagner v. … E., 545 ; Esberg Cigar Co. v. Portland, 34 Ore., 282 ; 55 Pac., 961 ; Brown v. Salt Lake City, 33 Utah, 222 ; 93 Pac., 540 ; Hourigan v. Norwich, 77 Conn., 358 ; 59 Atl., 487 ; Lynch v.

Terfloth v. Town of Scarborough

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 1, 2013

Camp v. Town of Shapleigh, 2008 ME 53, «][ 9, 943 A.2d 595 (quoting McGhie v. Town of Cutler, 2002 ME 62, «][ 5, 793 A.2d 504). … Toomey v. Town of Frye Island, 2008 ME 44, «][ 12, 943 A.2d 563 (quoting Sproul v. Town of Boothbay Harbor, 2000 ME 30, «][ 8, 746 A.2d 368).

Conrad v. Swan

940 A.2d 1070 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 8, 2008

Truman v. Browne, 2001 ME 182, ¶ 9 , 788 A.2d 168, 170 . … Porges v.

Thibodeau v. Etscovitz Chevrolet

365 A.2d 804 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 15, 1976

In Gordon v. … E. g., Jacobsky v. D’Alfonso & Sons, Inc., Me., 358 A.2d 511, 513 (1976); Willette v. Statler Tissue Corp., Me., 331 A.2d 365, 368-69 (1975); see 39 M.R.S.A. § 99.

United States v. Shinderman

432 F. Supp. 2d 157 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 16, 2006

United States v. LaRouche Campaign, 841 F.2d 1176, 1179 (1st Cir.1988) (quoting United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 699-700 , 94 S.Ct. 3090 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974)). … They cite United States v. Fields, 663 F.2d 880 , 881 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Cuthbertson, 651 F.2d 189 , 195 (3d Cir.1981); and United States v. Cherry, 876 F.Supp. 547, 553 (S.D.N.Y. 1995).

State v. Day

79 Me. 120 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 17, 1887

State v. Quimby, 51 Maine, 395. … State v. Wright, 53 Maine, 344; State v. Forshner, 43 N. H. 89.

Richter v. Ercolini

994 A.2d 404 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 11, 2010

Browne, 2001 ME 182, ¶¶ 6, 8 , 788 A.2d 168, 170 (same). … Hamby v.

Rich v. Hayes

101 Me. 324 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 29, 1906

Brown, 46 Maine, 418. In this case it should be observed that the “assigned claim” was a negotiable promissory note. In Ames v. … The case was expressly affirmed in Harte v. Houchin, Admr., 50 Ind. 327 ; Miner v. Miner, 8 Grattan, 1; Cook v. Lovell, 11 Iowa, 81 ; Aiken v. Bridgman, 37 Vt. 249 ; Wisdom v. Beaker, 52 Ill. 342 ; Lee v.

Inhabitants of Deer Isle v. Inhabitants of Winterport

87 Me. 37 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 10, 1894

into the toAvn of Corinth as *44 the place of her home ; no more than those of passing to and from church or public meetings or in going from one part to the other of the house or appurtenances where she was at the time boarding … Richmond v. Thomaston, 38 Maine, 232; Slate v. Walker, 77 Maine, 488; Etna v. Bremer, 78 Maine, 377.

Horton v. Town of Casco

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 16, 2012

Camp v. Town of Shapleigh, 200S ME 53, 'IT 9, 943 A.2d 595 (quoting McGhie v. Town of Cutler, 2002 ME 62, 9I 5, 793 A.2d 504). … Asso. v. Naples, 486 A.2d 91, 95 (Me. 1984) (requiring the split of an appeal regarding zoning issues to the zoning board and subdivision issues to the Superior Court).

Depositors Trust Co. v. Bruneau

144 Me. 142 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 29, 1949

Davis v. Bangor, 101 Me. 311 ; 64 A. 617 ; Keeley v. Portland, 100 Maine, 260, 61 A. 180 . The action of municipal officers, as such judicial board, must be taken with formality and entered of record. … Parol evidence cannot supply a record, and parol evidence is inadmissible to prove the action of the board, unless the record is incomplete, incorrect, or lost. Kidson v. Bangor, 99 Maine, 139, 147; 58 A. 900 .”

Hamill v. Bay Bridge Associates

714 A.2d 829 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 22, 1998

Land Use Regulation Comm’n v. … Senty v. Board of Osteopathic Examination & Registration, 594 A.2d 1068, 1072 (Me. 1991).

Giberson v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad

89 Me. 337 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 28, 1896

Chase v. Railroad, 78 Maine, 34; Allen v. Railroad, 82 Maine, 111; Smith v. Railroad, 87 Maine, 339; Romeo v. Railroad, 87 Maine, 640. The opinions of the court in Hooper v. Railroad, 81 Maine, 260, and in York v. … Hiding on the sled with him were two other men sitting opposite each other on the side boards just behind Mr. Giberson, who was sitting on the cross-seat.