Case law

Harvin v. United States

297 A.2d 774 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1972

Brown v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 203 , 338 F.2d 543 (1964); Sellers v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 209 , 271 F.2d 475 (1959) (per curiam); cf. United States v. … Brown, infra note 5), or is impermissibly seeking to invade the province of the jury. See Chavez v. United States, 258 F.2d 816 (10th Cir. 1958), cert. denied sub nom., Tenorio v.

Scm Corporation v. Langis Foods Ltd.

539 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1976

E. g., Montgomery Charter Service, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 34 , 325 F.2d 230, 234 (1963). … American Petrofína, Inc. v. Brown, 391 F.Supp. 757 (E.D.N.C.1974). Moreover, we note that commentators analyzing the section 44(d) “right of priority" uniformly disapprove of the District Court’s ruling in this case.

West Texas Utilities Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers [A. F. L.], Intervenor)

184 F.2d 233 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1950

No. 62. 32 . 29 U.S.C.A. § 160 (e); National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co., 1946, 327 U.S. 385, 388-389 , 66 S.Ct. 553 , 90 L.Ed. 739 . 33 . Pranks Bros. Co.. v. National Labor . … Relations Board,.1944, 321 U.S. 702, 704-705 , 64 S.Ct.. 817, 8g. L.Ed. 1020; Medo Photo Supply Corp. v.

Arthur L. Morgan Union, Local No. 3 v. National Labor Relations Board

463 F.2d 818 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 1972

MORGAN UNION, LOCAL NO. 3, Petitioner, v. … Universal Camera Corp. v.

Jackson v. McElroy

163 F. Supp. 257 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 1958

Brown, 339 U.S. 103 , 70 S.Ct. 495 , 94 L.Ed. 691 ; In re Yamashita, 327 U.S. 1 , 66 S.Ct. 340 , 90 L.Ed. 499 ; Swain v. United States, 165 U.S. 553 , 17 S.Ct. 448 , 41 L. Ed. 823 . 5 . … United States v. Gordon, 1 USCMA 255 , 2 CMR 161 . 9 . Decided November 19, 1953 by the Board of Review, U. S.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board

394 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1968

The Board made similar findings. … NLRB v. Lewis, 246 F.2d 886 (9th Cir. 1957).

British Overseas Airways Corporation, British West Indian Airways, Limited, and Bahamas Airways, Limited v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Cunard Eagle Airways, Ltd., Intervenors. Scandinavian Airlines System v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Cunard Eagle Airways, Ltd., Intervenors. Societe Anonyme Belge D'Exploitation De La Navigation Aerienne (Sabena) v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Cunard Eagle Airways, Ltd., Intervenors. Klm Royal Dutch Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Cunard Eagle Airways, Ltd., Intervenors

304 F.2d 952 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 1962

CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Cunard Eagle Airways, Ltd., et al., Intervenors. SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Cunard Eagle Airways, Ltd., et al., Intervenors. … SOCIETE ANONYME BELGE D'EXPLOITATION DE LA NAVIGATION AERIENNE (SABENA), Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Cunard Eagle Airways, Ltd., et al., Intervenors. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES, Petitioner, v.

United Transportation Union-General Committee of Adjustment (Go-386) v. Surface Transportation Board

9 F. App'x 21 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 25, 2001

These cases were considered on the record from the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) and on the briefs filed by the parties. … See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 559-61 , 112 S.Ct. 2130 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992).

United States v. Shane Browne

953 F.3d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 2020

Browne relies predominantly on Kpodi and United States v. Smith, 267 F.3d 1154 (D.C. Cir. 2001), to support this argument. … Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500, 504–05 (2003); see also United States v. Rashad, 331 F.3d 908, 909 (D.C.

Quality Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

505 A.2d 73 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1986

Liberty v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 410 A.2d 191, 192 (D.C.1979). Although the record is deficient, 8 such evidence does emerge. … Brown: Mr. Chairman, the vote is 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 present. Chairman Dixon: All right, fine. The motion carries.

Mewborn v. Heckler

101 F.R.D. 691 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 1984

Accord, Gillman v. United States, 53 F.R.D. 316 (S.D.N.Y.1971). Plaintiff has cited Davidson v. … Janicker v. George Washington University, 94 F.R.D. 648 (D.D.C.1982).

Ramsey v. Moniz

75 F. Supp. 3d 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2014

In Martinez v. Dep’t of the Army, 317 F.3d 511, 514 (5th Cir. 2003), the court held that a “withdrawal of [the 17  For example, in Brown v. … (quoting Brown v. City of New York, 869 F.Supp. 158, 170 (S.D.N.Y.1994))). 18 see also Payne v. Locke, 766 F. Supp. 2d 245, 250 (D.D.C. 2011); Abdelkarim v.

Gardner and North Roofing and Siding Corporation, a Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

464 F.2d 838 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 14, 1972

Von Hoffman v. City of Quincy, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 535, 550 , 18 L.Ed. 403 (1866). … The Board’s construction of the statute is entitled to deference, and we find nothing unreasonable in its use of its authority, under section 105 of the Act, to issue the regulation. Udall v.

Julius W. Hobson v. Board of Elections for the District of Columbia

444 F.2d 874 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 11, 1971

See Loughborough v. Blake, 18 U.S. (95 Wheat.) 317 , 5 L.Ed. 98 (1820); Heald v. District of Columbia, 259 U.S. 114 , 42 S.Ct. 434 , 66 L.Ed. 852 (1922); Carliner v. … No. 20,838, decided September 29, 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 914 , 87 S.Ct. 863 , 17 L.Ed.2d 787 (1967); Moore v. Board of Elections, 319 F.Supp. 437 (D.D.C.1970); Lyons v.

Union of Professional Airmen (An Affiliate of the Air Line Pilots Association International) v. Civil Aeronautics Board

511 F.2d 423 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 11, 1975

See Air Line Pilots Association v. CAB, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 199, 202 , 494 F.2d 1118, 1121 (1974); Hughes Air Corporation v. CAB, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 301, 303 , 492 F.2d 567 , 569 (1973). … At least as to carriers operating under a certificate, Congress by section 401(k)(4) has given the Board such jurisdiction and certified the Board’s competency to exercise it. See Air Line Pilots Association v.

Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Wien Alaska Airlines, Inc., Northern Consolidated Airlines, Inc., Intervenors

285 F.2d 672 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 1960

The Board is authorized to issue a certificate when the public convenience and necessity so require. 3 Having an application before it, the Board issues the certificate upon such terms, i. e., routes, points, etc., as the … Civil Aeronautics Board v. State Airlines, 33S U.S. 572, 70 S.Ct. 379 , 94 L. Ed. 353 (1950). 5 . Supra note 1 . 6 . Sec. 102 of the Act, 72 Stat. 740 (1958), 49 U.S.C.A. § 1302 . 7 . 4 C.A.B. 670 (1944).

Anderson v. United States

857 A.2d 451 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2004

Brown did not make such statements. See, e.g., Taylor v. United States, 608 A.2d 451, 461 (D.C.) … Brown’s grand jury testimony that she did not see what occurred in the alley. Furthermore, Ms. Brown testified at trial.

Western Resources, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, Santa Fe Pacific Corporation, Intervenors

109 F.3d 782 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 1997

Co. v. ICC, 736 F.2d 708 , 717 (D.C.Cir.1984). … Co. v. ICC, 580 F.2d 623 , 630-31 (D.C.Cir.1978); see also Associated Gas Distributors v.

Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, (Two Cases), Delta Air Lines, Inc., Intervenor. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Texas International Airlines, Inc., Intervenor

494 F.2d 1118 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 20, 1974

JA at 23 35 Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. … See Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v.

Jones v. United States

999 A.2d 917 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2010

After a discussion with both parties and Jones’s renewed request for a mistrial, the court decided to give the jury an instruction based on a jury charge given by the trial court in Brown v. … Additionally, the continued deliberations after the Brown instruction “strong[ly] indicate] that the jurors did not surrender their will.” Coleman v. United States, 515 A.2d 439, 453 (D.C.1986).