Case law

Kelley v. Kelley

195 Tenn. 649 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1953

In Brown v. … It is argued by complainant that this Brown case is in conflict with the holding in the Walton case, but it is to be observed that in Brown v. Brown, 155 Tenn. 530 , 296 S.

Robert Otis Simerly v. State of Tennessee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · May 29, 2013

State v. Donaven Brown, W1999-00629-CCA-R3-CD, slip op. at 3 (Tenn. Crim. App., Jackson, Sept. 14, 2000). The state called both Benson and Dodd to testify. … Smith v. State, 357 S.W.3d 322, 341 (Tenn. 2011) (quoting Bean v. Bailey, 280 S.W.3d 798, 805 (Tenn. 2009).

Claude T. Phillips v. Northwest Correctional Complex, Warden Henry Steward

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 27, 2012

Citing Board of Responsibility v. … Board of Prof'l Responsibility v. Cawood, 330 S.W.3d at 609.

Smith v. Burks

43 Tenn. App. 32 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 26, 1957

The rule is well stated in Lange v. St. … Co. v. Bryan, 107 Ind. 51 , 7 N.

WILLIAMS, BOBBY v. HUB GROUP, Inc.

2026 TN WC 69 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 19, 2026

Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2025); Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If HUB meets this burden, Mr. … Hutchins v. Cardinal Glass Indus., No. E2023-00587-SC-R3-WC, 2024 Tenn. LEXIS 3, at *11 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Jan. 11, 2024).  Just as in Hutchins, Mr.

State of Tennessee v. Robert Winters

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 25, 2024

Brown, 479 S.W.3d at 211. … State v. Durell, No. E2022-01800-CCA-R3-CD, 2023 WL 6060574, at *3 (Tenn. Crim. App. Sept. 18, 2023) (quoting Brown, 479 S.W.3d at 209), no perm. app. filed.

Jones v. City of Jackson

195 Tenn. 329 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1953

“Be It Ordained by the Board of Commissioners of the City of Jackson: “¡Section 1. … Where the specific power to regulate a business is conferred by the Legislature’upon the Board of Commissioners of a city, such Board of Commissioners has the right to “regulate” and to adjust by rule, method or governing

City of Milan, TN v. Frederick H. Agee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 2, 2025

He was appointed to finish out the term of General Garry Brown, who retired. General Agee completed General Brown’s term and then won an elected term in August 2022. … Brown stated it was not necessary at the time.

Harris v. Williamson County

835 S.W.2d 588 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 17, 1992

Hale v. Johnston, 140 Tenn. 182, 197 , 203 S.W. 949 , 953 (1918). In Bowers v. … Pearler [v.

Clinchfield Railroad Company v. Forbes

57 Tenn. App. 174 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 2, 1966

Rose & Co. v. … Johnston v. Cincinnati N. O. & T. P. R. Co., 146 Tenn. 135, 149 , 240 S.W. 429 ; Finchem v. Oman, 18 Tenn.App. 40, 49, 50 , 72 S.W.2d 564, 570 .’ ” In Poole v. First Natl.

Derek Davis v. Shelby County Sheriff's Department

Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 20, 2009

of Education v. … Inc. v. Shim, 226 S.W.3d 366, 373 (Tenn. 2007). The Board’s Decision to Terminate Mr.

State of Tennessee v. Kevin Brazelton

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 13, 2021

Officer Parnell broadcast the suspect’s description and the information about the brown van over the police radio. … Hugueley, 185 S.W.3d at 369 (quoting Woodson v. Porter Brown Limestone Co., 916 S.W.2d 896, 906 (Tenn 1996)).

Mayberry v. Endocrinology-Diabetes Associates

926 F. Supp. 1315 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 31, 1996

The only reason Plaintiff believes Brown wanted her to quit is that she believes Brown made the change in Plaintiffs scheduled hours of work by one-half hour. … Brown did not even speak to Plaintiff.” Personality conflicts alone cannot supply a basis for a discrimination claim. Ackerman v. Diamond Shamrock Corp., 670 F.2d 66, 70 (6th Cir. 1982).

Eyring v. East Tennessee Baptist Hospital

950 S.W.2d 354 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 29, 1997

as a condition precedent to an assessment by the Board. … State v. King, 635 S.W.2d 113, 114 (Tenn.1982).

Sharp v. Fly

68 Tenn. 4 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1876

Sb that this part of the proposition is undoubtedly sound, -as is virtually conceded in the argument of Judge Cooper in Brown v. … The -argument of Judge Cooper in Brown v.

HICKS, CLIFFORD MONTRELL v. FULLEN DOCK AND WAREHOUSE

2026 TN WC 49 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 27, 2026

Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2025); Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Fullen Dock meets this burden, Mr. … Hutchins v. Cardinal Glass Indus., No. E2023- 00587-SC-R3-WC, 2024 Tenn. LEXIS 3, at *11 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Jan. 11, 2024).

Vanessa Sircy v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 3, 2005

In support of its argument, Metro relies primarily on the cases of City of Lebanon v. Baird, 756 S.W.2d 236 (Tenn. 1988) and Brown v. City of Manchester, 722 S.W.2d 394 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). … Metro also contends that the trial court misapplied the case of Brown v. City of Manchester. See Brown, 722 S.W.2d at 394.

White, Randy v. Boles Trucking

2016 TN WC App. 63 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 14, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Randy White ) Docket No. 2016-04-0074 ) v. … order or by memorandum opinion, whichever the Appeals Board deems appropriate, in cases that are not legally and/or factually novel or complex.”

LEE, ERICA V. AMAZON

2026 TN WC 7 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 28, 2026

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). To recover medical benefits, Ms. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Billy Ernest Kilburn v. Tennessee Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 14, 2011

A reviewing court may grant relief only when the board or agency has exceeded its jurisdiction or acted illegally, arbitrarily, or fraudulently. Tenn. Code Ann. § 27-8-101; McCallen v. … TDOC Policy No. 502.01(V); Willis v. Tenn. Dep’t of Corr., 113 S.W.3d 706, 713 (Tenn. 2003). In other words, the departure from the UDP must “effectively deny the prisoner a fair hearing.” Jeffries v. Tenn.