Case law

Riedt v. City of McAlester

262 P.2d 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1953

Action upon the petition by the governing board of the municipality constitutes a finding that the petition was signed by the requisite number of property owners, Berry v. … McKnight et al. v. City of Oklahoma City, 165 Okl. 210 , 25 P.2d 638 ; White v. City of Pawhuska, 130 Okl. 156 , 265 P. 1059 .” Baldwin v. City of Lawton, supra [ 198 Okl. 585 , 185 P.2d 701 ].

Schrom Ex Rel. Schrom v. Oklahoma Industrial Development

536 P.2d 904 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1975

In State v. … In Henry v.

Humphrey v. State

633 P.2d 746 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 13, 1981

Humphrey ran out his back door and threw two brown bags over a fence. … To support its argument that the officers were legitimately on the premises at the time the drugs were discovered, the State cites Michigan v.

Delaware County Ex Rel. Carver v. Hogan

33 Okla. 791 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1912

That the same exists is in effect decided in the cases of Wenner v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 25 Okla. 515, 106 Pac. 821 , and Thompson et al. v. State ex rel. Cooksey et al., 25 Okla. 741 , 108 Pac. 398 . … Lee v.

State Ex Rel. Awtrey v. Randolph

139 Okla. 254 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1929

See, also, Shannon et al. v. State, 33 Okla. 293 , 125 Pac. 1106 ; Lacy et al. v. Board of Education, 98 Okla. 237 , 224 Pac. 712 ; Gentis et al. v. Hunt, Trustee, et al., 121 Okla. 71 , 247 Pac. 358 ; Flood v. … of the school board, and J.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2005

See Woodward v. … See Richey Manor, Inc. v. Schweiker, 684 F.2d 130 , 135 (D.C.

McDoulett v. State

685 P.2d 978 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1984

Following the offense, C.F. described her assailant as a white male of medium build with brown curly hair and a scarred, pockmarked face. … Appellant does have brown curly hair and complexion scars, but he is 5'8" tall and usually weighs between 127 and 130 pounds.

Wade, County Superintendent v. Eakin

31 Okla. 640 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

Waiving the issuance of the alternative writ and a rule to show cause (Ellis et al. v. … Ellis et al. v. Armstrong et al., supra.

State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. Frame

200 Okla. 650 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1948

J. 171; Scribner’s Sons v. Marrs (Tex.) 262 S. W. 722 . In Smith v. State Industrial Accident Com. … See, also, Campbell Building Co. v. Road Commission (Utah) 70 P. 2d 857 . In State Board of Barber Examiners v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Pourron

118 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1926

The section in question provides that the township (board shall select from its township road system the ro-aids to be dragged. Them follows the provisidn above quoted. … For support of his position che cases of Lusk v. Starkey, 53 Okla. 794, 158 , Pac. 918, and St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v.

Harley v. McCasland

162 Okla. 117 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1933

Brown. In 1924, Brown assigned this lease to. A. N. Harley, the defendant herein, and Harley thereupon went into possession of the real estate. This lease was to end September 20, 1927. … Lehmer, 22 Okla. 627 , 98 P. 351 , and Hudson v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 2006

State v. Scales , 97 P. 584 , 587 (Okla. 1908). … State v. Scales , 97 P. 584 , 587 (Okla. 1908). 2.

Claxton v. Barrowman

266 P.2d 966 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1954

Co. v. Read, Insurance Com’r, 182 Okl. 103 , 77 P.2d 26 . … See City of Tulsa v.

Dalton v. City of Tulsa

560 P.2d 955 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1977

The rates involved were approved by the' Board. … City of Shawnee v. Taylor, 191 Okl. 687 , 132 P.2d 950 (1943), (in which we held that this Court will not give advisory opinions), and Dablemont v.

Moles v. State of Oklahoma

384 F. Supp. 1148 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1974

Brown v. Crouse, 395 F.2d 755 (C.A. 10 1968); Omo v. Crouse, 395 F.2d 757 (C.A. 10 1968). … Sandoval v. Rodriguez, 461 F.2d 1097 (C.A. 10 1972).

State Ex Rel. West v. Balzer

43 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1914

“(a) An appeal lies from the action of such county superintendent to the board of county commissioners.” In Evinger v. Duke, ante, 130 Pac. 147 , Board of County Commissioners v. Worrell was followed and approved. … Huddleston et al. v. Askey, 56 Ala. 218 ; Duramus v. Harrison, 26 *203 Ala. 326.

Rogers Realty, Inc. v. Smith

74 O.B.A.J. 2475 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 9, 2003

Board. … In Elbadramany v. Stanley, 490 So.2d 964 (Fla.App.1986), the parties were real estate brokers and Realtor members of the Daytona Beach Board of Realtors, Inc.

City of Ardmore v. Sayre

54 Okla. 779 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

The rule laid down in Cameron v. … The case of Stearns, Mayor, v.

Cimmarron Transportation, LLC v. Heavner

186 P.3d 947 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 2008

See, County Board of Equalization v. Frontier Grain, Co., 1969 OK 82 , 454 P.2d 317 . … The assessor asserts that the comparable sales presented by Cimmar-ron were "cherry-picked" by Cimmarron. 113 In County Board of Equalization v.

W.O. Ligon Company v. Town of Chelsea

346 P.2d 178 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1959

Selected Investments Corp. v. … Woods v. Cole, 178 Okl. 567 , 63 P.2d 730 ; Audit Company of New York v. City of Louisville, 6 Cir., 185 F. 349 ; Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. City of Enid, 179 Okl. 283 , 65 P.2d 440 ; City of Pawhuska v.