Case law

Boehmer v. Silvestone

95 Or. 154 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1918

It is settled by the case of Dowell v. … Kendricks for board, etc.................................. 61.90 November, 1914, T. B.

Hodgkin v. Boswell

63 Or. 589 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1912

Marx v. Hanthorn, 148 U. S. 180 (13 Sup. Ct. 508: 37 L. Ed. 410 ) ; Troyer v. Wood, 96 Mo. 478 ( 10 S. W. 42 : 9 Am. St. Rep. 367 ) ; State v. Griffie, 118 Mo. 188 ( 23 S. W. 878 ) ; Robson v. … Thomas, 55 Mo. 581 ; Ducommun v. Hysinger, 14 Ill. 249 ; Brown v. Marqueze & Co., 30 Tex. 77 .

Argonaut Insurance v. Rush

98 Or. App. 730 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 1989

The Board disagreed with the referee’s legal conclusion and found that the evidence supported the claim’s compensability. We do not evaluate the credibility of witnesses. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. … Van Blokland v. Oregon Health Sciences University, 87 Or App 694, 698 , 743 P2d 1136 (1987). Consequently, we affirm the Board’s conclusion that claiihant’s medical services claim is compensable.

SAIF Corp. v. Myers

191 Or. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 2003

Citing our opinion in Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. … Drews v. EBI Companies, 310 Or 134, 142 , 795 P2d 531 (1990).

Compton v. SAIF Corp.

195 Or. App. 329 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 2004

See Cope v. West American Ins. … We review the board’s conclusion as a matter of law, Henderson v. S.D. Deacon Corp., 127 Or App 333, 337 , 874 P2d 76 (1994), and agree that claimant’s injury did not occur in the course of employment.

Peters v. Renfro

43 Or. App. 411 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 1979

Penrod/Brown v. … See Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, supra; Bekins v.

Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.

55 Or. App. 873 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 8, 1982

In SAIF v. … SAIF v.

Roseburg Forest Products v. Langley

156 Or. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 7, 1998

See Mallon v. … Counts v. International Paper Co., 146 Or App 768, 771 [, 934 P2d 526] (1997), Brooks v. D & R Timber, 55 Or App 688, 692 [, 639 P2d 700 ] (1982).

Public Utility Commission v. Tillotson

210 Or. App. 433 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 3, 2007

The board further determined, however, that those separate acts were “connected in subject matter and in proximity.” Citing Perez v. … Steele v.

Harris v. Nordquist

96 Or. App. 19 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 5, 1989

Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695 , 588 P2d 1100 (1978). … Oregonian Publishing Co. v. Board of Parole, 95 Or App 501 , 769 P2d 795 (1989).

Bessler v. Powder River Gold Dredg. Co.

95 Or. 271 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1919

McCormick, 18 Or. 301, 303 ( 22 Pac. 1062 ); Ambrose v. Huntington, 34 Or. 484, 489 ( 56 Pac. 513 ); West v. Edwards, 41 Or. 609, 614 ( 69 Pac. 992 ); Bessler v. … Va. 238 ; Jackson v. Spear, 7 Wend. (N. Y.) 401; Williams v. Snidow, 4 Leigh (Va.), 14 ; Gay v. Moffit, 2 Bibb. (Ky.) 506 ( 5 Am. Dec. 633 ); Keys v. Mason, 44 Tex. 140 ; Pratt v. Caufield, 67 Mo. 50 .

State v. Williams

322 Or. 620 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1996

See also Dowling v. … See, e.g., State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (applying rule). No error apparent on the face of the record is presented here.

VanLeeuwen v. Farm Credit Administration

600 F. Supp. 1161 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 12, 1984

United States v. Sparks, 685 F.2d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.1982). … In Arco Corp. v.

Mesa v. Barker Manufacturing Co.

66 Or. App. 161 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 1983

We held in Forney v. … Employer argues that Woodman v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 289 Or 551 , 614 P2d 1162 (1980), is controlling in the case.

Barrett v. D & H DRYWALL

300 Or. 325 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1985

The Court of Appeals first reversed the Board and then, on reconsideration, affirmed the Board. 70 Or App 123 , 688 P2d 130 (1984), 73 Or App 184 , 698 P2d 498 (1985). … Wheeler v. Boise Cascade, 298 Or 452, 457 , 693 P2d 632 (1984); Weller v. Union Carbide, supra, 288 Or at 29 ; Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.

Jamison v. Cupp

27 Or. App. 109 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 25, 1976

Massachusetts has since overruled the Kite rule, Brown v. Commissioner of Correction, 336 Mass 718, 147 NE2d 782 , 68 ALR2d 708 (1958). … Willis v. Brantley, 6 Ill App 3d 645, 285 NE2d 571 (1972); Stidham v. Sowers, 260 La 200, 255 So 2d 740 (1971); Green v. State, 245 A2d 147 (Me 1968); Brown v.

Teel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

58 Or. App. 564 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 18, 1982

Employer properly concedes that the Board was required to award a reasonable attorney fee, because claimant prevailed on the employer-initiated appeal to the Board on the issue of compensability. … Claimant is entitled to the award of a reasonable attorney fee for his attorney’s representation on the compensation issue, but not on the penalty issue on which the employer prevailed before the Board. See Korter v.

Nix v. Freightliner Corp.

145 Or. App. 560 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 22, 1997

Employer contends that the Board’s decision is compelled by our decision in Volk v. America West Airlines, 135 Or App 565 , 899 P2d 746 (1995), rev den 322 Or 645 (1996). … We review the Board’s decision for errors of law. ORS 183.482(8); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 202 , 752 P2d 312 (1988).

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Central Point

341 Or. 393 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 28, 2006

Fifth Avenue Corp. v. … In Ludwick v.

Transamerica Insurance Group v. Adams

62 Or. App. 419 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 30, 1983

Adams v. … Smith v. Rubel, supra; Security Savings and Trust Co. v.