Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.10s
Goodin v. Commissioners of the Land Office
174 Okla. 364 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1935
In the ease of Board of County Com’rs v. … Board of County Com’rs v. State ex rel. Commissioners of Land Office, supra.
Cited 6 timesPublishedTulsa County v. St. John's Hospital
200 Okla. 176 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1948
In Board of Commissioners v. Sisters of Sorrowful Mother, supra, we said: “It is apparent that property of this, character was not subject to taxation under the laws of the Territory of Oklahoma.” … Hospital v. California Emp. Comm. (Cal.) 151 P. 2d 109 ; Dingwell v. Seymour, 91 Cal. App. 483 , 267 P. 327 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1998
McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297,302 (Okla. 1968) (citation omitted). … Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision v. Migliaccio, 917 P.2d 483 , 486 (Okla.Ct.App. 1996), citing Marley v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 15, 2005
Spearman v. Williams, 415 P.2d 597 , 600 (Okla. 1966) (citations omitted). In Jackson v. … Trapp v. Cook Constr. Co., 105 P. 667 , 669 (Okla. 1909) (emphasis added); see also Oliver v. Okla.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 8, 2003
White v. Wint, 638 P.2d 1109 , 1112-13 (Okla. 1981); Byars v. State, 102 P. 804 , (syllabus ¶ 1) (Okla.Crim. 1909). … Cartwright v.
Cited 0 timesPublished532 P.2d 81 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1975
Stidham v. State, Okl.Cr., 507 P.2d 1312 . … Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 , 92 S.Ct. 1056 , 31 L.Ed.2d 340 . Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 .
Cited 8 timesPublished27 Okla. 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1910
Le Flore v. Sanders, 24 Okla. 301 , 103 Pac. 858 . Prior to the admission of the state, the eastern part thereof, commonly known as the Indian Territory, was without any herd law; and, as was said in Le Flore v. … These sections of the act were considered by this court in Le Flore v.
Cited 2 timesPublished25 Okla. 469 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1910
Moses on Mandamus, c. 26 pp. 222, 225; State v. King et al., 29 Kan. 607 ; State ex rel. v. Board of Supervisors of Mineral Point, 22 Wis. 396 ; Hempstead v. Underhill, 20 Ark. 337; Commonwealth v. Brady, 6 Phila. … (Pa.) 121; State v. Elkinton et al., 30 N. J. Law, 335; Board of Com’rs of Clarke County v. State ex rel. Lewis, 61 Ind. 75 ; Potts v. State ex rel. Ogg, 75 Ind. 336 .
Cited 123 timesPublished25 Okla. 344 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1909
In Paper Co. v. … Co. v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. McKnight
496 P.2d 775 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1972
In Jack v. … . * * In Donaldson v.
Modified on other grounds by Schrom Ex Rel. Schrom v. Oklahoma Industrial Development, 536 P.2d 904 (1975)Cited 13 timesPublished103 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1924
Co. v. Lane, 69 Okla. 145 , 170 Pac. 502 ; Board of Ed. of City of Guthrie v. Excise Board of Logan County, 86 Okla. 24 , 206 Pac. 517 . The act of 1921, chapter 48, sec. 1, Sess. … Board of Ed., City of Guthrie v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedWood v. Independent School District No. 141
661 P.2d 892 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1983
As we noted in Childers v. … See Young v. Board of Pharmacy, *896 81 N.M. 5 , 462 P.2d 139 , 36 ALR3d 1, § 3[a] (New Mexico 1969); 2 Am.Jur.2d Administrative Law § 378.
Cited 33 timesPublishedConsolidated School Dist. No. 2 v. Crowder
111 Okla. 125 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1925
contention, School District v. olvin, 10 Kan. 283 , wherein the Supreme Court of Kansas held that the board and teacher might enter into a contract specifying other conditions which would authorize the removal or discharge … board.”
Cited 1 timesPublished71 Okla. Crim. 136 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1941
Elmer Young v. State, 71 Okla. Cr. 112 , 108 P. 2d 1028 ; Nott v. State, 70 Okla. Cr. 432 , 107 P. 2d 366 ; Barfield v. State, 68 Okla. Cr. 455 , 99 P. 2d 544 ; Matthews v. State, 67 Okla. … Counsel for defendant, in anticipation of the position to be talien by the state in this case, cites the cases of Brown v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 115 , 167 P. 762 ; Price v. State, 1 Okla.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWinter v. Corporation Commission
660 P.2d 145 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1983
National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Brown v. Banking Board, 512 P.2d 166 (Okl.1973); El Paso Natural Gas v. … Association v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Company, 266 P.2d 633 (Okl.1954); Ward v. Corporation Commission, 470 P.2d 993 (Okl.1970). . Roberts v. Roberts, 357 P.2d 980 (Okl.1961); Martin v. Harrah Ind.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWestgate Oil Co. v. Refineries Production Co.
172 Okla. 260 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1935
The application was denied and an appeal was taken to the board of adjustment, which board granted the permit. … In the case of Swindall v.
Cited 23 timesPublished476 P.2d 75 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1970
Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v. Shanbour, Okl., 435 P.2d 569, 573 (1968). … Scaduto v. Town of Bloomfield, 127 N.J.L. 1 , 20 A.2d 649 (1941); Joyce v. Dobson, 255 App.Div. 348 , 8 N.Y.S.2d 768 (1938). Denial of the variance sought is not against the clear weight of the evidence.
Cited 11 timesPublishedJames v. Trustees of Wellston Township
18 Okla. 56 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1907
E. 531 ; Smith v. Board, 131 Ind 116, 30 N. E. 949 ; White v. Board, 129 Ind. 396 , 28 N. E. 846 ; Abbott v. Board, 114 Ind. 61 , 16 N. E. 127 ; Freel v. School City of Crawfords ville, 41 N. E. 312 ; Summers v. … E. 725 ; Board v. Boswell, 4 Ind. App. 133 , 30 N. E. 534 .; Finch v. Board, 3 Ohio, S. 37; Ford v. School Dist. 121 Pa.
Cited 22 timesPublished39 Okla. 18 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1913
See case of Guthrie v. Swan, 3 Okla. 116 , 41 Pac. 84 ; s. c., 6 Okla. 423 , 41 Pac. 84 ; Payne v. McCormick H. M. Co., 11 Okla. 318 , 66 Pac. 287 . As more directly in point see 38 Cyc. 1623-1625. … Webster’s Dictionary; State v. Murphy, 23 Nev. 390 , 48 Pac. 628, 629 .
Cited 6 timesPublished119 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1926
Defendants contend for the negative of these propositions, and in support of the first we are .cited to Brown et al. v. Mayhall, 63 Okla. 268 , 164 Pac. 973 ; Link v. Schlegal, 33 Okla. 458 , 126 Pac. 576 ; Ward v. … Co. v. Hale, 20 Okla. 159 , 94 Pac. 530 ; Kingfisher Imp. Co. v. Board of Co. Com., 60 Okla. 220 , 168 Pac. 824 .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna