Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

1.82s

  • Gagnon's Case

    128 Me. 155 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 7, 1929

    Wyman v. Berry, 106 Me., 43; Wilbur v. Construction Company, 109 Me., 521; Pease v. Gardiner, 113 Me., 264. … Under these circumstances the court concluded that “the finding of the board was not wholly without support.”

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Inhabitants of Jay v. Inhabitants of Carthage

    48 Me. 353 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1860

    Bangor v. … See Lord v. Chadbourne, 42 Maine, 443; Knox v. Waldoboro', 5 Maine, 185.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Barrett v. Lewiston, Brunswick & Bath Street Railway Co.

    104 Me. 479 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 4, 1908

    There was a board that set in the room, some kind of a fixture ; I took it and put it up on the bed and Mr. Barrett signed it and I witnessed it.” … As observed by this court in Valley v. Boston & Maine R. R. Co., 103 Maine, 106.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Crommett v. City of Portland

    150 Me. 217 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 3, 1954

    Riche v. Bar Harbor Water Co., 75 Me. 91 (1883); Ulmer v. Railroad Co., 98 Me. 579 , 57 A. 1001 , 66 L. R. A. 387 (1904); Brown v. Gerald, 100 Me. 351 , 61 A. 785 (1905); Hayford v. … Kennebec Water District v. Waterville, 96 Me. 234, 241 , 52 A. 774, 777 (1902); Ulmer v. Railroad Co., supra; Brown v. Gerald, supra.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Farrington

    139 Me. 241 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 17, 1942

    Moore v. Harrison, 26 Ind. App., 408 , 59 N. E., 1077, 1078 ; Kohl v. Frederick, 115 Iowa, 517 , 88 N. W., 1055 ; and Browne on the Statute of Frauds, Fifth Edition, Sec. 224, on page 296. … Bird v. Munroe, supra; Purdom Naval Stores Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 153 F., 327, 330 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • White v. Monmouth Canning Company

    228 A.2d 795 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 21, 1967

    In Carroll’s Case, 225 Mass. 203 , 114 N.E. 285 , 287, (1916), however, it was held that any report on file with the Industrial Accident Board may be acted upon by the board without formally being put in evidence. … Watkins v. Cavanagh, 61 Idaho 720 , 107 P.2d 155 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Boucher v. State of Maine

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 7, 2016

    CR-14-0627 MICHAEL BOUCHER, Petitioner V. … Rowe v. Cuyler, 534 F. Supp. 297, 301 (E.D. Pa. 1982). 21.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Seppala & Aho-Spear Associates v. Westbrook Gardens

    388 A.2d 88 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 3, 1978

    Audette & Sons, Inc. v. LaRochelle, Me., 373 A.2d 1226, 1228 (1977). … See Board of Directors of Maine School Administrative District No. 75 v. Merrymeeting Educators’ Association, Me., 354 A.2d 169 (1976).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bond v. Town of Windham

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 4, 2016

    BOND, Plaintiff V. … Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. Dworman, 2004 ME 142, <]I 8, 861 A.2d 662.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

    448 A.2d 272 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 6, 1982

    Co. v. New England Tel. & Tel. … In Public Service Co. of New Mexico v.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Harlow v. Agway, Inc.

    327 A.2d 856 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 7, 1974

    Board of Ed. of City of Chicago v. Industrial Com’n, 53 Ill.2d 167, 171 , 290 N.E.2d 247, 250 (1972); see 1A Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 47.10. … Owen v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In re Holbrook

    133 Me. 276 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 4, 1935

    Morrison v. McDonald, 21 Me., 550. It has been by our statutes especially extended to Boards of Registration, State Assessors, Disclosure Commissioners and Department of Public Welfare. … In State v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Theriault v. Magnusson

    698 F. Supp. 369 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 28, 1988

    As stated in Nachtigall v. … Nachtigall v. Board of Charities and Corrections, 590 F.Supp. at 1224 , citing Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817 , 94 S.Ct. 2800 , 41 L.Ed.2d 495 (1974).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Peabody v. Sweet

    129 Me. 375 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 25, 1930

    Peabody, then standing on the running board of her husband’s car. The facts were in dispute. … J., 982; Marble v. Ross, 124 Mass., 44 . Assuming trespass, the unlawful character of that act was not a contributing cause of injury. Motions overruled. Exceptions overruled.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Sweat

    90 Me. 528 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 2, 1897

    Brown v. Heard, 85 Maine, 294; Hobbs v. Payson, 85 Maine, 498 ; and cases cited. … Hathorn v. Hinds, supra.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Rossignol v. Maine Public Employees Retirement System

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 1, 2015

    This Court cannot substitute its judgment for the Board's. See Anderson v. Me. Pub. Emples. Ret. Sys., 2009 ME 134, ~ 28, 985 A.2d 501 (citations omitted). … Rossignol argues that the Board failed to consider the combined effects, which is required under Hale-Rice v. Maine State Retirement Sys., 1997 ME 64, 691 A.2d 232.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Scott Dugas Trucking & Excavating, Inc. v. Homeplace Building & Remodeling, Inc.

    651 A.2d 327 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 15, 1994

    Marxsen v. Board of Dir., M.S.AD. No. 5, 591 A.2d 867, 871-72 (Me.1991) (finding that an appellee is not required to cross appeal in order to raise an alternative ground for affirmance of a judgment). … Inc. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Horton v. Town of Casco

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 16, 2012

    Camp v. Town of Shapleigh, 200S ME 53, 'IT 9, 943 A.2d 595 (quoting McGhie v. Town of Cutler, 2002 ME 62, 9I 5, 793 A.2d 504). … Asso. v. Naples, 486 A.2d 91, 95 (Me. 1984) (requiring the split of an appeal regarding zoning issues to the zoning board and subdivision issues to the Superior Court).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Montgomery v. Eaton Peabody, LLP

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 24, 2015

    Because the 10 I 31 I 05 remand by the Board of Appeals was not a final judgment, no appeal was possible. See Bruesewitz v. Grant, 2007 ME 13, t]I 5, 912 A.2d 1255, 1257; see also Aubry v. … Accordingly, the plaintiffs did not suffer a particularized injury as a result of the decision of the Board. See Witham Family Ltd. P'ship v. Town of Bar Harbor, 2011 ME 104, <n: 7, 30 A.3d 811; Brooks v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Powell v. James Newspaper, Inc.

    400 A.2d 362 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 18, 1979

    Gagnon v. … But see Hall v. Cole, 412 U.S. 1, 5 , 93 S.Ct. 1943 , 36 L.Ed.2d 702, 707 (1973).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.