Case law

United States v. Gregory McFayden

865 F.2d 1306 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 1989

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50-51 , 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2640-41 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). … Finally, the roadblock was “carried out pursuant to a plan embodying explicit, neutral limitations on the conduct of individual officers,” Brown v.

International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Boeing Company, Intervenor

595 F.2d 664 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 8, 1979

The decision of the administrative law judge is appended to that of the Board. Boeing Co., supra note 2, 214 N.L.R.B. at 545. 18 . Id. at 559-560. 19 . NLRB v. … Young’s Super Mkts. v.

Mason v. Claytor

459 F. Supp. 174 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 1978

With regard to Board of Regents v. … Brown, 544 F.2d 279 (6th Cir. 1976) (transfer of teacher from one school to another plus allegations of misconduct insufficient); Harris v.

International Association Of Machinists, Local Lodge No. 311, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

289 F.2d 451 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 1961

And see United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 1960, 362 U.S. 329 , 80 S.Ct. 759 , 4 L.Ed.2d 768 8 Board's brief 9 Penn Oil Co. v. … United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 1960, 362 U.S. 329 , 80 S.Ct. 759 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 768 , reversing N. L. R. B. v.

Institut Pasteur v. Chiron Corp.

315 F. Supp. 2d 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2004

Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, 267 F.Supp.2d 61, 67 (D.D.C.2003). … Brown, 267 F.Supp.2d at 66 -67 (quoting Par-Knit Mills v. Stockbridge Fabrics Co., 636 F.2d 51, 54 (3d Cir.1980)); see also Smith Wilson Co. v. Trading & Dev. Establishment, 744 F.Supp. 14, 16 (D.D.C.1990).

Kien v. United States

749 F. Supp. 286 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 1990

In Mondy v. … In Speiser v.

Allied Industrial Workers, Afl-Cio Local Union No. 289 v. National Labor Relations Board, Cavalier Division of Seeburg Corporation and Cavalier Corporation, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Cavalier Division of Seeburg Corporation and Cavalier Corporation, Cavalier Division of Seeburg Corporation and Cavalier Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

476 F.2d 868 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 1973

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CAVALIER DIVISION OF SEEBURG CORPORATION and Cavalier Corporation, Respondent. CAVALIER DIVISION OF SEEBURG CORPORATION and Cavalier Corporation, Petitioner, v. … Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). 16 Conduct by an employer which discourages a union activity protected by Sec. 7 may also discourage and discriminate against membership in a labor organization.

Blair-Bey v. Quick

151 F.3d 1036 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 24, 1998

The Court expressly left this possibility open in Preiser v. Rodriguez, see 411 U.S. 475, 499 , 93 S.Ct. 1827 , 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973); see also Brown v. … Compare Flemming v. Oregon Board of Parole, 998 F.2d 721 (9th Cir.1993) (Oregon’s parole regulations are “laws” for ex post facto purposes) with Bailey v.

Zhengxing v. Nathanson

215 F. Supp. 2d 114 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2002

Broadcasting Board of Governors, named in his official capacity. … Broadcasting Board of Governors. She seeks monetary damages, including back pay, compensation for emotional distress, and attorney’s fees.

Winder v. Erste

566 F.3d 209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 2009

Lottery Board spoke pursuant to duty to maintain Board’s financial integrity when he reported Board members’ financial misconduct); Wilburn v. Robinson, 480 F.3d 1140, 1151 (D.C. … See, e.g., Reaves-Bey v.

Calderon Lopez v. Unknown Individuals

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2019

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Aside from the passing reference to “Ms. … See, e.g., Nix El v. Williams, 174 F. Supp. 3d 87, 93 (D.D.C. 2016); see also Hickman v. Library of Congress, 74 F. Supp. 3d 329, 331 (D.D.C. 2014); Miller v. Board of Ed. of District of Columbia, 106 F.

Stainback v. Secretary of the Navy

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 2009

Fayson v. … Brown, 449 F.2d 654, 655-56 (9th Cir. 1971) (affirming the district court's voiding of a discharge decision until the denial of "a fair and impartial hearing" by the military review board was cured).

United Western Bank v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. … In Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 721 F.

Hawkins v. United States

606 A.2d 753 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1992

Brown, 519 F.2d 1368 (6th Cir.1975), upon which Hawkins relies. Brown was convicted of aiding and assisting in the escape of a federal prisoner. Id. at 1369 . … Stewart v.

Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co. v. Coe

49 F. Supp. 706 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 1942

Lucke et al. v. Coe, 63 App.D.C. 61 , 69 F.2d 379, 381 , 382 and Gandy v. Marble, 122 U.S. 432, 439 , 7 S.Ct. 1290 , 30 L.Ed. 1223 . … The degree of improvement in efficiency in the abrasive art provided by the novel teaching of Brown and Clarke is strong evidence of patentability. Webster Loom Co. v.

Lockamy v. Truesdale

182 F. Supp. 2d 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 15, 2001

National Labor Relations Board (“the defendant” or “the NLRB”). … See Brown v. General Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976).

Allina Health System v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2024

A hospital may seek judicial review of “any final decision of the Board” by filing suit in federal district court within sixty days of the Board’s determination. Id. § 1395oo(f)(1). … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).  C. Motion to Compel The APA requires the court to “review the whole record” in making its decision. 5 U.S.C

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Kappos

6 F. Supp. 3d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 18, 2013

Williams v. … -Golden Triangle v. Sebelius, 566 F.3d 226, 229 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (citing Brown v. Thompson, 374 F.3d 253, 259 (4th Cir.2004); Piamba Cortes v. American Airlines, Inc., 177 F.3d 1272, 1283 (11th Cir.1999)).

Trapps v. United States

887 A.2d 484 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 2005

Brown v. United States, 881 A.2d 586, 593 (D.C.2005) (quoting Russell v. United States, 698 A.2d 1007, 1012 (D.C.1997)) (other citations and internal quotation marks omitted). … See Selby v.

Janet Howard v. Penny Pritzker

775 F.3d 430 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 2015

Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829 (1976). … Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co., 315 U.S. 561 (1942)), suggests Brown need not be read narrowly.