Case law

Hawkins v. Whayne

198 Okla. 400 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1947

Co., 137 Okla. 186 , 279 P. 319 ; Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okla. 169 , 170 P. 2d 200 ; In re Benson, 178 Okla. 299 , 62 P. 2d 962 ; Welch v. Simmons, 190 Okla. 611 , 126 P. 2d 89 . … In Lyons v. Wallen, supra, and again in Hemsley v.

Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality v. Department of Central Services

180 P.3d 1 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 2007

Comm'n v. … Chicago Police Board, 133 IIl.2d 349, 140 Ill.Dec. 394 , 549 N.E.2d 1266 (1990) (overruled on other grounds); Murray v. Bd. of Review, 287 Ill.App.3d 792 , 178 Ill.Dec. 517 , 604 N.E.2d 1040 (1992); King v.

Choate v. State

204 Okla. 596 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1951

Other charges were made against the doctor in the complaint filed with the Board, but he was exonerated on these charges and his license was revoked solely for the reason that the Board found that the above advertisement … Board of Medical Examiners, supra. The order or finding of the Board of Medical Examiners revoking the defendant’s license is reversed, with directions to set aside the revocation.

Cimmarron Transportation, LLC v. Heavner

186 P.3d 947 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 2008

See, County Board of Equalization v. Frontier Grain, Co., 1969 OK 82 , 454 P.2d 317 . … The assessor asserts that the comparable sales presented by Cimmar-ron were "cherry-picked" by Cimmarron. 113 In County Board of Equalization v.

UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS

539 P.3d 1284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 2023

OSCN Found Document:UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. … VIRGINIA UNDERWOOD, Complainant, v. STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS, Respondent.

Taylor v. Callahan

82 Okla. 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1921

Plaintiffs in error state this is an overlapping lease and void for the reasons stated in the case of Brown v. Van Pelt, 64 Okla. 109 , 166 Pac. 102 ; it being their contention! … Plaintiffs in error attempt to assume that Brown v.

Herd Equipment Co. v. Eagle Township

180 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1937

To the same effect is Board of County Com’rs of Okmulgee County v. Alexander, 171 Okla. 288 , 42 P. (2d) 884 . … Drake, 167 Okla. 510 , 30 P. (2d) 903 ; Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. Morningside Hospital and Training School for Nurses, 175 Okla. 242 , 51 P. (2d) 928 ; Central National Bank of Okmulgee v.

Rasure v. Sparks

75 Okla. 181 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1919

Ewing v. Turner, 2 Okla. 94 , 35 Pac. 951 ; Cameron v. Parker, 2 Okla. 277 , 38 Pac. 14 ; Matney v. King, 20 Okla. 22 , 93 Pac. 737 . … See, also, North v. McMahan, 26 Okla. 502 , 110 Pac. 1115 ; Faulk v. Board of Commissioners, 40 Okla. 705 , 140 Pac. 777 .

Walker v. Lahman

159 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1932

finally rendered against the plaintiff in error, Herbert Walker, who had taken the car and was using it for his own purposes at the time of the accident, and was in the car, which was being driven by a man by the name of Brown … J., CLARK, V. O. J., and HEFNER, OULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. McNEILL, J., disqualified. RILEY, J., absent.

Appeal of Billings Community Elevator, Inc.

510 P.2d 953 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1972

Unlike appeals from a county board of equalization to the district court, those appeals are not tried de novo. In two of the cases, Chapman, County Treasurer, et al. v. … The situation herein is not at all comparable to the situation in County Board of Equalization of Kay County v. Frontier Grain Company (1969), Okl., 454 P.2d 317 .

Comstock v. City of Commerce

100 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1924

Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. et al., 27 Okla. 247 , 111 Pac. 198 ; Bowles v. Neeley, Mayor, et al., 28 Okla. 556 , 115 Pac. 344 ; Diggs v. … Incorporated Town of Ryan et al., 32 Okla. 738 , 124 Pac. 19 ; Haskins & Sells v. Oklahoma City, 36 Okla. 57 , 126 Pac. 204 ; Board of Commissioners of Washita County v. Brett, 32 Okla. 853 , 124 Pac. 57 ; Michael v.

Johnston v. Byars State Bank

141 Okla. 277 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1930

Brown v. Lang, 4 Ala. 50 ; Brown v. Lang, 14 Ala. 719 , and Lang v. Brown et al., 21 Ala. 179 . … In the instant case, the allegations held necessary in Ginn v. Brown, supra, were clearly set forth in the petition.

In Re Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.'s Protest

142 Okla. 242 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1930

It is insisted that the rule announced by this court in Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. … LESTER, V. O. J., and RILEY, J., absent.

Armstrong v. Oslin (In re Oslin)

584 B.R. 363 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 24, 2018

In Brown v. … Brown obtained a consent judgment against Felsen in settlement of a multi-party collection action, and thereafter Felsen filed bankruptcy. 27 In seeking to except the judgment from Felsen's discharge, Brown asserted that

Gragg v. Dudley

143 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1930

In the case of Carr v. Wilson, 9 S. … In the case of People v. Crissey, 91 N.

Town of Chouteau v. Blankenship

194 Okla. 401 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1944

In Salyer v. Jackson, 105 Okla. 212 , 232 P. 412 ; State ex rel. King v. McCurdy, 171 Okla. 445 , 43 P. 2d 124 ; Board of Com’rs of Oklahoma County v. Young, 186 Okla. 182 , 97 P. 2d 6 ; Hillsdale Co. v. … In Board of Com’rs of Oklahoma County v. Young, above, it was said: “County commissioners do not have authority to abandon highways at will.

Tulsa County v. Braswell

766 P.2d 341 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1988

Clark v. First Baptist Church, 570 P.2d 327 (Okla.1977). … Blankenship v.

White v. Infield

122 Okla. 4 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1926

BRANSON, V. O. J. The plaintiff, OhasJ J. White, seeks relief herein by a petition' invoking thé original jurisdidtion of this; court to issue writs of mandamus. He prays, a- writ against the defendants, B. E. … Burrow, as the members of and constituting the county election board of Ellis county.

Hurd v. Freeland

442 P.2d 344 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1966

(emphasis ours) The case of Welch v. … In the Welch v.

DeLafleur v. Independent School District No. 11 of Tulsa County

727 P.2d 1352 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1986

OWEA then presented these facts to the Board, but the Board refused recognition. *1353 Although several, ancillary issues were raised, the Board based its refusal on Maule v. … See: York v. Turpen, 681 P.2d 763 (Okl.1984) and Draper v. State, 621 P.2d 1142 (Okl. 1980).