Case law

School Dist. No. 4 v. Hartong

89 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1918

The law is fundamental and is so decided by this court in the case of Stephens v. … This principle has been followed by numerous decisions of this court, including the case of Hughey v. Smith, 65 Or. 323 ( 133 Pac. 68 ), in which they are all collated and approved.

Travis v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

79 Or. App. 126 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1986

The only section dealing specifically with the offset of overpayments of temporary total disability is ORS 656.268(4). 2 As we stated in Forney v. … See Forney v. Western States Plywood, supra, 66 Or App at 160 . Additionally, there has been no showing that the delay was unreasonable.

Tupper v. Roan

227 Or. App. 391 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 15, 2009

Brown v. … Brown, 206 Or App at 251 .

Christensen v. Marvin

273 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1975

In Lee v. Paulsen, decided this date, we held that the plaintiff teacher could not recover for defamation. … Williams v. School District of Springfield R-12, 447 SW 2d 256 (Mo 1969), quoted illustration 2 and decided for the school district.

Aasum v. Good Samaritan Hospital

395 F. Supp. 363 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 15, 1975

In Jackson v. … Id. 376 F.Supp. at 799 ; Straube v. Larson, Civil No. 74-308 (D.Or.1974). . See also Scott v.

Kociemba v. SAIF Corp.

63 Or. App. 557 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1983

would not be entitled to an award of permanent total disability, because his refusal to undergo recommended medical treatment (amputation of his left leg) was unreasonable. 1 See Clemons v. … The Board stated that, given the history of claimant’s difficulties with his leg, “amputation does not appear an ‘extreme’ medical alternative.” In Clemons v.

SAIF Corporation v. Wheeler

107 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1991

We have interpreted ORS 656.278(1), as it now reads, to abolish the Board’s authority to award permanent disability benefits on its own motion. See State ex rel Borisoff v. Workers’ Comp. … Board, 104 Or App 603, 606 , 802 P2d 98 (1990); Independent Paper Stock v. Wincer, 100 Or App 625, 628 , 788 P2d 466 , rev den 310 Or 195 (1990).

Mathews v. City of La Grande

136 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 1931

the injury: Village of Shelby v. … Rep. 799 ); Shannon v. Tacoma, 41 Wash. 220 ( 83 P. 186 ); Fisher v. Anacortes, 109 Wash. 191 ( 186 P. 271 ).

Trevitts v. Hoffman-Marmolejo

138 Or. App. 455 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 3, 1996

The Board approved the CDA on May 21,1991. … Timberline Equipment v. St. Paul Fire & Mar. Ins., 281 Or 639, 643 , 576 P2d 1244 (1978); Slocum v. Lang, 132 Or App 571, 576 , 889 P2d 379 (1995).

O'LEARY v. Valley View Cutting

107 Or. App. 103 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 1991

The Board concluded that former OAR 438-07-015(2) does not apply until a claimant files a request for a hearing. Chapter 438 contains the Board’s rules of practice and procedure for contested cases. … We defer to the Board’s interpretation of its own rules, so long as the interpretation is not inconsistent with the rules and the statutes. Mershon v.

Dean v. SAIF Corp.

72 Or. App. 16 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 1985

Price v. SAIF, supra, 296 Or at 316 . … See Winters et al v. Grimes et al, 124 Or 214 , 264 P 359 (1928); Jones v. SAIF, supra; Mendenhall v. SAIF, 16 Or App 136 , 517 P2d 706 , rev den (1974); Hammond v.

Jarrett v. Wills

235 Or. 51 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1963

It is now settled that in this state only the legislature can waive immunity, James & Yost v. Board of Higher Edu., supra, 1959, 216 Or 598 , 340 P2d 577 ; Vendrell v. … From Barr v.

In Re Compensation of Wild

237 Or. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 2010

ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(8)(a); SAIF v. … See, e.g., Hamilton v. Hughey, 284 Or 739, 743 , 588 P2d 38 (1978).

Odoms v. Oregon State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 24, 2021

OREGON STATE BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. … See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

Marquam Investment Corp. v. Beers

51 Or. App. 819 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 1981

See, e.g., West v. French, 51 Or App 143 , 625 P2d 144 (1981); Davidson v. Employment Div., 51 Or App 219 , 625 P2d 162 (1981); Brown v. Adult & Family Services Div., 51 Or App 213 , 625 P2d 160 (1981). … See West v. French, 51 Or App 143 , 625 P2d 144 (1981); Brown v. Adult and Family Services, 51 Or App 213, 625 P2d 160 (1981).

Smith v. School District No. 45

63 Or. App. 685 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 1983

That language gives the Board broad discretion in evaluating a probationary teacher’s performance. In Henthorn v. … In Hupp v.

Roseburg Forest Products v. Humbert

212 Or. App. 285 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 25, 2007

Co-Oper. v. Dept. of Rev., 273 Or 539, 550-51 , 542 P2d 900 (1975). … Weyerhaeuser Company v. Miller, 306 Or 1 , 760 P2d 1317 (1988), provides relevant instruction.

Sullivan v. Argonaut Insurance

73 Or. App. 694 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1985

The Board properly reversed that decision, citing Roy McFerran, Jr., 34 Van Natta 621 (1982), aff’d without opinion, McFerran v. SAIF, 60 Or App 786 , 655 P2d 230 (1982). … See Alvarez v. GAB Business Services, Inc., 72 Or App 524 , 696 P2d 1131 (1985); Maarefi v. SAIF, 69 Or App 527, 531 , 686 P2d 1055 (1984).

Koach v. Employment Division

25 Or. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 1976

The board adopted the referee’s decision. … Stevenson v. Morgan, 17 Or App 428, 432-33 , 522 P2d 1204 (1974).

SAIF Corp. v. Drury

202 Or. App. 14 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 2005

SAIF v. Lewis, 335 Or 92 , [ 58 P3d 814 ] (2002).” SAIF then appealed the ALJ’s order to the Workers’ Compensation Board. … ORAP 5.45(1); Clinical Research Institute v. Kemper Ins. Co., 191 Or App 595, 608-09 , 84 P3d 147 (2004).