Case law

Eledge v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

230 N.C. 584 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1949

Brown v. R. R., 204 N.C. 668 , 169 S.E. 419 . … G.S. 97-10; Brown v. R. R., supra ( 204 N.C. 668 ). The case of Sayles v. Loftis, 217 N.C. 674 , 9 S.E. 2d 393 , cited by the plaintiff appellee, is not in point.

Anderson v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections

248 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2016

Liner v. … Steffel v.

Hill v. Elizabeth City

291 F. 194 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 20, 1923

—citing Stein v. Bienville Water Supply Co., 141 U. S. 67 , 11 Sup. Ct. 892, 35 L. Ed. 622 , and Turnpike Co. v. State, 3 Wall. 210 , 18 L. … Justice Brown said: “The case, upon the merits, depends largely upon the power of the city under its charter.

Turner v. Turner

205 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1933

The law in this cause has been settled by this Court in Lentz v. Lentz, 193 N. C., 742 ; S. c., 194 N. C., 673 ; Brown v. Brown, ante, 64. The judgment of the court below is Affirmed.

State Ex Rel. Andrews v. Chateau X, Inc.

296 N.C. 251 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1979

See, e.g., Painter v. Board of *261 Education, 288 N.C. 165 , 217 S.E. 2d 650 (1975); Highway Commission v. Industrial Center, 263 N.C. 230 , 139 S.E. 2d 253 (1964). … Kingsley Books v. Brown, supra.

In Re Jc

205 N.C. App. 301 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2010

Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 522 , 507 S.E.2d 894, 895 (1998) (quoting Shelton v. Morehead Mem'l Hosp., 318 N.C. 76, 81 , 347 S.E.2d 824, 828 (1986)). … (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Sturdivant, 304 N.C. 293, 311 , 283 S.E.2d 719, 731 (1981))).

Chosin Few, Inc. v. Scott

209 F. Supp. 2d 593 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 24, 2002

Chaudhry v. … Browning v. Kramer, 931 F.2d 340, 344 (5th Cir.1991). In other words, those costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees which are the proximate result of an attorney’s misconduct are recoverable.

State v. Adams

90 N.C. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1988

Tried for the first degree murder of Rufus Edward Brown, Jr., defendant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. … State v. Corn, 307 N.C. 79, 85 , 296 S.E. 2d 261, 266 (1982). No error. Chief Judge Hedrick and Judge Eagles concur.

Bailey v. McPherson

233 N.C. 231 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1951

In Propst v. … In Fountain v. Pitt County, supra, the summons was against "The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pitt." Service was made on the individual commissioners.

Cabarrus Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 2020

Wilson; and Allison Brown Schafer for North Carolina School Boards Association, amicus curiae. ERVIN, Justice. … V.

State v. Tarantino

322 N.C. 386 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1988

Boarded windows and nailed doors prohibited observation of the inside from all but the most rigorous scrutiny. … State v. Frizzelle, 243 N.C. 49, 51 , 89 S.E.2d 725, 726 (1955) (applying State common law); State v. Browning, 28 N.C.App. 376, 379 , 221 S.E. 2d 375, 377 (1976) (same).

Allan S. Meade & Associates, Inc. v. McGarry

68 N.C. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1984

Durham v. Creech, 32 N.C. App. 55 , 231 S.E. 2d 163 (1977). As a general rule, of course, it is presumed that an instrument is correct as written and executed. Hice v. … We find the statements of this Court, in Construction Co. v. Anderson, 5 N.C.

Mullis v. Sechrest

126 N.C. App. 91 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 1997

Therefore, under a strict construction of G.S. 115C-42, the Board has not waived immunity by purchasing a contract of insurance. See Hallman v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Education, 124 N.C. … Lyles v. City of Charlotte, 344 N.C. 676, 681 , 477 S.E.2d 150, 153 (1996). Local boards of education are not eligible to participate in risk pools. Id. at 680 , 477 S.E.2d at 153. III.

Moore v. Rhodes

190 N.C. App. 822 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 2008

METTIE MOORE, Plaintiff, v. JIMMIE RHODES AND ELIJAH BROWN Defendants. No. COA07-1394 North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed June 3, 2008 This case not for publication The Firm of Erma L. … See Bowlin v. Duke Univ., 108 N.C.

In re Johnson

371 N.C. 53 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 11, 2018

Lanier v. Vines, 274 N.C. 486, 497, 164 S.E.2d 161, 168 (1968)). … The legislature also has authorized the Board to undertake disciplinary action in response to a “[v]iolation of any rule of professional ethics and professional conduct adopted by the Board.” Id. § 93-12(9)(e).

DeVine v. Dave Steel Co.

227 N.C. 684 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1947

Rewis v. Ins. Co., 226 N. C., 325 , 38 S. E. (2d), 97 ; Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N. C., 766 , 32 S. E. (2d), 320 . … Kearns v. Furniture Co., 222 N. C., 438 , 23 S. E. (2d), 310 . *686 Tbe cases of Rewis and Brown , above cited, are in full support of tbe conclusion bere reached.

Snyder v. Freeman

300 N.C. 204 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1980

Section 3(b) of the agreement provides that upon its consummation plaintiff “shall resign from the Board of Directors of General Aviation and [defendants Freeman and Groom] shall elect to the board to fill her vacancy Mr. … Walker v. Brown, 28 Ill. 378 , 81 Am. Dec. 287 ; Massachusetts General Hospital v. Fairbanks, 129 Mass. 78 , 37 Am. Rep. 303 ; Sullivan v. Detroit, Y. & A.A. R. Co., 135 Mich. 661 , 98 N.W. 756 , 64 L.R.A. 673 , 106 Am.

State v. Morgan

60 N.C. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1983

In Giglio v. … In Campbell v.

Farr v. Bd. of Adjustment of Rocky Mount

318 N.C. 493 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1986

The respondent Board argues that two sections of the ordinance are applicable. The Board first points to Section VILA, Note 2, which provides that: “An accessory use in a . . . … The Board has also argued that Mrs.

Holliday v. Long Manufacturing Co.

146 F. Supp. 527 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 30, 1956

Co. v. … Harrington, and Jim Brown Hollidáy will be enjoined from committing further acts of infringement of Long’s patent No. 2,704,-156.