Opinion

Turner v. Turner

  • 205 N.C. 198
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Sep 20, 1933
Status
Published
Author
Orbiam
On the bench
Orbiam
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 90.4%

The opinion

Pee OrBiAM.

The only question involved in this appeal is whether or not the court below was in error in sustaining defendant’s demurrer. ~Wq think not.

C. S., 511: “The defendant may demur to the complaint when it appears upon the face thereof, either that: (2) the plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue; . . . or (6) the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” The rights of plaintiff are remitted to the judgment before mentioned, which plaintiff and defendant heretofore entered into before Judge Stack. She was sui juris and no mistake or fraud alleged.

The law in this cause has been settled by this Court in Lentz v. Lentz, 193 N. C., 742 ; S. c., 194 N. C., 673 ; Brown v. Brown, ante, 64. The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.