Case law

Turlington v. Summers

162 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1933

In the case of Madrid v. Sandoval, 13 P. (2d) 877 , the Supreme Court of New Mexico on this question says: “The governing rules are well stated by Mr. Justice Brewer in Hudson v. … the statute, and that while in such custody they have not been so exposed to the reach of unauthorized persons as to afford a reasonable probability of their having been changed or tampered with,’ * * * “As said in Hannah v.

Jones v. Seawell

13 Okla. 711 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1904

$212.50, with the secretary of the board. … The case of Smith et al. v.

Herd Equipment Co. v. Eagle Township

180 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1937

To the same effect is Board of County Com’rs of Okmulgee County v. Alexander, 171 Okla. 288 , 42 P. (2d) 884 . … Drake, 167 Okla. 510 , 30 P. (2d) 903 ; Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. Morningside Hospital and Training School for Nurses, 175 Okla. 242 , 51 P. (2d) 928 ; Central National Bank of Okmulgee v.

Riedt v. City of McAlester

262 P.2d 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1953

Action upon the petition by the governing board of the municipality constitutes a finding that the petition was signed by the requisite number of property owners, Berry v. … McKnight et al. v. City of Oklahoma City, 165 Okl. 210 , 25 P.2d 638 ; White v. City of Pawhuska, 130 Okl. 156 , 265 P. 1059 .” Baldwin v. City of Lawton, supra [ 198 Okl. 585 , 185 P.2d 701 ].

Baker v. Hammett

23 Okla. 480 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1909

On this subject in a case in which very full consideration is *486 given to it — Taylor v. Brown, 5 Dak. 335, 349 , 40 N. … Board of Commissioners of Garfield County v. Porter et al., 19 Okla. 173 , 92 Pac. 152 ; Lee v. United States, 7 Okla. 558 , 54 Pac. 792 ; Kellogg v.

Romero v. City of Miami

8 F. Supp. 3d 1321 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 20, 2014

Barney v. Pulsipher, 143 F.3d 1299, 1307 (10th Cir.1998) (quoting Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)). … Stat. tit. 40, § 552 (“ ‘Public employer’ means the State of Oklahoma or any political subdivision thereof, including any department, agency, board, commission, institution, authority, public trust, municipality, county,

City of Ardmore v. Sayre

54 Okla. 779 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

The rule laid down in Cameron v. … The case of Stearns, Mayor, v.

Allen v. State

557 P.2d 1158 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1976

In Yarbrough v. … In Rutherford v.

Opinion No. (2004)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 2004

City of Sand Springs v. Dep't of Pub. … v.

Comstock v. City of Commerce

100 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1924

Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. et al., 27 Okla. 247 , 111 Pac. 198 ; Bowles v. Neeley, Mayor, et al., 28 Okla. 556 , 115 Pac. 344 ; Diggs v. … Incorporated Town of Ryan et al., 32 Okla. 738 , 124 Pac. 19 ; Haskins & Sells v. Oklahoma City, 36 Okla. 57 , 126 Pac. 204 ; Board of Commissioners of Washita County v. Brett, 32 Okla. 853 , 124 Pac. 57 ; Michael v.

Hayes v. Oklahoma City

187 Okla. 490 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1940

McKee v. Bowlin, 184 Okla. 486 , 87 P. 2d 1079 , and other cases. … WELCH, V. C. J., and OSBORN, GIBSON, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2005

See Woodward v. … See Richey Manor, Inc. v. Schweiker, 684 F.2d 130 , 135 (D.C.

Moss v. Hunt

40 Okla. 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1913

Stemper v. Higgins, 38 Minn. 222 , 37 N. W. 95 ; Kingrey v. Berry, 94 Ill. 515 ; Merritt v. Hinton, 55 Ark. 12 , 17 S. W. 270 ; Albert v. Twohig, 35 Neb. 563 , 53 N. W. 582 ; Murphy v. Battle, 155 Ill. 182 , 40 N. … Justice Brewer, in Hudson v.

Hawkins v. Whayne

198 Okla. 400 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1947

Co., 137 Okla. 186 , 279 P. 319 ; Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okla. 169 , 170 P. 2d 200 ; In re Benson, 178 Okla. 299 , 62 P. 2d 962 ; Welch v. Simmons, 190 Okla. 611 , 126 P. 2d 89 . … In Lyons v. Wallen, supra, and again in Hemsley v.

Melvin v. Dunn

607 P.2d 694 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1980

The Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma issued a writ of mandamus in Poulos v. … Tulsa Classroom Teachers Assn., Inc. v.

Hurd v. Freeland

442 P.2d 344 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1966

(emphasis ours) The case of Welch v. … In the Welch v.

Choate v. State

204 Okla. 596 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1951

Other charges were made against the doctor in the complaint filed with the Board, but he was exonerated on these charges and his license was revoked solely for the reason that the Board found that the above advertisement … Board of Medical Examiners, supra. The order or finding of the Board of Medical Examiners revoking the defendant’s license is reversed, with directions to set aside the revocation.

Cimmarron Transportation, LLC v. Heavner

186 P.3d 947 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 2008

See, County Board of Equalization v. Frontier Grain, Co., 1969 OK 82 , 454 P.2d 317 . … The assessor asserts that the comparable sales presented by Cimmar-ron were "cherry-picked" by Cimmarron. 113 In County Board of Equalization v.

Gragg v. Dudley

143 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1930

In the case of Carr v. Wilson, 9 S. … In the case of People v. Crissey, 91 N.

UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS

539 P.3d 1284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 2023

OSCN Found Document:UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. … VIRGINIA UNDERWOOD, Complainant, v. STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS, Respondent.