Case law

Goodner v. Ford

600 S.W.2d 681 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1980

Respondents contend that the declaration within Karzin v. Collett is dictum. … (a) Respondent board called a meeting at which appellant was discharged without notice. (b) Appellant received no severance pay or vacation allowance.

In re Heffron

179 Mo. App. 639 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1913

[See Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Saxey, 131 Mo. 212 , 32 S. W. 1106 .] … board to do picket duty on the 7th day of October, 1913, in front of plaintiff’s place of business at the southeast corner of Sixth and St.

Hoelmer v. Heiskell

359 Mo. 236 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1949

Brown v. Hughes, 345 Mo. 958 , 137 S.W.2d 544 ; Brown v. Wilson, 348 Mo. 658 , 155 S.W.2d 176 . … Brown v. Hughes, supra; Brown v. Wilson, supra.

State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. Caulfield

333 Mo. 270 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 24, 1933

McCune v. Carter, 279 Mo. 304 , 214 S. W. 180 ; State ex rel. Heimburger v. Wells, 210 Mo. 601 , 109 S. W. 758 ; Ward v. Board of Equalization, 135 Mo. 309 , 36 S. W. 648 ; State ex rel. Harrah v. Cauthorn, 40 Mo. … In Thaw v. Ritchie (D.

Koffman v. Southwest Missouri Electric Railway Co.

95 Mo. App. 459 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1902

Instead of that agreement, the one signed merely bound the company to pay his expenses, doctor and board bills until he was able to go home and to furnish him transportation to his home. … Ed.), p. 409, et seq; Browne on Parol Evidence, sec. 43, and *476 cases cited; Kilmer v. Smith, 77 N. Y. 266 ; Dameron v. Jamison, 4 Mo. App. (St. L.) 299.

Bray v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

310 S.W.2d 822 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1958

Thus, there is and can be no conflict in that case and Brown v. Weare and the cases following it. … Brown v. Weare, supra; State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Jacob, supra; State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Jacob, 362 Mo. 781 , 244 S.W.2d 7 ; University City v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.

Schnurbusch ex rel. Frye v. Bohnert

395 S.W.2d 460 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1965

Brown, trustee under such deed of trust. … The County Board of Equalization reduced the assessed valuation to $1,800 in July, 1954.

Grossoehme v. Cordell

904 S.W.2d 392 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1995

Shepard v. State, 549 S.W.2d 550 (Mo.App.1977). Moreover, criminal defendants normally sign agreements with the Board of Probation and Parole in which they promise to keep the terms of probation. … Brown & Co., 808 S.W.2d 950, 955 (Mo.App.1991).

State v. Goodale

210 Mo. 275 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 17, 1908

[State v. Mallon, 75 Mo. 355 ; Owens v. State, 35 Tex. Crim. 345 ; Bishop’s New Crim. Proc., sec. 453; Porath v. State, 90 Wis. 527 ; Wiggins v. State, 84 S. W. 821 ; State v. Houx, 109 Mo. 654 .] … In State v.

State Ex Rel. Reed v. Harris

348 Mo. 426 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 14, 1941

Root having been improperly joined as a respondent in this proceeding (State ex rel. v. Duncan, 333 Mo. 673 , 63 S. W. (2d) 135 ; State ex rel. v. Bader, 336 Mo. 259 , 78 S. W. (2d) 835 ; State ex rel. v. … W. 85; State ex rel. v. Sevier (Mo.), 92 S.

Bonsack & Pearce, Inc. v. School District

226 Mo. App. 1238 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1932

[Montgomery v. Claybrook, 213 Ky. 493 , 281 S.W. 469 ; Ray v. Armstrong, 131 S.W. l.c. 1049, and cases cited; Springfield v. Haydon, 288 S.W. 337 , 341; State ex rel. Young v. … [Edwards v. City of Kirkwood, 147 Mo. App. 599 , 615; Simpson v. Stoddard County, 173 Mo. 421 ; Cole County v. Trust Co., 257 S.W. 774 , 779.]

State v. Burnett

955 S.W.2d 785 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1997

State v. Shinn, 921 S.W.2d 70, 72 (Mo.App. E.D.1996); State v. Brown, 683 S.W.2d 301, 303 (Mo.App.1984). … Defendant’s reliance on Brown is misplaced. In Brown , the defendant’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance, dex-troamphetamine, was reversed. Brown, 683 S.W.2d at 302-03 .

Joshua Lasley v. St. Louis County

Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 2025

Co. v. Messina, 331 S.W.3d 662, 664 (Mo. banc 2011) (citations omitted). … See Boles v. City of St. Louis, 690 S.W.3d 592, 600 (Mo. App. E.D. 2024); Associated Elec. Co-op., Inc. v. City of Springfield, 793 S.W.2d 517, 523 (Mo. App.

Beave v. St. Louis Transit Co.

212 Mo. 331 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 19, 1908

Brown? A. He wasn’t under my care. He was under the care of Dr. Brown, and Dr. Brown consulted me concerning the case. “Q. … [Feary v. Railroad, 162 Mo. 75, 96 ; Ely v. Railroad, 77 Mo. 34, 36 .] In the case of Roscoe v.

Cozad v. Elam

115 Mo. App. 136 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1905

[Devore v. Devore, 138 Mo. 181 , 39 S. W. 68 ; Brown on Stat. of Frauds (5 Ed.), 1895, sec. 118.] … [Abbott v. Draper, 4 Den. (N. Y.) 51; Smith v. Smith, 28 N. J. L. 208; Coughlin v. Knowles, 7 Met. (Mass.) 57; Collier v. Coates, 17 Barb. (N. Y.) 417; Galway v. Shields, 66 Mo. 313 ; Browning v.

Town of Canton v. McDaniel

91 Mo. App. 626 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 1902

State v. Raymond, 156 Mo. 117 ; Kirkwood v. Meramec Highlands Co., 160 Mo. 111 . … State ex rel. v. Court of Appeals, 97 Mo. 276 . In this view of tbe case, tbe Supreme Court is tbe proper tribunal to adjudicate tbe Federal question so raised on tbe record.

Crouppen v. Crouppen

213 S.W.3d 177 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 2007

Brooks v. Brooks, 98 S.W.3d 530, 531 (Mo. banc 2003). … In Kleinfeld v. Graneto Datsun, Inc., 686 S.W.2d 885 (Mo.App.

State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Dirckx

321 Mo. 345 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1928

Bank v. Schlotzhauer, 298 S. W. 732 .] As the order of the Cole County Board of Equalization is void it is the duty of respondent to so adjust the tax books that they will conform to the order of the State Board. … And the performance of that duty may be compelled through the institution of a proceeding of this kind by the State Board. [State ex rel. v. Bethards, 320 Mo. 1164 , 9 S. W. (2d) 603 .] Peremptory writ awarded.

Spencer v. Zobrist

323 S.W.3d 391 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2010

In reviewing the Board’s decision, we must consider the entire record and not simply the evidence that supports the Board’s decision. Coffer v. Wasson-Hunt, 281 S.W.3d 308, 310 (Mo. banc 2009). … We, however, do not defer to the Board’s decision on questions of law. Vivona v. Zobrist, 290 S.W.3d 167, 171 (Mo.App.2009).

State v. Johnson

539 S.W.2d 668 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1976

Bruner described the robber as a “Negro male, 20 to 25 years of age, five ten, 180, in a medium build, light complected and gentleman was wearing a brown hat of some type and a light brown [leather] coat.” … State v. Payne, 452 S.W.2d 805 (Mo.1970); State v. Churchill, 299 S.W.2d 475 (Mo.1957); State v. Hawkins, 418 S.W.2d 921 (Mo. banc 1967); State v.