Case law

Fitzgerald v. Cleland

498 F. Supp. 341 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 30, 1980

Roberts v. Cameron-Brown Co., 556 F.2d 356, 359 (5 Cir. 1977); Northrip v. FNMA, 527 F.2d 23, 26-30 (6 Cir. 1975); Barrera v. Security Building & Investment Corp., 519 F.2d 1166, 1169-74 (5 Cir. 1975); Bryant v. … Warren v. GNMA, 611 F.2d 1229, 1234-35 (8 Cir. 1980); Roberts v. Cameron-Brown Co., supra, 556 F.2d at 359 .

State v. Haag

48 A.3d 207 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 2012

State v. … State v.

Inhabitants of Milford v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.

106 Me. 316 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1909

In Hone v. … In the leading case of Hadley v.

Fissmer v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 21, 2016

The Board's conclusion as to what facts meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance are afforded great deference and "will only be overturned if it is not adequately supported by evidence in the record." Jordan v. … City of Ellsworth, 2003 ME 82, 'lI 8, 828 A.2d 768; See Herrick v. Town ofMechanic Falls, 673 A.2d 1348, 1349 (1996); Rudolph v.

Glidden v. Rines

124 Me. 286 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 9, 1925

Baker v. Cauthorn, 23 Indiana Appeals, 611; 77 A. S. R., 443; Calloway v. Doe, 1 Blackf., 371 ; Lucas v. Tucker, 17 Ind., 41 . … Vroom v. Van Horne, 10 Paige, 549 , (N. Y.); 42 Am. Dec., 94 ; Mount v. Brown, 33 Miss., 566 ; 69 Am. Dec., 362 ; Boyd v. Blankham, 29 Cal., 19 ; 87 Am. Dec., 146 .

King v. Central Maine Medical Center

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 28, 2016

Strong v. Bausman, 2015 Me. Super. LEXIS 110, at *6 (May 5, 2015), aff'd, Strong v. Brakeley, 2016 ME 60, 137 A.3d 1007. … See Efstathiou v.

Jalbert v. Maine Public Employees Retirment System

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 16, 2015

Petitioner then contends that the Board's reliance on the Medical Board's interpretation of the evidence flies in the face of common sense and does not support the Board's finding. (citing Kelley v. … These medical board memoranda exist "to inform the executive director and Board as to the medical board's view on the existence of a disability that would entitle an applicant to benefits." Kelley v. Me. Pub. Emps.

Peaks v. Mayhew

94 Me. 571 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 30, 1901

Enc. of Law, (2 ed.) p. 888, and authorities cited; 1 Bishop on Mar. and Divorce, § 570; Benjamin v. Dockham, 132 Mass. 181 ; Brown v. Mudgett, 40 Vt. 68 ; Thorne v. Kathan, 51 Vt. 520 ; Walker v. … In Thorne v.

State v. Boston & Maine Railroad

80 Me. 430 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 19, 1888

A few cases like or nearly like the present case are the following : Robinson v. N. Y. Cen. R. R. 66 N. Y. 11 ; Masterson v. N. Y. Cen. R. R. 84 N. Y. 247 ; Cuddy v. Horn, 46 Mich. 596 ; Transfer Co. v. … Brown v. E. & N. A. Ry. Co. 58 Maine, 384; Leslie v. Lewiston, 62 Maine, 468.

Bell v. Town of Gray

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 7, 2015

See Larrivee v. Timmons, 549 A.2d 744, 747 (Me. 1988). … Indeed, a Board's conclusion as to whether a particular proposed use falls within a definition will be accorded "substantial deference." Rudolph v.

Larrabee's Case

120 Me. 242 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 19, 1921

Reck v. Whittlesberger, supra; Kinney v. Cadillac Motor Car Co., supra. … Roosa v. Boston Loan Co., 132 Mass., 439 ; Com. v. Sinclair, 195 Mass., 100 , 108-109 Reck v. Whittlesberger, supra; Kinney v. Cadillac Motor Car Co., supra; C. & A. R. R. v.

Central Maine Power Co. v. Waterville Urban Renewal Authority

281 A.2d 233 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 9, 1971

See, Burke v. Board of Representatives of Stamford, 1961, 148 Conn. 33 , 166 A.2d 849 ; 62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations § 160; 37 Am.Jur., Municipal Corporations, § 52. … See, Boston Edison Company v. Board of Selectmen of Concord, supra.

Traip v. Gould

15 Me. 82 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1838

Burbanlc, a house lot on the Kendus-keag river in Bangor, on which was a house frame partly boarded. That in three days after Gould purchased and took his deed of the lot, he conveyed it to George C. … This was fully communicated in the case Reed v. Noble, and others pending in the county of Cumberland, to which we refer. We overrule the demurrer.

In Re Larsen

190 B.R. 713 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Jan 4, 1996

Anderson v. … Brown Co.’s Objection to Exemption, Court Doc. No. 21. 21 . See supra n. 20.

Leland v. Wescott

260 F. 343 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 30, 1919

In Bradstreet v. … Nichols v. Patten, 18 Me. 231 , 35 Am.

Dubail v. Department of Transportation

1998 Me. 126 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 28, 1998

See Petillo v. … See Lynch v.

Anastos v. Town of Brunswick

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 7, 2010

E.g., JOllllSOl1 v. McNeil, 2002 ME 99, <]I 8, 800 A.2d 702, 704. A contested fact is "material" if it could potentially affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law. Inkel v. … Co. v. Ulliv. of Maille, 555 A.2d 470,471 (Me. 1989).

Bernstein v. Martin

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 20, 2000

Defendants moved to strike Brown’s affidavit on several bases. … (Paragraph 16) In Chrysler Credit Corp. v.

In Re David H.

985 A.2d 490 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 29, 2009

Whitten, 667 A.2d 849, 850-51 (Me.1995) (victim claims loss of memory); see also, e.g., People v. Brown, 33 Cal.4th 892 , 16 Cal.Rptr.3d 447 , 94 P.3d 574 (2004); State v. … L.J. 953 , 956-60 (2000); see also Fowler v. State, 829 N.E.2d 459 (Ind.2005); Brown, 94 P.3d 574 . 9 .

Blount v. Redmond

649 F. Supp. 319 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 22, 1986

In Hicks v. … See, e.g., People v.