Case law

People v. Brown

49 Cal. 2d 577 · California Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1958

Thrasher v. … Brown to be played before you, but the denial of that permission was raised by an objection which the defendant made.

Smith v. Brown

3 Binn. 201 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1810

The rule of this court has been, since the case of Millar v. Hall, to discharge on common bail, unless the state,-under which the discharge was given, refuses to extend the same courtesy to the citizens of this state.

State v. Brown

291 S.W.2d 615 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1956

Defendant Thomas Jesse Brown was charged, jointly with one Carl Benton Drake, with burglary in the second degree. Section 560.070 RSMo 1949,' V.A.M.S. … State v. Evans, 161 Mo. 95 , 61 S.W. 590 ; State v. Nolan, 354 Mo. 980 , 192 S.W. 2d 1016 ; State v. Johnson, 362 Mo. 833 , 245 S.W.2d 43 .

Sayer v. Brown

119 Ga. 539 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 16, 1904

Jones v. Oemler, 110 Ga. 202 ; Savannah Railway Co. v. Hardin, Ib. 437-8; Laffitte v. Burke, 113 Ga. 1000 . 4. … Const. § 134; Fullerton v. Spring, 3 Wis. 667 ; Laude v. Chicago Ry. Co., 33 Ib. 640; Glentz v. State, 38 Ib. 549; Scheftels v. Tabert, 46 Ib. 439; Middleton v. New Jersey R. Co., 26 N. J. Eq. 269; Merkle v.

Brown v. Fullenweider

7 S.W.3d 333 · Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · Dec 30, 1999

Brown relies on the case of R.H. v. State, 905 S.W.2d 726, 729 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1995, no writ). In R. … Brown relies upon the case of Beach v. Beach, 912 S.W.2d at 345 . We find that case to be distinguishable.

Osgood v. Brown

1 Free. Ch. 392 · Mississippi Chancery Courts · Jul 1, 1844

Rochelle v. Campbell and Chambers, 1 McChord’s Ch. Rep. 53. In the case of the Bank of Orange County v. … See Underhill v. Van Courtlandt, 2 John. Ch. Rep. 339; Cable v. Martin, 1 How. Rep. 558 .

Toscano v. United States

107 Fed. Cl. 179 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2012

See Caldwell v. … See Stern v. Metro.

Brown v. Gilman

13 Mass. 158 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1816

People v. Brown

66 A.D.2d 223 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 8, 1979

Dennis, 537 SW2d 652 [Mo]; Lillard v State, 528 SW2d 207 [Tenn]; Mikell v State, 242 Ala 298), and in our view the criminal transaction here, as outlined above, requires a similar conclusion. … Tanner, 30 NY2d 102 [robbery and murder]; People v McMillan, 61 AD2d 800 [burglary and rape]).

State v. Brown

633 So. 2d 1059 · Supreme Court of Florida · Mar 17, 1994

633 So.2d 1059 (1994) STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Kevin Bernard BROWN, Respondent. No. 82002. Supreme Court of Florida. March 17, 1994. *1060 Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, Asst. … We have for review Brown v.

King v. Brown

115 So. 2d 405 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1959

115 So.2d 405 (1959) Willie KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard E. BROWN, Administrator of the Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor, State of Louisiana, and H. & W. … As pointed out in Burge v.

Russell v. Brown

41 Ill. 183 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1866

This brings the case fully within that of Banks v. Banks, 31 Ill. 164 . … The description here is of the same character as that which was held good in Choteau v. Jones, 11 Ill. 300 ; See also Benedict v. Dillehunt, 3 Scam. 287 .

Brown v. State

870 S.W.2d 53 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 1994

Brown v. State, 831 S.W.2d 847 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992). … Brown, 881 S.W.2d at 850-51. Appellant cites Pugh v. State, 376 S.W.2d 760 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), as support for his argument that the re-read testimony was excessive.

Brown v. Shriver (In Re Brown)

39 B.R. 820 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 3, 1984

Brown (“Brown”), drove his car into Seat’s home causing approximately $1,500 in damage. Brown was criminally charged with driving under the influence. … Seat will be enjoined from receiving restitution from Brown. 19 An appropriate order will be entered. 1 . See Whitaker v. Lockert, 16 B.R. 917 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Tenn.1982); Holder v.

Brown v. Fleming

212 S.W. 483 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 28, 1919

Brown, in his capacity as administrator of the estate of C. R. … In Johnson v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

467 Pa. 512 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1976

Brown’s counsel requested neither a mistrial nor curative instructions and the Commonwealth’s summation continued. Under the circumstances, the issue is waived. Commonwealth v. … Glenn, 459 Pa, 662, 330 A.2d 535 *518 (1974); Rule 1118 of Pa.R.Crim.P. 5 Here, as in Glenn , Brown has been granted all that he had requested. See also Commonwealth v.

Hibbs v. . Brown

190 N.Y. 167 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1907

Platt v. … Comm . v.

Brown v. Brown

1 Pa. D. & C. 173 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · Jul 2, 1921

In Liem v. … In Kuhn v. Kuhn. 65 Pitts. L.

Brown v. Hazlehurst

54 Md. 26 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 2, 1880

Hawley v. Brown

1 Root 494 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jan 15, 1793