Case law

Wychgel v. States Steamship Co.

135 Or. 475 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1930

Co. v. … Co. v. Johnson, (C. C. A.) 289 Fed 964.

Dial Temporary Help Service, Inc. v. DLF International Seeds, Inc.

255 Or. App. 609 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 2013

Brown v. American Property Management, 167 Or App 53, 61 , 1 P3d 1051 (2000). He contends that we are bound by that principle and that, accordingly, we erred in affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. … Thus, in Madson v.

Wells v. Wood

125 Or. 38 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1927

Paul Trust Co. v. Strong , 85 Minn. 1 ( 88 N.W. 256 ); Baker v. Springfield Western Missouri Ry. Co. , 86 Mo. 75 ; Irwin v. Sample , 213 Ill. 160 , 168 , 169 ( 72 N.E. 687 ); Luff v. Lord , 34 Beav. 220, 226 (56 Eng. … McBRIDE, BROWN and BELT, JJ., concurring.

Wilson v. State Accident Insurance Fund

48 Or. App. 993 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 27, 1980

In Horn v. Timber Products, Inc., 12 Or App 365 , 504 P2d 1059 (1973), claimant had received a permanent disability award which was paid in monthly installments. … We reaffirmed the Horn approach in Taylor v. SAIF, 40 Or 437 , 440, 595 P2d 515 (1979), a case which involved a similar factual issue.

Miller v. School District No. 1

106 Or. 108 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1922

Sacramento v. Bird, 15 Cal. 294 ; State v. Conkling, 19 Cal. 501 .” Roche v. Mayor, etc., 40 N. J. L. 257, 262. The decisions of our own court are in accord with the above principles: State v. … For the purposes of construction the title of a statute may be considered: Torreyson v. State Board of Examiners, 7 Nev. 19, 22.

State v. Lee Chue

130 Or. 99 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 8, 1929

The board functions as a state board, and the members of it are state officers; and we take judicial notice, not only of the existence of such board, but of the accession to office and the duration of the term of each of … Patterson: Butts v. Purdy, 63 Or. 150, 164 ( 125 Pac. 313 ). *105 Counsel for defendant cite United States v. Williams, 5 Cranch C. C. 62, 28 Fed. Cas. (No. 16,713) 660, but that case is not in point here.

The George W. Elder

159 F. 1009 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 21, 1908

The principle involved is supported by David v. … The Oregon Supreme Court seems to have settled the question otherwise (David v. Water Committee, supra; State v. George, 22 Or. 142 , 29 Pac. 356 , 16 L. R. A. 737, 29 Am. St. Rep. 586 ; Eddy v.

Peterson v. State Compensation Department

2 Or. App. 412 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 16, 1970

At this point, claimant’s attorney requested the board to allow an attorney fee, but the board refused. … In Printz v. Compensation Department, 253 Or 148 , 453 P2d 665 (1969), the State Compensation Department rejected a widow’s claim for benefits. Pursuant to her request a hearing was held before a hearing officer.

Boeing Aircraft Co. v. Roy

112 Or. App. 10 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 1992

It relies on Weyerhaeuser Co. v. … It argues that that proof is required under Johnsen v.

State v. Coleman

167 Or. App. 86 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 3, 2000

State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 277 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986). That per se rule has come to be known as the “automobile exception.” … In the years following Brown and Kock , this court further refined the automobile exception analysis in State v. Cromwell, 109 Or App 654 , 820 P2d 888 (1991), State v.

Wattenbarger v. Boise Cascade Corp.

76 Or. App. 125 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1985

Uris v. Compensation Department, 247 Or 420, 428 , 427 P2d 753 , 430 P2d 851 (1967). The power to award attorney fees is no broader than that provided by statute. SAIF v. … Forney v. Western States Plywood, 297 Or 628, 634 , 686 P2d 1027 (1984).

O'BRIEN v. United States

166 F. Supp. 231 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 30, 1958

In Brown v. Harrison, plaintiff was injured when traveling on the highway from Knowle to Warwick, England, when a chestnut tree in an obvious state of decay, 18 feet from the highway, broke. In Hay v. … Because of its reliance on actual notice, the Ohio court does not adhere to the rule laid down in either Brandywine Hundred Realty Co. v. Cotillo or Brown v.

Maddox v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

59 Or. App. 508 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1982

The Board based its conclusion on a rule it articulated in Harry McGarrah, WCB Case No. 79-05440 (1981). We have rejected the application of that rule in that case. McGarrah v. SAIF, 59 Or App 448 , 651 P2d 153 (1982). … We conclude, as in McGarrah v.

Thomas v. State Accident Insurance Fund

8 Or. App. 414 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 1972

State v. Krause, 251 Or 318 , 445 P2d 500 (1968). Highway Commission v. Helliwell, 225 Or 588 , 358 P2d 719 (1961), Senger v. Vancouver-Portland Bus Co., 209 Or 37 , 298 P2d 835 , 304 P2d 448 (1956).” State v. … Huard v. McTeigh, 113 Or 279 , 232 P 658 , 39 ALR528 (1925). ② Common-law marriages are likewise not valid in California. Norman v.

Rogers v. HOLMES

214 Or. 687 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1958

Engle v. State Land Board, 164 Or 109, 115 , 99 P2d 1018 ; Wood v. Sprague, 165 Or 122, 125 , 106 P2d 287 ; Haley v. Sprague, 166 Or 320, 325 , 111 P2d 1031 ; Peters v. … Engle v. State Land Board, supra ( 164 Or at 114 ).

Derryberry v. Dokey

91 Or. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1988

The Derryberrys seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, which found that they are noncomplying employers and held that Bauman v. … On review, the Board agreed that the Derryberrys were noncomplying but found that the claim is not compensable on its facts. The Board concluded, however, that Bauman v.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Pitzer

123 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 1, 1993

Kephart v. Green River Lumber, 118 Or App 76, 79 , 846 P2d 428 (1993); Hicks v. Spectra Physics, 117 Or App 293, 296 , 843 P2d 1009 (1992); Albany General Hospital v. … Marshall v. Korpa, 118 Or App 144, 147 , 846 P2d 445 , rev den 316 Or 528 (1993); see also Drews v. EBI Companies, 310 Or 134 , 795 P2d 531 (1990).

Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply

336 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2004

On January 20, 2000, in a brief order on review, the board affirmed. 8 C. Mount v. … For that reason, we affirm the board’s orders in Logsdon v. SAIF and Mount v. DCBS, and we affirm the decisions of the Court of Appeals in those cases. We also affirm the Court of Appeals decision in Trujillo v.

SAIF Corp. v. Gaffke

152 Or. App. 367 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 1998

See Somers v. SAIF, 77 Or App 259, 263 , 712 P2d 179 (1986) (Board may give more weight to medical opinions that are well reasoned and based on complete information.). … In SAIF v.

State v. Stewart

123 Or. App. 147 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1993

Defendant’s argument relies primarily on City of Pendleton v. Standerfer, 297 Or 725 , 688 P2d 68 (1984). See also State v. Grenvik, 291 Or 99 , 628 P2d 1195 (1981); Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … State v. Farmer, 317 Or 220, 224 , 856 P2d 623 (1993); see also State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990).