Case law

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Nagle

55 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1916

This board was taken from one of the demolished cars, which was afterwards burned. The ditch was from four to six feet deep. *246 The rule applicable here is stated in Mayne v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. … Gulf, etc., Ry. v. Jackson, 65 Fed. 48 , 12 C. C. A. 507 ; Minneapolis v. Lundin, 58 Fed. 525 , 7 C. C. A. 344 ; Porter v. Silver Creek, etc., Coal Co., 84 Wis. 418, 423 , 54 N. W. 1019 ; Colo. Coal & Iron Co. v.

Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Roebuck

205 Okla. 549 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1951

Co. v. … In Heva v.

Schuck v. Moore

48 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1915

Sproad v. Durland, 7 Okla. 230 , 54 P. 458 ; Denny v. Wright, 13 Okla. 256 , 74 P. 104 ; Ford v. McIntosh, 22 Okla. 423 , 98 P. 341 ; Meadors v. Johnson, 27 Okla. 543 , 117 P. 198 ; Brown v. … Co. v. Fain, 34 Okla. 164 , 124 P. 70 . We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed. By the Court: It is so ordered. *Page 535

Hubbard v. Oklahoma City

177 Okla. 263 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1936

See Keaton v. Brown, 171 Okla. 38 , 45 P. (2d) 109 . … Kenyon v. Edmundson, 80 Okla. 3 , 193 P. 739 ; McPherson v. First Presbyterian Church of Woodward, 120 Okla. 40 , 248 P. 561 , 51 A. L. R. 1215; Magnolia Petroleum Co. v.

Petition of Leaser

89 Okla. Crim. 351 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1949

McDaniel v. Turner, Sheriff, 84 Okla. Cr. 247 , 181 P. 2d 296 . … A report of this examination should be made to the Pardon and Parole Board by the Pardon and Parole Officer for consideration by the Board, and recommendation to the Governor.

In Re Appeal of Texas, O. & E. Ry. Co.

163 Okla. 25 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1933

S. 1921, allowing and providing for appeals from actions and orders from the State Board of Equalization to the Supreme Court of the state.” … S. 1931, Secs. 12661, 12664]. as defined by the rule laid down in Dolese Bros. v. Board of County Com’rs of Comanche County, 151 Okla. 110 , 2 P. (2d) 955 .

Worrell v. Graves

101 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1924

This case has been followed by this court many times in its different phases and with reference to the question here particularly in the following cases: Brown v. Van Pelt, 64 Okla. 109 , 166 Pac. 102 ; Walker v. … Lehmer, 22 Okla. 627 , 98 Pac. 351 , which case was overruled in effect in Hudson v. Hildt, supra, and specifically overruled in Brown et al. v. Van Pelt, supra.

Gulley v. Territory of Oklahoma

19 Okla. 187 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

Turnpike Co. v. People, 82 Ill. 174 ; Minturn v. Larue, 23 How. (U. S.) 435. … McCardell v. McNay, 17 Kan. 433 ; Kimball v. Connor, 3 Kan. 414 . .

BURLESON v. WAYNE

495 P.3d 146 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 10, 2021

Burleson argues on appeal that the Supreme Court's discretion not to review a certified interlocutory order is a final order, and dispositive of this appeal, citing Brown v. Brown, 1994 OK CIV APP 29 , 871 P.2d 451 . … State By and Through Children's Hosp. of Oklahoma Discussed 1994 OK CIV APP 29 , 871 P.2d 451 , 65 OBJ 1209, Brown v.

Opinion No. (2009)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 2009

City of Durant v. Cicio , 50 P.3d 218 , 221 (Okla. 2002). "Courts will give the words of a statute a plain and ordinary meaning, unless a contrary intention plainly appears." Id . … By definition, a conservation district board is not a "state board" or "state commission."

Taylor v. State Ex Rel. Rutherford

291 P.2d 1033 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1955

In the case of Kentucky State Board of Dental Examiners v. … West v.

Muratore v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety

320 P.3d 1024 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 2014

Seq eg., State v. … ."); U.S. v.

In Re Referendum Petition No. 1

203 Okla. 298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1950

Drain v. … In Jackson v.

Isbell v. STATE, ETC.

603 P.2d 758 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1979

[Emphasis added] In Trask v. … Ever since Poafpybitty v.

Hemphill, LLC v. Board of Trustees of the Town of Dickson, Oklahoma

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Nov 18, 2024

As such, the Court is unable to determine if the “Town Board” and “Board of Trustees are synonymous. … Rando v. Standard Ins.

City of Tulsa v. Weston

102 Okla. 222 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1924

Reardon v. … In the case of Kerker v.

School District No. 78 v. School District No. 51

180 Okla. 321 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1937

Co. v. … See, also, City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County, 155 Okla. 126 , 8 P. (2d) 2 .

Collier v. Reese

223 P.3d 966 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 2009

Whitehorse v. Johnson, 2007 OK 11 , 18 fn. 13, 156 P.3d 41 ; Neumann v. Arrowsmith, 2007 OK 10, 18 , 164 P.3d 116 . . Injunction proceedings are equitable in nature. Brown ex rel. Brown v. … Brown ex rel. Brown v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n, see note 12, supra; Sharp v. 251st St. Landfill, Inc., 1996 OK 109, 14 , 925 P.2d 546 ; State ex rel. Schulte v.

PARSON v. FARLEY

2025 OK CIV APP 10 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 2025

See Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. , 1992 OK 72 833 P.2d 1218 Hill v. … Board of Education, District I-009, Jones, Oklahoma , 1997 OK 111 In the Matter of the Estate of Foresee , 2020 OK 88 475 P.3d 862 See Discover Bank v.

Thacker v. Witt

64 Okla. 169 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1917

Board Com’rs v. Alexander, 58 Okla. 128 , 159 Pac. 311 . … Carroll v. Gerlach, Treas., et al., supra; Williams, County Clerk, v. Garfield Exchange Bank, 38 Okla. 539 , 134 Pac. 863 ; Higgins, Neville & Boddy v. Wood, Treas., et al., supra; Board Com’rs v.