Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.94s
Consolidated School Dist. No. 4 v. Millis
192 Okla. 687 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1943
School District v. Colvin, 10 Kan. 283 . The contract involved in the case at bar specifically provides that plaintiff “ . . . agrees in all things to observe the rules and regulations of the district board ...” … J. 397-8; Loehr v. Board of Education, 12 Cal. A. 671, 108 P. 325 . The rules of law relating to performance and breach of contracts generally apply to contracts between teachers and school authorities. 56 C. J. 396.
Cited 1 timesPublished163 Okla. 213 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1933
Taylor v. Brown. Co. Treas., et al., 145 Okla. 18 , 291 P. 10 ; Avery et al. v. Interstate Groc. Co. et al., 118 Okla. 268 , 248 P. 340 ; Board of Co. Com’rs v. Ryan, Co. … Board of Com’rs v. Ryan, Co. Treas., 107 Okla. 278 , 232 P. 834 ; Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Sappington, Co. Treas., et al., 124 Okla. 16 , 253 P. 483 ; Stone v. Bonaparte, Co.
Cited 14 timesPublished164 Okla. 244 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1933
See, also, National Surety Company v. State ex rel. Richards, supra; State, for the Use of Board of County Commissioners of Osage County, v. McCurdy, supra. … Schilling v. Oklahoma City, supra; National Surety Company v. State, 111 Okla. 180 , 239 P. 257 ; State, for the Use of Board of Commissioners of Osage County v. McCurdy, 115 Okla. 111 , 241 P. 816 ; Abernathy v.
Overruled in part, on other grounds by State for Use of Board of County Com'rs of Pontotoc County Ex Rel. Braly v. Ford, 189 Okla. 299 (1941)Cited 13 timesPublishedTaylor v. State Ex Rel. Rutherford
291 P.2d 1033 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1955
In the case of Kentucky State Board of Dental Examiners v. … West v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedIn re Protest of Taxpayers of Nichols Hills
198 Okla. 500 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1947
This is a direct appeal from the order of the board, and the cases discussed in the briefs, chief among which *501 is Blake et al. v. … Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. State, 174 Okla. 109 , 50 P. 2d 150 .
Cited 2 timesPublished71 Okla. Crim. 136 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1941
Elmer Young v. State, 71 Okla. Cr. 112 , 108 P. 2d 1028 ; Nott v. State, 70 Okla. Cr. 432 , 107 P. 2d 366 ; Barfield v. State, 68 Okla. Cr. 455 , 99 P. 2d 544 ; Matthews v. State, 67 Okla. … Counsel for defendant, in anticipation of the position to be talien by the state in this case, cites the cases of Brown v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 115 , 167 P. 762 ; Price v. State, 1 Okla.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMuratore v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety
320 P.3d 1024 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 2014
Seq eg., State v. … ."); U.S. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedApplication of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth.
355 P.2d 1028 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1960
In Book v. … Thomson v.
Cited 45 timesPublished208 Okla. 334 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1952
In McCleary v. Brown, 190 Okla. 19 , 119 P. 2d 830 , this court held: “2. … United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co., 49 Okla. 398 , 153 P. 195 ; Broadwell v. Board of Commissioners, 88 Okla. 147 , 211 P. 1040 ; Skelly Oil Co., v. Harrell, 192 Okla. 101 , 134 P. 2d 136 .
Cited 5 timesPublished603 P.2d 758 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1979
[Emphasis added] In Trask v. … Ever since Poafpybitty v.
Cited 10 timesPublished164 Okla. 29 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1933
Kindall v. McBirney (Idaho) 11 P. (2d) 370 ; Employers Liability Assur. Corp. v. Industrial Accident Comm., 187 Cal. 615 , 203 P. 95 ; J. B. Herd Hardware Co. v. … Co. v. Thomas, 162. Okla. 5, 18 P. (2d) 891 ; Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. (2d) 141 . This jurisdictional question has been considered recently by the court in several cases.
Cited 23 timesPublishedPure Oil Pipe Line Co. v. Cornish
163 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1933
In support of that contention it cites New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U. S. 262 , 52 S. Ct. 371 , 76 L. Ed. 747 ; Williams v. Standard Oil Co., 278 U. S. 235 , 73 L. Ed. 287 ; Producers Transportation Co. v. … Ed. 239 ; Frost v. Railroad Commission, 271 U. S. 583 , 46 S. Ct. 605 , 70 *82 L. Ed. 1101; Huron Portland Cement Co. v. Woodworth, 19 Fed. (2d) 030; Associated Pipe Line Co. v. Railroad Commission of California et al.
Cited 12 timesPublishedEstate of Doyle v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
248 P.3d 947 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 2010
Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, ¶ 4 , 85 P.3d 841, 844 . Such a review "involves consideration of whether a plaintiff's petition is legally sufficient." Id. … Id. at ¶ 14, 160 P.3d at 964 (citing Iglehart v. Board of Cnty.
Cited 4 timesPublishedEagle Creek Oil Co. v. Illinois-Oklahoma Petroleum Corp.
141 Okla. 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1930
Co. v. Akers, 96 Okla. 232 , 221 Pac. 493 ; Cleveland v. Rankin, 48 Okla. 99 , 149 Pac. 1131 ; Burch v. Staples, 70 Okla. 245 , 174 Pac. 271 ; Davis v. Keeche Oil & Gas Co., 89 Okla. 226 , 214 Pac. 711 . … Grimes v. Sanders, 93 U. S. 55 , 23 L. Ed. 798 ; Green v. Cox Machinery Co., 116 Okla. 255 , 244 Pac. 414 , and cases cited.
Cited 2 timesPublished452 P.2d 777 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1969
As we noted above, the record herein is almost totally void of any evidence supporting the conclusions of the Banking Board of which petitioners complain. Respondents also cite Oklahoma State Banking Board v. … J., BERRY, V. C. J., and BLACKBIRD, HODGES and McINER-NEY, JJ., concur. DAVISON, JACKSON and LAVENDER, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRoberts v. South Oklahoma City Hospital Trust
742 P.2d 1077 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1986
In Hammons v. … See Hammons v. Muskogee Medical Center Authority, note 6, supra. . Jarvis v. City of Stillwater, 669 P.2d 1108, 1111 (Okla.1983). . Hershel v. University Hosp. Found., 610 P.2d 237, 240-42 (Okla.1980). .
Cited 18 timesPublishedEvans v. Tulsa City Lines, Inc.
290 P.2d 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1955
In his first proposition claimant asserts that under the rule announced in Bartlett-Collins Co. v. Roach, 180 Okl. 521 , 71 P.2d *127 489 and Brown & Root, Inc., v. … Referring to Brown & Root, Inc., v.
Cited 10 timesPublished618 P.2d 401 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1980
Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954); Adams v. Professional Practices Commission, Okl., 524 P.2d 932 (1974). In Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine v. … Sanders v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission, 200 Okl. 366 , 195 P.2d 272 (1948); Speaker v. Board of County Commissioners, Okl., 312 P.2d 438 (1957); Hughes v.
Cited 76 timesPublished80 Okla. 250 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1920
This same construction of this section of the Constitution was reaffirmed by this court *252 in the case of Montgomery v. State Election Board, 27 Okla. 324 , 111 Pac. 447 . … Oil Co. v. Bartlett, 236 Fed. 488 ; Barnett v. Kunkel, 259 Fed. 394 ; State v. Huser, 76 Okla. 130 , 184 Pac. 113 .
Cited 19 timesPublished85 Okla. Crim. 116 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1947
In Hart v. State, 57 Okla. … In the case of Hopper v. State, 81 Okla.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna